Offline analysis of the AIDA Oct17/R17_31 to R17_34 data "84Ge setting"
compared to an equivalent analysis of the AIDA RIBF128/R5_124 to R5_148
data from the 130Ag setting of the June 2017 RIBF128 experiment.

N.B. 
1) no software thresholds
2) no PID correlation
3) unless otherwise stated, all implant energies are the stopping layer implant energies

Attachment 1 - implantation energy (20MeV/ch, range 20.48GeV)
               versus
               per pixel implant-decay correlation time (163.84us/ch, range 16.78ms)

               The 130Ag data (lower) clearly shows the "20ms bump", there is no
               evidence for a "20ms bump" in the "84Ge" data (upper).

               Note the non-observation of the "20ms bump" in the "84Ge" data
               is not explained by the larger range of implant energies of the
               130Ag data ( see attachment 7 )
               
Attachments 2-3 - per pixel implant-decay times (163.84us/ch)

                  upper 130Ag setting
                  lower "84Ge setting"

Attachments 4-5 - per pixel implant-decay times (163.84us/ch)

                  red 130Ag setting
                  yellow "84Ge setting"

Attachment 6 - *total* implant energy for AIDA DSSSD stack (5.6MeV/channel)

               yellow 130Ag setting
               red "84Ge setting"

Attachment 7 - implant energy for stopping DSSSD layer (20MeV/channel)

               red 130Ag setting
               yellow "84Ge setting"

Attachment 8 - per pixel decay-decay correlation time (163.84us/ch, range 16.78ms)
               versus
               per pixel implant-decay correlation time (163.84us/ch, range 16.78ms)

               upper "84Ge setting"
               lower 130Ag setting

Attachment 9 - x and y-axis projections for 130Ag setting spectrum

               @x per pixel implant-decay correlation time (163.84us/ch, range 16.78ms)
               @y per pixel decay-decay correlation time (163.84us/ch, range 16.78ms)

Attachment 10 - x and y-axis projections for "84Ge setting" setting spectrum

               @x per pixel implant-decay correlation time (163.84us/ch, range 16.78ms)
               @y per pixel decay-decay correlation time (163.84us/ch, range 16.78ms)