AIDA GELINA BRIKEN nToF CRIB ISOLDE CIRCE nTOFCapture DESPEC DTAS EDI_PSA 179Ta CARME StellarModelling DCF K40
  CARME, Page 5 of 33  ELOG logo
ID Date Author Subject
  586   Tue Jun 4 14:13:17 2024 JM, CB, DB, USRun 32- beam only background

15:15

Run 32 started - Beam, no target

Beam energy = 3 MeV.

Horizontal beam position = 4.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7

Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm =  64.60 mm

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Beam in the ring ~ 5 minutes.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.

Motors code crashed. Beam removed from ring to re-home detectors.

 

15:20

Beam in the ring again, detectors homed, no target

Detectors have been set up to send signals on injection / dump

15:35

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

  585   Tue Jun 4 06:56:02 2024 DFF, PC, LB, JM,NP,ABRun 31 contd

8:13

Since 6:40 the target density dramatically dropped to 10^9 since then it has been unstable and did not recover. Currently it is around 8e8.

09:00

Target density has been increased to the high -10, very low -11 region. We will keep this run going unless the density is increased further.

 

10:21

Beam energy = 3 MeV.

Horizontal beam position = 4.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Target density ~ 1e9 at/cm2 (no target, get lost quite quckly)

Beam intensity at inj ~ 1.7e7

Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm =  64.60 mm

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Beam in the ring ~ 6 minutes.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.36e-11 mbar.

 

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

target density has been fluctuating between E9 to E12. We can very clearly see the increase in elastic counts on our detector during high density periods.

Attachment 1 - rate plots at 1E12 at/cm2

Attachment 2 - rate plots at 1E9 at/cm2

 

12:26

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

After reaching a density of > 10^12 a bit before 11:00, the valve got closed. When a valve is closed, can be observed a dramatic change in the plot and one of the three green ligths of atps7vaccrz1 (0,2,4) is turned off. Nikos opened it, and now it seems stable again around 1e11.

 

14:07

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

15:05

Run stopped as target density is rubbish. Might as well get beam background

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_10-53-58.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_10-53-58.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_10-58-02.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_10-58-02.png
  584   Tue Jun 4 00:04:39 2024 DR, EHRun 31

Beam energy = 3 MeV

Horizontal beam position = 4.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7

Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm =  64.60 mm

Cycle time ~ 6 minutes

 

01:05

Target density still very unstable

 

02:45

Target density has dropped to ~1e9 and has been at that level for 30 minutes. We will try to move the target a bit and see if we can get an increase. Target position is currently x=-12400, y=2900

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

 

04:15

We were able to recover some target, but it is still very unstable. The new position is x=-12800, y=2000

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

 

06:15

Target still unstable, fluctuating around the 5e10 region

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

  583   Mon Jun 3 21:37:20 2024 CN, EM, CBRun30

Beam energy = 3 MeV

Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7

Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm =  64.60 mm

22:52 (Attachments 1 -3)

Beam is very unstable

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

 

00:47

Beam is still very unstable.

We checked for beam-target overlap position and found a clear increase in counts at beam position 4.0 mm. We have left the beam at horizontal = 4.0 mm, vertical = 0.0

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_23-15-37.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_23-15-37.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_23-16-18.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_23-16-18.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_23-17-16.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_23-17-16.png
  582   Mon Jun 3 15:17:41 2024 CN, EM, CBRun29

16:15

In the previous run while working on the target it was discovered that the valve was closed! Probaly this happened around 10 am, we are not sure.

The gas target inlet valve is open again, working on the target.

 

Beam energy = 3 MeV

Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7

Detectors are positioned IN pneumatic only. Left arm = 62.71, right arm =  64.60 mm

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Beam in the ring ~ 7 minutes.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.

 

18:03 ( Attchments 1 -4)

Still no target!

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

 

20:23

We have the target back. S1( grafana) 4.8e-8. The target thickness read by the system 5E11 atoms/cm2 but apparently the formula is wrong and the value should be almost e12 atoms/cm2.

. We have now proper beam and target and we

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-04-47.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-04-47.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-05-11.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-05-11.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-06-09.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-06-09.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-06-40.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_18-06-40.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_20-35-00.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_20-35-00.png
  581   Mon Jun 3 15:10:12 2024 CN, EM, CBRun28

16:10

We start a new run after doing some test with the motor. Injection time is now a 6s, moving of the motors is working fine.

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

No target

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-12-44.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-12-44.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-13-11.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-13-11.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-14-11.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-14-11.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-16-37.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_16-16-37.png
  580   Mon Jun 3 11:46:07 2024 SD, SHB, JM, CN, EMRun 27

12:46 (attachments 1-4)

Run 27 started - Beam no target

Beam energy = 3 MeV

Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7

Detectors are positioned IN pneumatic only. Left arm = 62.71, right arm =  64.60 mm

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Beam in the ring ~ 7 minutes.

Beam on BPM looks to be better than at previous energy.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.

 

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

13:45 (attachments 5-8)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

 

15:15(attachments 9-12)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

Target density 1e10 atoms/cm2. Still working on the target.

 

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-48-03.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-48-03.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-48-37.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-48-37.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-49-13.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-49-13.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-49-47.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_12-49-47.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-45-42.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-45-42.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-46-49.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-46-49.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-47-32.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-47-32.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-47-51.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_13-47-51.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-16-51.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-16-51.png
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-17-49.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-17-49.png
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-18-19.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-18-19.png
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-22-14.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_15-22-14.png
  579   Mon Jun 3 08:43:22 2024 SD, SHBRun 26

09:44

Run 26 started - Beam no target

Beam energy is being increased from 1.5 to 3 MeV

Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Detectors are positioned fully OUT

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

10:48 (Attachements 1-4)

 

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The detectors currently fully out for tuning.

 

 

11:57 (attachments 5-8)

 

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The detectors currently fully out for tuning.

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-49-19.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-49-19.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-50-04.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-50-04.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-53-01.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-53-01.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-53-44.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-53-44.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-55-41.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-55-41.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-56-17.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-56-17.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-56-36.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-56-36.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-57-31.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-57-31.png
  578   Sun Jun 2 23:38:17 2024 JM, EMRun 25

00:38

Run 25 started - Beam on target

Beam energy = 1.5 MeV.

Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Target density ~ 5e11 at/cm2 (Still Fluctuating, after temperature increase)

Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7

Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm =  64.60 mm

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Beam in the ring ~ 5 minutes.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 5.2e-11 mbar.

 

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

01:30 (Attachments 1 - 4)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The target density seems very unstable: fluctuations from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm2 within 5min

 

02:37 (Attachments 5 - 8)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The target density is around 5e11  atoms/cm2 with small adjustments

 

03:32 (Attachments 9 - 12)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The target density is in average 5e11  atoms/cm2 with some small  adjustments. Max values up to 3e12 atoms/cm2

 

One of the injections at 03:43  was not ok and we lost beam for some min.  Target density 1e12 atoms/cm2.  On 04:00 the beam was back again without any operator intervention.

 

04:35 (Attachments 13 - 16)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The target density is in average 1e12  atoms/cm2.

 

05:43 (Attachments 17 - 20)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The target density decreased to 2e11 atoms/cm2 in the last 40 min

 

06:43 (Attachments 21 - 24)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....

 

07:53 (Attachments 25 - 28)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....

 

08:48 (Attachments 29 - 32)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....

 

 

09:40 --> Run 25 stopped.

 

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-08.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-08.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-32.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-32.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-54.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-54.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-35-46.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-35-46.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-30.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-30.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-55.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-39-26.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-39-26.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-40-07.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-40-07.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-32.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-32.png
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-56.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-56.png
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-34-20.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-34-20.png
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-35-16.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-35-16.png
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-35-47.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-35-47.png
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-07.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-07.png
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-25.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-25.png
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-39-59.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-39-59.png
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-44-44.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-44-44.png
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-07.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-07.png
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-24.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-24.png
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-46-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-46-22.png
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-21.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-21.png
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-49.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-49.png
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-43-48.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-43-48.png
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-44-02.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-44-02.png
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-48-07.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-48-07.png
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-49-47.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-49-47.png
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-50-51.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-50-51.png
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-53-01.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-53-01.png
Attachment 29: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-03.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-03.png
Attachment 30: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-41.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-41.png
Attachment 31: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-47-09.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-47-09.png
Attachment 32: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-48-17.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-48-17.png
  577   Sun Jun 2 22:46:47 2024 JM, EM, NPRun24

23:47

Run 24 started - Beam on target

Beam energy is 1.5 MeV.

Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = -1.0 mm.

Target density ~ 1e11 at/cm2 (Still Fluctuating, after temperature increase)

Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7

Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm =  64.60 mm

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Beam in the ring ~ 10 minutes.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 5.2e-11 mbar.

 

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

00:23

 

Target density ~4.65e11 atoms/cm2

Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.7e7

Beam intensity dropped to 2.1e7 in 10 minutes. Proportionall this is much greater than before. 

Run 24 stopped.

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_23-53-00.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_23-53-00.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_23-53-47.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_23-53-47.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_23-56-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_23-56-22.png
  576   Sun Jun 2 14:30:16 2024 TDOffline analysis G22-201/R22_0 - R22_11
Offline analysis data file G22-201/R22_0 to R22_11

Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat

ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain

per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1

For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8

per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
 note - x/y channel ordering to be checked

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
 gated w(1) & w(2)
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
 20keV/channel nominal
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-04-28.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-04-28.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-05-20.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-05-20.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-05-58.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-05-58.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_22-57-42.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_22-57-42.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_22-59-30.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_22-59-30.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-00-45.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-00-45.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-01-56.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-01-56.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-03-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-03-22.png
  575   Sun Jun 2 13:04:41 2024 JM, AG, CB, DRRun 23 - vertical beam position and beam lifetime tests

14:05

Run 22 stopped. Run 23 started we will now adjust the vertical beam position to see if we observe the beam stripe seen in the last beamtime.

Current vertical beam position 0.0 mm. Horizontal beam position 7.0 mm. Coasting beam.

Beam D+, 1.5 MeV. Storage time ~ 20 minutes. Target ON. Density ~1e11 at/cm2.

XY plot from run 22 with the same settings - attachment 1

Beam stripe looks like it is just on bottom detectors (just )

14:10

New beam settings

Vertical Beam position 5.0mm, Horizontal unchanged. Storage time reduced to ~2 minute

No real change observed. Perhaps some thing more can be seen on top right detector but definitely not like in the Feb experiment.

14:15

New beam settings

Vertical Beam position 9.0mm, Horizontal unchanged.

No real change observed again.

14:20

New beam settings

Vertical Beam position -9.0mm, Horizontal unchanged.

More events observed on bottom left detector but nothing like the Feb measurements. I think we do not have stripe effects like previously.

14:40:50

New Beam settings to check beam lifetime.

Vertical beam position set back to 0.0 mm. Horizontal unchanged

In bunched mode to observed intensity over time. 

Injection into ring 2.2e7

15:15

Beam intensity dropped to 1.1e7. Beam lifetime 35 minutes.

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

15:24

We removed the target. Beam intensity at 2.2E7

After 35 minutes, the beam intensity is 1.41e7. So target does have effect on beam lifetime! We would like more.

16:05

We will now bring target back in and try to increase density.

16:10

Some sort of GSI-wide failure, we have lost beam entirely. We don't see any effect on our system. Temperatures and leakage currents are stable

Detectors moved fully out for safety

17:15

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

19:15

Still no beam

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

21:15

Still no beam

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

21:40

Beam has returned!

22:00

Target at around 9e11 and appears stable

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

22:33

Beam back in the ring. Beam settings to be updated.

Rates in right hand detectors look slightly different to before - lower in bottom right, slightly higher in top left. Perhaps beam vertical position needs to be lowered slightly.

ASIC check load just to be sure. Rates in aida15 greatly reduced - only temporarily.

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_14-04-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_14-04-55.png
  574   Sun Jun 2 08:47:01 2024 CB, AGRun 22 - longer rung with 20 min storage

09:47

12 seconds pre acc

200x cycles

Detector pneumatics IN, not moving

Running in this configuration for the rest of the shift

Target is barely 1E11 atoms/cm2 and keeps decreasing

 

Temps OK, checks OK, Stats OK

Writing to disk rate OK

 

11:22

Targets gets thinner and thinner <1E11 atoms/cm2

Temps OK System wide checks OK Merger OK

Rates OK

 

13:02

Temps OK. Target around 1E11 atoms/cm2

Merger OK

Rates OK

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-47-53.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-47-53.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-48-06.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-48-06.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_11-21-59.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_11-21-59.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_11-22-27.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_11-22-27.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_13-02-31.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_13-02-31.png
  573   Sun Jun 2 06:41:00 2024 CB, AGRun 21 - tests

07:41

Switching to bunched beam to check D vs H content.

8:24

 

Attach 1&2

ONE spill

Detectors fully out

Switched to bunched beam

12 seconds pre-acceleration

100x cycles (600 seconds) -

Loss over 600 seconds 3.97E7 ions to 3.40E7 ions, i.e. negligible.

 

Attach 3&4

Coasting beam

12 seconds pre-acc

100x cycles

 

Attch 5&6

Coasting beam

12 seconds pre-acc

100x cycles

Detectors pneumatics IN

 

Attach 7& 8

Coasting beam

6 seconds pre-acc

100x cycles

Detector pneumatics IN

 

Attach 8&9

Coasting beam

12 seconds pre acc

200x cycles

Detector pneumatics IN

Running in this configuration for the rest of the shift

Target is barely 1E11 atoms/cm2 and keeps decreasing

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-23-21.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-23-21.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-23-36.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-23-36.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-44-38.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-44-38.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-44-54.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-44-54.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-58-17.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-58-17.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-58-25.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-58-25.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-18-02.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-18-02.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-18-10.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-18-10.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-44-16.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-44-16.png
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-44-24.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-44-24.png
  572   Sat Jun 1 21:56:17 2024 JM, EM, EM, TY, CB, AGRun 20

22:56

Run 20 started - beam on target

Beam energy is 1.5 MeV. Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Target density ~ 1e11 at/cm2

Beam intensity at inj ~ 4e7

Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm =  64.60 mm

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Beam in the ring ~ 3minutes.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.

 

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

01:15

Target density has increased slighty: ~ 4e11 at/cm2 (update: this only lasted about 5 min)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

3:10

Target density has decresed slightly but will come back (hopefully) ~7e10 at/cm2.

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

05:15

Target density has been somewhat unstable, between ~7E10 and ~3E12 at/cm2.

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

07:37

Run continues. Target density still fluctuating around 1E11 atoms/cm2.

Temperatures OK. Merger OK. Rates OK.

System wide checks as before.

Waveforms OK. See attachments.

Some screenshots from the online analysis. We do not see a peak at 1 MeV. We do however clearly see more D than H2+.

Stopping run to make some tests.

 

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-05.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-05.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-46.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-46.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-01.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-01.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-22.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_03-11-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_03-11-55.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_03-12-00.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_03-12-00.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_05-14-40.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_05-14-40.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_05-15-00.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_05-15-00.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-28-30.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-28-30.png
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-30-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-30-22.png
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-31-21.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-31-21.png
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-03.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-03.png
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-21.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-21.png
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-42.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-42.png
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-49.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-49.png
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-33-00.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-33-00.png
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-33-45.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-33-45.png
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-36-41.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-36-41.png
  571   Sat Jun 1 16:38:13 2024 TDOffline analysis G22-201/R17
Offline analysis data file G22-201/R17

Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat

ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain

per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1
 DSSSD #2 spectrum is normal, DSSSD #1 and #3-4 display large multiplicities in p and/or n strips which are, presumably, non-physical events at DSSSD edge

For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8

per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
 note - x/y channel ordering to be checked

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
 gated w(1) & w(2)
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
 20keV/channel nominal
 log scale
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-31-53.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-31-53.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-16.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-16.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-58.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-58.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-34-44.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-34-44.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-36-06.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-36-06.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-37-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-37-22.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-39-06.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-39-06.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-40-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-40-22.png
  570   Sat Jun 1 13:33:50 2024 TDOffline analysis APR24/R3 (alpha background)
Offline analysis data file APR24/R3 (alpha background)

Run started 11:04 26.4.24
Run ended   09:44 29.4.24

Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat

ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain

per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1

For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8

per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
 note - x/y channel ordering to be checked

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
 gated w(1) & w(2)
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
 20keV/channel nominal

2D spectra z contours/colour map - attachment 9
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-24-17.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-24-17.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-25-05.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-25-05.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-10.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-10.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-51.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-51.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-29-43.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-29-43.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-32-16.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-32-16.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-33-31.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-33-31.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-39.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-39.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-57.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-57.png
  569   Sat Jun 1 07:16:15 2024 CB, AB, EM, JMRun 19 - beam target overlap

Morning shift

08:16 - as run 18, target off

9:00 Increased storage time to 5 minutes. Aquired data after initial beam loss. Attach 1 &2. Far less H2+ vs D.

Temps OK

Rates as before

10:00 beam being optimised to reduce 2H+ content

Rates in aida 13, 14 suddenly spike as during overnight. Checkloaded repeatedly. No effect. Increased thresholds in 13, 14 to 0x32 bringing them in line with 15,16.

12:50

We started test with beam

Test1 ( Attached 12-52-55)

Horiz. offset: 8mm

Max vuel on 1.5MeV =1480 counst

Test2

Horiz. offset: 7mm

 

Test3

Horiz. offset: 6mm

target density=2.4E11

 

Test4

Horiz. offset: 5mm

target density=from 1.7E11 to 2.5E11

 

Test5

Horiz. offset: 4mm

target density=from 5.6E11 to 1.1E11 several fluctuations

 

Test6

Horiz. offset: 3mm

target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations. Until now we do not see a clear  signel from the reaction!

 

Test7

Horiz. offset: 2mm

target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations.

 

Test8

 Beam back again. Coasting beam. Detectors IN

Horiz. offset: 8mm

xy and energy histograms - attachment 12 and 13.

 

Test9

Bunched beam Detectors IN

Horiz. offset: 8mm

xy and energy histograms - attachment 14 and 15.

 

Test10

Horiz. offset: 6mm

xy and energy histograms - attachment

target:1.6E11

xy and energy histograms - attachment 16 and 17.

Afternoon shift

From previous overlap tests we can see that moving the beam position does cause a change in the number of events observed in the detectors.

But the change in events appears to be due to beam halo hitting the detectors rather than elastic scattering. New approach required.

We have varied the beam position (horizontal) in 1mm steps from 0mm to 9mm (the maximum allowed). We do this with the target ON and then with the target OFF.

Integral of events ~1.5 MeV taken . Difference between the target and no target plotted to gauge overlap position.

Note we have moved left arm fully out as we were worried about beam hitting dssds on injection. Will check overlap with right dssds only as left dssds have very low rate at this position.

We have determined the overlap position is about 7.0mm horizontal

Attachment 18 shows initial scan.

Attachment 19 shows a second scan in the region we highlighted as possible overlap.

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-15-54.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-15-54.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-16-11.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-16-11.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-23-17.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-23-17.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-29-48.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-29-48.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-52-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-52-55.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-58-44.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-58-44.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-06-01.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-06-01.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-12-10.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-12-10.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-18-32.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-18-32.png
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-27-12.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-27-12.png
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-34-07.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-34-07.png
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-18-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-18-55.png
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-19-10.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-19-10.png
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-28-08.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-28-08.png
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-29-26.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-29-26.png
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-31.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-31.png
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-43.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-43.png
Attachment 18: Overlap1.png
Overlap1.png
Attachment 19: Overlap2.png
Overlap2.png
  568   Fri May 31 21:53:20 2024 CB EM, JM,EM ABOvernight beam tests

22:53

Run 15 started

Beam tests. We increased the storage time to 2min and switched to bunched beam so that we can see the beam lifetime over the cycle.

D+ Beam energy is set to 1.5 MeV.

Detectors are positioned in with servos only (left arm = 28.06mm, right arm = 29.23 mm)

No target

We observe a large peak at the start of the cycle at 750 keV. This seems to be molecular hydrogen circulating in the ring. We also see a much smaller peak at 1.5 MeV (D+)

After a period of time the 750 keV peak decreases significantly and we are left with the 1,5 MeV peak only. 

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 1

Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 2

We observe the large circular structure on the left hand detectors. Is this related to hydrogen or is it the beam type (bunched instead of coasting)?

In the GSI control plots for the number of ions in the ring we observe a large drop in ions circulating at the start of the cycle, and then remains fairly constant throughout the rest of the cycle. - attachment 3

This seems to confirm our hydrogen hypothesis.

23:54

Run 15 stopped, Run 16 started.

All setting the same and still no target, except beam is now coasting. We will compare to Run 15 after one hour of running.

We do not observe the circular distribution on the detector seen in the previous run. It seems this effect comes from the bunched beam. Reason?

We still observe the 750 keV peak at the start of the cycle.

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 4

Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 5

00:59

Run16 stopped. Run 17 started.

All settings the same except we have switched back to bunched beam.

Target now on. (X=-13700, Y=0). Target density ~ 1E11 at/cm2.

02:03

Run 17 continues

Target has increased in the average density to ~4e11 at/cm2, no changes made to nozzle position and fluctuates to 1e11 or 1e12 at/cm2.

Energy histograms and the xy plots appear similar to bunched beam with no target. The rates are slightly lower with the target for the left hand dssds, maybe target interactions destroy molecular hydrogen quicker?

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 6

Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 7

We will continue to run for another hour or so in this condition

Target density has decreased over the last minutes. We have tried to move the nozzle to maximise density but fluctuations make this difficult.

03:55

Increase in ADC data items statistics for aida 13 and 14 from ~20 kHz to 90 kHz

ASIC checkload has reduced the rates back to ~ 20 kHz

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 3 hour - attachment 8

Total xy plot after ~ 3 hour - attachment 9

Run 17 stopped. Run 18 started

Beam changed back to coasting. All other settings unchanged. Target on. 

04:55

Run 18 continues.

Energy histograms and the xy plots appear similar to bunched beam with no target. The rates are lower with the target than without.

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 10

Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 11

Note we observed fluctuations in the T2 temperature for the target. T2 is set to 80 K but rapid fluctuations were observed up to 100K. This occurred for only 5 minutes and I am not sure if it is a real effect.

 

07:20

Temperatures OK

System wide checks OK

Rates OK

Stats OK

Waveforms attached

Leakage current decreasing slightly.

No changes to beam or target.

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-52-25.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-52-25.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-51-56.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-51-56.png
Attachment 3: screenshot-2024-05-31_23-53-125456534733007473468.png
screenshot-2024-05-31_23-53-125456534733007473468.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-45.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-45.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-55.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-01-33.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-01-33.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-02-05.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-02-05.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-39.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-39.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-52.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-52.png
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-25.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-25.png
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-43.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-43.png
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-28.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-28.png
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-38.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-38.png
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-00.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-00.png
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-12.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-12.png
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-19-44.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-19-44.png
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-20-07.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-20-07.png
  567   Fri May 31 21:03:21 2024 CB, EMRun14

22:03

Before this run we checked quickly  beam with the target on but it does not make sense with the current status of the beam.

We removed target and starte Run14

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-05-57.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-05-57.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-01.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-01.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-49.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-49.png
ELOG V3.1.4-unknown