AIDA
GELINA
BRIKEN
nToF
CRIB
ISOLDE
CIRCE
nTOFCapture
DESPEC
DTAS
EDI_PSA
179Ta
CARME
StellarModelling
DCF
K40
CARME
Draft saved at 00:00:00
Fields marked with
*
are required
Entry time:
Thu Sep 2 21:04:26 2021
Author
*
:
Subject
*
:
Mounted both gate valves and support. Gate valves could not be installed one bolt rotated from 90 degrees as per drawings due to mechanical conflict with back foot. Using rotating flanges some small rotation from 90 was achieved. This may be sufficient given the reason for the rotation was to avoid mechanical conflicts with ring parts that are no longer there. Valve struts had to be modified as gate valve is much lower and close to Al frame than in Daresbury. ML suggested that the reason for the change in height mentioned in previous entry is that the ring gate valve to YR10 is not centered. Solutions will be considered when the other two setups in YR09 are mounted and the alignment situation is more clear Noted a few blind flanges are bluish, which indicates SS 304 instead of 316. Did we get the wrong ones from ITL? Did we swap them in Daresbury by mistake? Is it just an odd colour? Installed turbo pump on top gate valve, Pirani gauge provided by ABD (where is ours?) and pumped down. Reached 10-1 mbar in 10 minutes. Turbo on. Reached 10-5 mbar on IE514 in 17 more minutes (where is its manual?) Will leave pumping overnight.
Encoding
:
HTML
ELCode
plain
Suppress Email notification
Resubmit as new entry
Attachment 1:
20210902_152536.jpg
Original size: 4000x2250
Attachment 2:
20210902_153213.jpg
Original size: 4000x2250
Attachment 3:
20210902_170002.jpg
Original size: 4000x2250
Attachment 4:
20210902_192104.jpg
Original size: 4000x2250
Attachment 5:
20210902_192751.jpg
Original size: 4000x2250
Attachment 6:
20210902_193944.jpg
Original size: 4000x2250
Attachment 7:
Drop attachments here...
Draft saved at 00:00:00
ELOG V3.1.4-unknown