AIDA
GELINA
BRIKEN
nToF
CRIB
ISOLDE
CIRCE
nTOFCapture
DESPEC
DTAS
EDI_PSA
179Ta
CARME
StellarModelling
DCF
K40
AIDA
Draft saved at 00:00:00
Fields marked with
*
are required
Entry time:
Sat Mar 29 12:28:57 2025
Author
*
:
Subject
*
:
<p> <table width="98%" align="center" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid #486090;"> <tbody> <tr> <td cellpadding="3px" style="background-color:#486090; font-weidht:bold; color:white;">Quote:</td></tr> <tr> <td cellpadding="10px" style="background-color:#FFFFB0;"><p>Data for ~3 hrs: Nov 28th, 20:06 to 23:16</p> <p>Bigrips run 1060 to 1062</p> <p>AIDA run R30_ 2 to R30_40</p> <p>Degrader setting: variable= (0.3mmW/1mmAl + 1mmW/1mmAl) + fixed= ( 8 mm Al)</p> <p><strong>IMPLANT PROFILE:</strong> Compare to previous setting (with 3mm Pb as fixed degrader) in elog entry https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/AIDA/487</p> <p>In particular, attachment: https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/AIDA/161127_195411/run104x_imp_profile.png</p> <p>The implantation positin for 40Mg seems to be well optimized (perhaps we can add ~0.5 mm Al to move it further downstream, but not more than that!).</p> <p><strong>IMPLANT EFFICIENCY:</strong> If we compare the number of Al and Mg ions in the ZDS PID for the three runs (~46000, see attachment 5) to the number of ions identified as implants (9389, see attachment 2), we get:</p> <p>Implant efficiency ~ 20 % (=9389/46000)</p> <p> </p> <p>P/S: attachment: hit pattern in BRIKEN with F11 plastic (beam), only for BigRIPS run 40Mg1060</p> <p> </p></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </p><p> </p>
Encoding
:
HTML
ELCode
plain
Suppress Email notification
Attachment 1:
Drop attachments here...
Draft saved at 00:00:00
ELOG V3.1.4-unknown