ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
586
|
Tue Jun 4 14:13:17 2024 |
JM, CB, DB, US | Run 32- beam only background |
15:15
Run 32 started - Beam, no target
Beam energy = 3 MeV.
Horizontal beam position = 4.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 5 minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.
Motors code crashed. Beam removed from ring to re-home detectors.
15:20
Beam in the ring again, detectors homed, no target
Detectors have been set up to send signals on injection / dump
15:35
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
|
585
|
Tue Jun 4 06:56:02 2024 |
DFF, PC, LB, JM,NP,AB | Run 31 contd |
8:13
Since 6:40 the target density dramatically dropped to 10^9 since then it has been unstable and did not recover. Currently it is around 8e8.
09:00
Target density has been increased to the high -10, very low -11 region. We will keep this run going unless the density is increased further.
10:21
Beam energy = 3 MeV.
Horizontal beam position = 4.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Target density ~ 1e9 at/cm2 (no target, get lost quite quckly)
Beam intensity at inj ~ 1.7e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 6 minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.36e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
target density has been fluctuating between E9 to E12. We can very clearly see the increase in elastic counts on our detector during high density periods.
Attachment 1 - rate plots at 1E12 at/cm2
Attachment 2 - rate plots at 1E9 at/cm2
12:26
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
After reaching a density of > 10^12 a bit before 11:00, the valve got closed. When a valve is closed, can be observed a dramatic change in the plot and one of the three green ligths of atps7vaccrz1 (0,2,4) is turned off. Nikos opened it, and now it seems stable again around 1e11.
14:07
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
15:05
Run stopped as target density is rubbish. Might as well get beam background |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_10-53-58.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_10-58-02.png
|
|
584
|
Tue Jun 4 00:04:39 2024 |
DR, EH | Run 31 |
Beam energy = 3 MeV
Horizontal beam position = 4.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm = 64.60 mm
Cycle time ~ 6 minutes
01:05
Target density still very unstable
02:45
Target density has dropped to ~1e9 and has been at that level for 30 minutes. We will try to move the target a bit and see if we can get an increase. Target position is currently x=-12400, y=2900
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
04:15
We were able to recover some target, but it is still very unstable. The new position is x=-12800, y=2000
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
06:15
Target still unstable, fluctuating around the 5e10 region
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK |
583
|
Mon Jun 3 21:37:20 2024 |
CN, EM, CB | Run30 |
Beam energy = 3 MeV
Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm = 64.60 mm
22:52 (Attachments 1 -3)
Beam is very unstable
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
00:47
Beam is still very unstable.
We checked for beam-target overlap position and found a clear increase in counts at beam position 4.0 mm. We have left the beam at horizontal = 4.0 mm, vertical = 0.0
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_23-15-37.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_23-16-18.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_23-17-16.png
|
|
582
|
Mon Jun 3 15:17:41 2024 |
CN, EM, CB | Run29 |
16:15
In the previous run while working on the target it was discovered that the valve was closed! Probaly this happened around 10 am, we are not sure.
The gas target inlet valve is open again, working on the target.
Beam energy = 3 MeV
Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN pneumatic only. Left arm = 62.71, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 7 minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.
18:03 ( Attchments 1 -4)
Still no target!
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
20:23
We have the target back. S1( grafana) 4.8e-8. The target thickness read by the system 5E11 atoms/cm2 but apparently the formula is wrong and the value should be almost e12 atoms/cm2.
. We have now proper beam and target and we
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-04-47.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-05-11.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-06-09.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-06-40.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_20-35-00.png
|
|
581
|
Mon Jun 3 15:10:12 2024 |
CN, EM, CB | Run28 |
16:10
We start a new run after doing some test with the motor. Injection time is now a 6s, moving of the motors is working fine.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
No target
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-12-44.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-13-11.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-14-11.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-16-37.png
|
|
580
|
Mon Jun 3 11:46:07 2024 |
SD, SHB, JM, CN, EM | Run 27 |
12:46 (attachments 1-4)
Run 27 started - Beam no target
Beam energy = 3 MeV
Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN pneumatic only. Left arm = 62.71, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 7 minutes.
Beam on BPM looks to be better than at previous energy.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
13:45 (attachments 5-8)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
15:15(attachments 9-12)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Target density 1e10 atoms/cm2. Still working on the target.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-48-03.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-48-37.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-49-13.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-49-47.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-45-42.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-46-49.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-47-32.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-47-51.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-16-51.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-17-49.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-18-19.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-22-14.png
|
|
579
|
Mon Jun 3 08:43:22 2024 |
SD, SHB | Run 26 |
09:44
Run 26 started - Beam no target
Beam energy is being increased from 1.5 to 3 MeV
Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Detectors are positioned fully OUT
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
10:48 (Attachements 1-4)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The detectors currently fully out for tuning.
11:57 (attachments 5-8)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The detectors currently fully out for tuning.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-49-19.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-50-04.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-53-01.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-53-44.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-55-41.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-56-17.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-56-36.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-57-31.png
|
|
578
|
Sun Jun 2 23:38:17 2024 |
JM, EM | Run 25 |
00:38
Run 25 started - Beam on target
Beam energy = 1.5 MeV.
Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Target density ~ 5e11 at/cm2 (Still Fluctuating, after temperature increase)
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 5 minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 5.2e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
01:30 (Attachments 1 - 4)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density seems very unstable: fluctuations from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm2 within 5min
02:37 (Attachments 5 - 8)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is around 5e11 atoms/cm2 with small adjustments
03:32 (Attachments 9 - 12)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is in average 5e11 atoms/cm2 with some small adjustments. Max values up to 3e12 atoms/cm2
One of the injections at 03:43 was not ok and we lost beam for some min. Target density 1e12 atoms/cm2. On 04:00 the beam was back again without any operator intervention.
04:35 (Attachments 13 - 16)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is in average 1e12 atoms/cm2.
05:43 (Attachments 17 - 20)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density decreased to 2e11 atoms/cm2 in the last 40 min
06:43 (Attachments 21 - 24)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....
07:53 (Attachments 25 - 28)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....
08:48 (Attachments 29 - 32)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....
09:40 --> Run 25 stopped.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-08.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-32.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-54.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-35-46.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-30.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-55.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-39-26.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-40-07.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-32.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-56.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-34-20.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-35-16.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-35-47.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-07.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-25.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-39-59.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-44-44.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-07.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-24.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-46-22.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-21.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-49.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-43-48.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-44-02.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-48-07.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-49-47.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-50-51.png
|
|
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-53-01.png
|
|
Attachment 29: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-03.png
|
|
Attachment 30: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-41.png
|
|
Attachment 31: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-47-09.png
|
|
Attachment 32: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-48-17.png
|
|
577
|
Sun Jun 2 22:46:47 2024 |
JM, EM, NP | Run24 |
23:47
Run 24 started - Beam on target
Beam energy is 1.5 MeV.
Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = -1.0 mm.
Target density ~ 1e11 at/cm2 (Still Fluctuating, after temperature increase)
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 10 minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 5.2e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
00:23
Target density ~4.65e11 atoms/cm2
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.7e7
Beam intensity dropped to 2.1e7 in 10 minutes. Proportionall this is much greater than before.
Run 24 stopped.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_23-53-00.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_23-53-47.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_23-56-22.png
|
|
576
|
Sun Jun 2 14:30:16 2024 |
TD | Offline analysis G22-201/R22_0 - R22_11 |
Offline analysis data file G22-201/R22_0 to R22_11
Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat
ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain
per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1
For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8
per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
note - x/y channel ordering to be checked
per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
20keV/channel nominal
per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
gated w(1) & w(2)
20keV/channel nominal
per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
20keV/channel nominal |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-04-28.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-05-20.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-05-58.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_22-57-42.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_22-59-30.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-00-45.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-01-56.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-03-22.png
|
|
575
|
Sun Jun 2 13:04:41 2024 |
JM, AG, CB, DR | Run 23 - vertical beam position and beam lifetime tests |
14:05
Run 22 stopped. Run 23 started we will now adjust the vertical beam position to see if we observe the beam stripe seen in the last beamtime.
Current vertical beam position 0.0 mm. Horizontal beam position 7.0 mm. Coasting beam.
Beam D+, 1.5 MeV. Storage time ~ 20 minutes. Target ON. Density ~1e11 at/cm2.
XY plot from run 22 with the same settings - attachment 1
Beam stripe looks like it is just on bottom detectors (just )
14:10
New beam settings
Vertical Beam position 5.0mm, Horizontal unchanged. Storage time reduced to ~2 minute
No real change observed. Perhaps some thing more can be seen on top right detector but definitely not like in the Feb experiment.
14:15
New beam settings
Vertical Beam position 9.0mm, Horizontal unchanged.
No real change observed again.
14:20
New beam settings
Vertical Beam position -9.0mm, Horizontal unchanged.
More events observed on bottom left detector but nothing like the Feb measurements. I think we do not have stripe effects like previously.
14:40:50
New Beam settings to check beam lifetime.
Vertical beam position set back to 0.0 mm. Horizontal unchanged
In bunched mode to observed intensity over time.
Injection into ring 2.2e7
15:15
Beam intensity dropped to 1.1e7. Beam lifetime 35 minutes.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
15:24
We removed the target. Beam intensity at 2.2E7
After 35 minutes, the beam intensity is 1.41e7. So target does have effect on beam lifetime! We would like more.
16:05
We will now bring target back in and try to increase density.
16:10
Some sort of GSI-wide failure, we have lost beam entirely. We don't see any effect on our system. Temperatures and leakage currents are stable
Detectors moved fully out for safety
17:15
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
19:15
Still no beam
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
21:15
Still no beam
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
21:40
Beam has returned!
22:00
Target at around 9e11 and appears stable
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
22:33
Beam back in the ring. Beam settings to be updated.
Rates in right hand detectors look slightly different to before - lower in bottom right, slightly higher in top left. Perhaps beam vertical position needs to be lowered slightly.
ASIC check load just to be sure. Rates in aida15 greatly reduced - only temporarily.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_14-04-55.png
|
|
574
|
Sun Jun 2 08:47:01 2024 |
CB, AG | Run 22 - longer rung with 20 min storage |
09:47
12 seconds pre acc
200x cycles
Detector pneumatics IN, not moving
Running in this configuration for the rest of the shift
Target is barely 1E11 atoms/cm2 and keeps decreasing
Temps OK, checks OK, Stats OK
Writing to disk rate OK
11:22
Targets gets thinner and thinner <1E11 atoms/cm2
Temps OK System wide checks OK Merger OK
Rates OK
13:02
Temps OK. Target around 1E11 atoms/cm2
Merger OK
Rates OK |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-47-53.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-48-06.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_11-21-59.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_11-22-27.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_13-02-31.png
|
|
573
|
Sun Jun 2 06:41:00 2024 |
CB, AG | Run 21 - tests |
07:41
Switching to bunched beam to check D vs H content.
8:24
Attach 1&2
ONE spill
Detectors fully out
Switched to bunched beam
12 seconds pre-acceleration
100x cycles (600 seconds) -
Loss over 600 seconds 3.97E7 ions to 3.40E7 ions, i.e. negligible.
Attach 3&4
Coasting beam
12 seconds pre-acc
100x cycles
Attch 5&6
Coasting beam
12 seconds pre-acc
100x cycles
Detectors pneumatics IN
Attach 7& 8
Coasting beam
6 seconds pre-acc
100x cycles
Detector pneumatics IN
Attach 8&9
Coasting beam
12 seconds pre acc
200x cycles
Detector pneumatics IN
Running in this configuration for the rest of the shift
Target is barely 1E11 atoms/cm2 and keeps decreasing |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-23-21.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-23-36.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-44-38.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-44-54.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-58-17.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-58-25.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-18-02.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-18-10.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-44-16.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-44-24.png
|
|
572
|
Sat Jun 1 21:56:17 2024 |
JM, EM, EM, TY, CB, AG | Run 20 |
22:56
Run 20 started - beam on target
Beam energy is 1.5 MeV. Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Target density ~ 1e11 at/cm2
Beam intensity at inj ~ 4e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 3minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
01:15
Target density has increased slighty: ~ 4e11 at/cm2 (update: this only lasted about 5 min)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
3:10
Target density has decresed slightly but will come back (hopefully) ~7e10 at/cm2.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
05:15
Target density has been somewhat unstable, between ~7E10 and ~3E12 at/cm2.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
07:37
Run continues. Target density still fluctuating around 1E11 atoms/cm2.
Temperatures OK. Merger OK. Rates OK.
System wide checks as before.
Waveforms OK. See attachments.
Some screenshots from the online analysis. We do not see a peak at 1 MeV. We do however clearly see more D than H2+.
Stopping run to make some tests.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-05.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-46.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-01.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-22.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_03-11-55.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_03-12-00.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_05-14-40.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_05-15-00.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-28-30.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-30-22.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-31-21.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-03.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-21.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-42.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-49.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-33-00.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-33-45.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-36-41.png
|
|
571
|
Sat Jun 1 16:38:13 2024 |
TD | Offline analysis G22-201/R17 |
Offline analysis data file G22-201/R17
Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat
ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain
per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1
DSSSD #2 spectrum is normal, DSSSD #1 and #3-4 display large multiplicities in p and/or n strips which are, presumably, non-physical events at DSSSD edge
For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8
per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
note - x/y channel ordering to be checked
per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
20keV/channel nominal
per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
gated w(1) & w(2)
20keV/channel nominal
per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
20keV/channel nominal
log scale |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-31-53.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-16.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-58.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-34-44.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-36-06.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-37-22.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-39-06.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-40-22.png
|
|
570
|
Sat Jun 1 13:33:50 2024 |
TD | Offline analysis APR24/R3 (alpha background) |
Offline analysis data file APR24/R3 (alpha background)
Run started 11:04 26.4.24
Run ended 09:44 29.4.24
Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat
ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain
per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1
For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8
per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
note - x/y channel ordering to be checked
per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
20keV/channel nominal
per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
gated w(1) & w(2)
20keV/channel nominal
per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
20keV/channel nominal
2D spectra z contours/colour map - attachment 9 |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-24-17.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-25-05.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-10.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-51.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-29-43.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-32-16.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-33-31.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-39.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-57.png
|
|
569
|
Sat Jun 1 07:16:15 2024 |
CB, AB, EM, JM | Run 19 - beam target overlap |
Morning shift
08:16 - as run 18, target off
9:00 Increased storage time to 5 minutes. Aquired data after initial beam loss. Attach 1 &2. Far less H2+ vs D.
Temps OK
Rates as before
10:00 beam being optimised to reduce 2H+ content
Rates in aida 13, 14 suddenly spike as during overnight. Checkloaded repeatedly. No effect. Increased thresholds in 13, 14 to 0x32 bringing them in line with 15,16.
12:50
We started test with beam
Test1 ( Attached 12-52-55)
Horiz. offset: 8mm
Max vuel on 1.5MeV =1480 counst
Test2
Horiz. offset: 7mm
Test3
Horiz. offset: 6mm
target density=2.4E11
Test4
Horiz. offset: 5mm
target density=from 1.7E11 to 2.5E11
Test5
Horiz. offset: 4mm
target density=from 5.6E11 to 1.1E11 several fluctuations
Test6
Horiz. offset: 3mm
target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations. Until now we do not see a clear signel from the reaction!
Test7
Horiz. offset: 2mm
target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations.
Test8
Beam back again. Coasting beam. Detectors IN
Horiz. offset: 8mm
xy and energy histograms - attachment 12 and 13.
Test9
Bunched beam Detectors IN
Horiz. offset: 8mm
xy and energy histograms - attachment 14 and 15.
Test10
Horiz. offset: 6mm
xy and energy histograms - attachment
target:1.6E11
xy and energy histograms - attachment 16 and 17.
Afternoon shift
From previous overlap tests we can see that moving the beam position does cause a change in the number of events observed in the detectors.
But the change in events appears to be due to beam halo hitting the detectors rather than elastic scattering. New approach required.
We have varied the beam position (horizontal) in 1mm steps from 0mm to 9mm (the maximum allowed). We do this with the target ON and then with the target OFF.
Integral of events ~1.5 MeV taken . Difference between the target and no target plotted to gauge overlap position.
Note we have moved left arm fully out as we were worried about beam hitting dssds on injection. Will check overlap with right dssds only as left dssds have very low rate at this position.
We have determined the overlap position is about 7.0mm horizontal
Attachment 18 shows initial scan.
Attachment 19 shows a second scan in the region we highlighted as possible overlap. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-15-54.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-16-11.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-23-17.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-29-48.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-52-55.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-58-44.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-06-01.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-12-10.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-18-32.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-27-12.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-34-07.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-18-55.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-19-10.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-28-08.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-29-26.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-31.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-43.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Overlap1.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Overlap2.png
|
|
568
|
Fri May 31 21:53:20 2024 |
CB EM, JM,EM AB | Overnight beam tests |
22:53
Run 15 started
Beam tests. We increased the storage time to 2min and switched to bunched beam so that we can see the beam lifetime over the cycle.
D+ Beam energy is set to 1.5 MeV.
Detectors are positioned in with servos only (left arm = 28.06mm, right arm = 29.23 mm)
No target
We observe a large peak at the start of the cycle at 750 keV. This seems to be molecular hydrogen circulating in the ring. We also see a much smaller peak at 1.5 MeV (D+)
After a period of time the 750 keV peak decreases significantly and we are left with the 1,5 MeV peak only.
Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 1
Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 2
We observe the large circular structure on the left hand detectors. Is this related to hydrogen or is it the beam type (bunched instead of coasting)?
In the GSI control plots for the number of ions in the ring we observe a large drop in ions circulating at the start of the cycle, and then remains fairly constant throughout the rest of the cycle. - attachment 3
This seems to confirm our hydrogen hypothesis.
23:54
Run 15 stopped, Run 16 started.
All setting the same and still no target, except beam is now coasting. We will compare to Run 15 after one hour of running.
We do not observe the circular distribution on the detector seen in the previous run. It seems this effect comes from the bunched beam. Reason?
We still observe the 750 keV peak at the start of the cycle.
Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 4
Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 5
00:59
Run16 stopped. Run 17 started.
All settings the same except we have switched back to bunched beam.
Target now on. (X=-13700, Y=0). Target density ~ 1E11 at/cm2.
02:03
Run 17 continues
Target has increased in the average density to ~4e11 at/cm2, no changes made to nozzle position and fluctuates to 1e11 or 1e12 at/cm2.
Energy histograms and the xy plots appear similar to bunched beam with no target. The rates are slightly lower with the target for the left hand dssds, maybe target interactions destroy molecular hydrogen quicker?
Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 6
Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 7
We will continue to run for another hour or so in this condition
Target density has decreased over the last minutes. We have tried to move the nozzle to maximise density but fluctuations make this difficult.
03:55
Increase in ADC data items statistics for aida 13 and 14 from ~20 kHz to 90 kHz
ASIC checkload has reduced the rates back to ~ 20 kHz
Total energy histogram after running for ~ 3 hour - attachment 8
Total xy plot after ~ 3 hour - attachment 9
Run 17 stopped. Run 18 started
Beam changed back to coasting. All other settings unchanged. Target on.
04:55
Run 18 continues.
Energy histograms and the xy plots appear similar to bunched beam with no target. The rates are lower with the target than without.
Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 10
Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 11
Note we observed fluctuations in the T2 temperature for the target. T2 is set to 80 K but rapid fluctuations were observed up to 100K. This occurred for only 5 minutes and I am not sure if it is a real effect.
07:20
Temperatures OK
System wide checks OK
Rates OK
Stats OK
Waveforms attached
Leakage current decreasing slightly.
No changes to beam or target. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-52-25.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-51-56.png
|
|
Attachment 3: screenshot-2024-05-31_23-53-125456534733007473468.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-45.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-55.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-01-33.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-02-05.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-39.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-52.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-25.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-43.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-28.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-38.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-00.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-12.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-19-44.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-20-07.png
|
|
567
|
Fri May 31 21:03:21 2024 |
CB, EM | Run14 |
22:03
Before this run we checked quickly beam with the target on but it does not make sense with the current status of the beam.
We removed target and starte Run14
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-05-57.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-01.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-49.png
|
|