<p>08/02/16</p>
<p>Spoke to PJC-S -> Ethernet cables from FEEs to switch are all 4m Cat6.</p>
<p>System powered on with bias to detector of +200V and leakage current of 6.4uA at room temp 19.0oC.</p>
<p>Double peaking present again in nnaida11/12 -> individual peaks @ ~100ch FWHM with separation ~150ch @ 2us shaping time.</p>
<p>Double peaking also present in nnaida13/14 -> indiv peaks ~100ch FWHM and separation ~90ch.</p>
<p>Changing grounding had no effect.</p>
<p>Made ribbon cable with 2 separately shielded halves plus connecting Cu tape strip at FEE and + drain wire in contact with both halves - single peaks - widths of ~110-160ch.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>09/02/16</p>
<p>Added conductive gasket to Cu mount blocks</p>
<p> - resistance between Cu and gasket ~0.2 Ohms (probe-to-probe = 0.16 Ohms)</p>
<p> - LEMO connector to Cu mount block ~0.35 Ohms</p>
<p> - LEMO to LEMO (between adapter PCBs) ~0.55 Ohms (connected by heavy duty Cu braid)</p>
<p>Powered system on. Bias of +200V and leakage current = 5.5uA @ room temp 19.5oC.</p>
<p>With gasket added and heavy duty Cu braid between mount blocks, pulser FWHM in nnaida11 ~ 62ch and in nnaida13 ~72ch at shaping time of 8us.</p>
<p>Investigated effect of shaping time on peak FWHM (avg width found from average of 1.(6,8,10,12).L for each FEE. (see attachments)</p>
<p> Shaping time (us) | nnaida11 | nnaida12 | nnaida13 | nnaida14 </p>
<p> 0.5 | 95* | 108* | 126* | 99*</p>
<p> 1.0 | 82 | 116** | 130^ | 110** </p>
<p> 2.0 | 68 | 83^ | 110^ | 92^</p>
<p> 4.0 | 60 | 77 | 85' | 90</p>
<p> 8.0 | 56 | 63 | 77 | 64</p>
<p> * = all peaks single and Gaussian looking</p>
<p> ** = not all peaks Gaussian, some flat or sloped top </p>
<p> ^ = double peaks, widths estimated from tallest peak</p>
<p> ' = flat topped</p> |