AIDA
GELINA
BRIKEN
nToF
CRIB
ISOLDE
CIRCE
nTOFCapture
DESPEC
DTAS
EDI_PSA
179Ta
CARME
StellarModelling
DCF
K40
DTAS
Draft saved at 00:00:00
Fields marked with
*
are required
Entry time:
Fri Nov 1 01:31:05 2024
Author
*
:
Subject
*
:
<p> <table width="98%" align="center" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid #486090;"> <tbody> <tr> <td cellpadding="3px" style="background-color:#486090; font-weidht:bold; color:white;">Quote:</td></tr> <tr> <td cellpadding="10px" style="background-color:#FFFFB0;"><p>Start: 16:25</p> <p>Stop: 17:25</p> <p>Background in the same conditions as before (right after the Co measurement)</p> <p>Listmode: Background_201905201614_035.dlt .... Background_201905201614_036.dlt</p> <p>Root file: 201905201725_background.root</p> <p>Rates:</p> <p>Dynodes: 8.5 kHz</p> <p>Anodes: 1.8 kHz</p> <p>Anod1: 120 Hz</p> <p>Anod15: 173 Hz</p> <p>Dynod1: 80 Hz</p> <p>Dynod 15: 166 Hz</p> <p>Pulser set to 10 Hz</p> <p>Rate of Dynode 5, 15, 17 seem a little higher than the others. The same for Anode 11, 15, 17</p> <p>Not clear why the Dynodes rate is so high compared with the anodes. There is not such a big</p> <p>difference in rate of the individual detectors. </p> <p>(Dynodes and Anodes rates are taken from the Python script written by Jorge, that correspond to the full card)</p> <p>Later it become evident that probably we need to increase the threshold of detector 8 again (Dy08).</p> <p>Before it was not like that, but now seems to be triggering in the noise.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </p><p> </p>
Encoding
:
HTML
ELCode
plain
Suppress Email notification
Attachment 1:
Drop attachments here...
Draft saved at 00:00:00
ELOG V3.1.4-unknown