AIDA GELINA BRIKEN nToF CRIB ISOLDE CIRCE nTOFCapture DESPEC DTAS EDI_PSA 179Ta CARME StellarModelling DCF K40
  DTAS, Page 7 of 8  ELOG logo
Entry  Thu May 30 06:46:10 2019, A. Algora, Background with beam 201905301448_background_AIDA_in.root201905301457_background_AIDA_in.root

Again a new test with the beam on. At the begining the beam was off and it can be noticed.

There is a lead wall after F11 plastic and in the polyethilene block there are two lead bricks to block the beam to AIDA.

201905301448_background_AIDA_in.root

201905301457_background_AIDA_in.root (beam was stopped for a short period)

Rates with the beam: 2.2 kHz (Dynodes), 2.3 (anodes)

 

 

I will not erase it and continue to collect root files (no lmd for the moment), they are still optimizing things. Rate at F11 should be similar to

the rate at F7 according to Pieter. Rate at F7 plastik  is 5 kHz. The plastik spectra (F11, our plastik) shows some spikes.

Entry  Thu May 30 07:21:41 2019, A. Algora, Background with beam on 

Start: 15:21

Stop: 16:41

Root: 201905301642_background_AIDA_in.root

Comments: they stopped the beam to put the target in

Entry  Thu May 30 08:43:29 2019, A. Algora, Background no beam 

Start: 16:43

Stop: 16:56

Root: 201905301656_background_AIDA_in.root

Comment: no beam, AIDA in

Rates: 1.5 kHz (Dynodes), 1.8 kHz (Anodes)

Entry  Thu May 30 08:57:34 2019, A. Algora, Background, no beam + beam, file not saved 

Start: 16:57

Stop:

Comments: first part no beam, but later with beam

Root: File not saved

Entry  Thu May 30 12:08:01 2019, A. Algora, background, dacq restarted before the measurement 201905311017_background_AIDA_in.root20190530_Conf.xlsx

Start: 20:09

Stop: 10:17

Root:  201905311017_background_AIDA_in.root

Comments: before this measurement  the system was restarted.

LED in EDy16 looks wider

The TACS were recovered. Probably all the files of today (until now) and generated after the configuration file change do not have the calibrated spectra.

Entry  Fri May 31 02:41:55 2019, A. Algora, Background, beam on 7x

Start: 10:42

Stop: 11:49

Root: 201905311149_background_AIDA_in.root

Comments:

 

Entry  Fri May 31 06:48:58 2019, A. Algora, T spectra for AIDA and F11 plastics 20190531_Conf_1.xlsx

T spectra for AIDAPL and F11PLL and F11PLR are defined from now on. The ancilliary card was not saving the CFD values for all channels.

It was modified in order to have those spectra. A new configuration file will be saved. See in the attachment

Entry  Fri May 31 07:03:37 2019, A. Algora, Background, beam on, rates at F11PL and AIDAPL Screenshot_from_2019-05-31_17-36-38.png

Start: 15:04

Stop: partial (17:43), 201905311743_background_AIDA_in.root (file corrupt again), system will be restarted

Root:

Comment: Figure shows the rate of F11PLR (black), F11PLL (lighter color, ??) and AIDAPL (blue). There are different counting rates in left and right of F11 plastic

Entry  Fri May 31 09:49:08 2019, A. Algora, Backgroun, beam on 

Start: 17:49

Stop: 22:11

Root: 201905312211_background_AIDA_in.root

Comments:

Entry  Fri May 31 14:17:13 2019, A. Algora, New config file 20190531_Conf_2.xlsx201905312230_background_AIDA_in.root

A new config file provided by Jose and Alvaro is loaded

cp 20190531_Conf_JLTAT.xlsx 20190531_Conf_2.xlsx

Comments: I have modified it afterwards to have TAIDAPL, the threshold in E was too high. The TAC_F11R_CryA was also modified. It is shifted in time and cut as it was.

It remains cut.

Short root file is attached as example

---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---...---

*Update*: some of the histograms saved from DACQ online are duplicated (same name, but different cycles: ";1" and ";2"), and the second copy is empty. When you open the ROOT file and write the name of the histogram, the last copy ("cycle") is called, so the empty histogram is displayed.

$ root -l 201905312230_background_AIDA_in.root
root [0]
Attaching file 201905312230_background_AIDA_in.root as _file0...
(TFile *) 0x238ac70
root [1] ESumA->Draw() //empty!

So, there are two options: delete the second copy of the histograms, or create a newer copy of the filled histograms. In order to perform the second option, please write this line,

$ root -l 201905312230_background_AIDA_in.root
root [0]
Attaching file 201905312230_background_AIDA_in.root as _file0...
(TFile *) 0x238ac70
root [1]  for (auto&& keyAsObj : *(_file0->GetListOfKeys())){auto key = (TKey*) keyAsObj; if( 1 == key->GetCycle())_file0->Get(Form("%s;%d",key->GetName(),1))->Clone(Form("%s;%d",key->GetName(),3));  }

root [2] ESumA->Draw() //copy of ESumA;1!

The changes will not persist unless the file is opened with "update" mode and the changes are saved at the end.

Alvaro.

Entry  Fri May 31 14:29:34 2019, A. Algora, Background with beam 201906011544_background_AIDA_in.root

Start: 22:29

Stop: 15:44 (next day)

Root: 201906011544_background_AIDA_in.root

Comments:

Entry  Sat Jun 1 07:59:20 2019, A. Algora, Background, no beam 201906011624_background_AIDA_in.root

Start: approximate 15:54

Stop: 16:23

Root: 201906011624_background_AIDA_in.root

Comment: No beam. AIDA in place

 

Entry  Sat Jun 1 08:25:47 2019, A. Algora, Background, without and with beam 7x

Start: 16:26

Stop: 17:20 (until then no beam),

Root1: 201906011720_background_AIDA_in.root (no beam, saved 17:20), nor erased

Root2: 201906011729_background_AIDA_in.root (no beam, saved 17:29), nor erased

Root3:201906011741_background_AIDA_in.root (no beam, saved 17:41), nor erased

Root4: 201906011800_background_AIDA_in.root (with beam at the end, saved 18:00), not erased

Comment: At the begining there was no beam, to see the difference. The lead bricks blocking the way to AIDA has been removed as well as the

polyethylene blocks. The lead wall after F11 plastic remains, and of course the lead shielding and the polyethylene shielding before the DTAS is not removed.

Only the blocks that were inside the holes were removed.

Beam arrived around 17:47, intensity at F7 is 3.3 kHz, at F11 of the order of 2.4 kHz, at Aida plastic of the order of 2 kHz after substracting. The beam is centered at 102Sn, but there are a lot of other staff comming through

the noise level.

The increase in the counting rate of the NaI is very small.

Rates with NO BEAM: Dynodes 1.6 kHz, Anodes 1.9 kHz

Rates with BEAM: Dynodes 1.7 kHz, Anodes 1.9 kHz

File with guaranted no beam saved at 17:20 (201906011720_background_AIDA_in.root)

Another one saved at 17:29 (201906011729_background_AIDA_in.root), no beam also, still waiting, similarly saved at 17:41

Attachment 7 shows the rates of TF11PL (black), TCryA (blue), and TAIDAPL (the other color ?). it shows the "noise" level of the AIDA PL, and the increase in the counting

rate of the crystals.

 

Entry  Sat Jun 1 10:04:54 2019, A. Algora, background with beam 201906012227_background_AIDA_in.rootScreenshot_from_2019-06-01_22-29-51.png

Start: 18:05

Stop: 22:27

Comments: Rate at F7: 3,3 kHz, rate at F11 (according to the in-beam team approx. 2.4 kHz)

Root: 201906012227_background_AIDA_in.root

In the graph: F11PL R and L, below Aida pl, below TCryA

Entry  Sat Jun 1 14:31:24 2019, A. Algora, Background, beam on 201906021918_background_AIDA_in.root

Start: 22:32

Stop: 19:18 (next day)

Comments: According to Tom, the number of ligth particles in AIDA is small

Root:201906021918_background_AIDA_in.root

Entry  Sun Jun 2 11:23:23 2019, A. Algora, Background, beam on 201906022028_background_AIDA_in.root

Start: 19:24

Stop: 20:27

Root: 201906022028_background_AIDA_in.root

Lmd:201906021924_background_AIDA_beam_on_234.dlt ..201906021924_background_AIDA_beam_on_237.dlt

Comments:  For a short period lmd file will be collected as well, to have correlations in case it is needed. Rate at F7 4 kHz

Entry  Sun Jun 2 12:31:45 2019, A. Algora, Background, beam on 

Start: 20:32

Stop: 09;44

Root: 201906030944_background_AIDA_in.root

Comment: beam until 09;00

Entry  Mon Jun 3 01:45:31 2019, A. Algora, Background, no beam for a period 

Start: 09:45

Stop (partial save): 09:55, 10:00, 10:14,10:29,10:37,10:46

Root: 201906030955_background_AIDA_in.root (no beam, not erased), 201906031000_background_AIDA_in.root (no beam, not erased),

201906031014_background_AIDA_in.root(no beam, not erased), 201906031029_background_AIDA_in.root(no beam, not erased),

201906031037_background_AIDA_in.root(no beam, not erased),201906031046_background_AIDA_in.root(no beam, not erased)

201906031135_background_AIDA_in.root (with beam at the end)

At 10:43 or so, a Synch pulse was sent

Intensity of the beam has been increased. There is a clear increase of the background. Rates 3.2 kHz (dynodes), 3.3 (anodes).

9 kHz at F11 plastic, 9 kHz at F7

Entry  Mon Jun 3 03:37:10 2019, A. Algora, Background, beam on 2019060312047_background_AIDA_in.root

Start:11:36

Stop: 20:47

Root: 2019060312047_background_AIDA_in.root

 

102Sn beam, empty target run, Rate at F7 9 kHz

Entry  Mon Jun 3 12:56:06 2019, A. Algora, New configuration file 20190603_Conf.xlsx

The E range of the AIDA plastic for the construction of the TAIDA plastic spectrum has been changed. Also the range of the TAC_AIDAPL_CryA has been changed.

The estimated range of AIDA was based on the file 201906011624_background_AIDA_in.root, which was with no beam. But I am not sure is the calibration of 

AIDAPL is fine.

ELOG V3.1.3-7933898