AIDA
GELINA
BRIKEN
nToF
CRIB
ISOLDE
CIRCE
nTOFCapture
DESPEC
DTAS
EDI_PSA
179Ta
CARME
StellarModelling
DCF
K40
AIDA
Draft saved at 00:00:00
Fields marked with
*
are required
Entry time:
Mon Nov 28 15:53:39 2016
Author
*
:
Subject
*
:
<p>We noticed a peculiar feature in the time-stamp synchronization monitor. The spectra of timestamp difference between pairs of DAQ systems show, for all possible pair combinations, a peak at Delta(ts)= 65535 = 2**15</p> <p>This corresponds to a difference of 2.6 ms (for 25MHz correlation clock). See the attachments taken ~23:00 of Nov 28th.</p> <p>We performed the AIDA system-wide checks (no errors) and a timestamp reset, but the second peak at 65K is still there (we also checked that there is no peak at 2*65K, at least in a short run period).</p> <p>We also observed a double peak for timestam-differences close to zero, which we interpret as good correlations (attachment 2). Note, however, that this double peak became much supprese around midnight (see attachment 6 and 7).</p> <p>From analysis of ion (BigRIPS) and implant (AIDA) correlations we have some confidence that these two DAQs are synchronized; see entry https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/AIDA/492 where we identify an implant for 20% ofions at F11 (and with an implantatin profile that, for example, is consistent with changes to the degrader configuration)</p> <p> </p>
Encoding
:
HTML
ELCode
plain
Suppress Email notification
Resubmit as new entry
Attachment 1:
sync_vs_ribf.png
Original size: 1200x864
Attachment 2:
sync_vs_ribf_zoom_0.png
Original size: 1200x864
Attachment 3:
sync_vs_ribf_zoom_65k.png
Original size: 1200x864
Attachment 4:
sync_vs_briken.png
Original size: 1200x864
Attachment 5:
sync_vs_aida.png
Original size: 1200x864
Attachment 6:
sync_vs_aida_zoom_0.png
Original size: 1200x864
Attachment 7:
sync_vs_briken_zoom_0b.png
Original size: 1200x864
Attachment 8:
Drop attachments here...
Draft saved at 00:00:00
ELOG V3.1.4-unknown