The variations of MACS distribution of K41+nwith different level density models. K41+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.022 MeV.

The variations of MACS distribution of K39+nwith different level density models. K39+ncannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.028 MeV.

1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Cl35+n with rebinned total. Experimental cross section is around 12 while the graph shows the maximum probability as around 7.

2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.

3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10.

4. This is the TALYS output for Cl35+n.

5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S).

1 -> macs.root: MACS distribution file

2 -> read.C: file to graph the histogram

3 -> list.dat: reads every run done by mygoe.f

4 -> talys.input: TALYS inputs

5 -> talys.output: output parameters for mygoe.f

6 -> Na24run: to run mygoe.f for Na23+n parameters taken from TALYS

The variations of MACS distribution of Cl36+n with different level density models. Cl36+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below approx. 0.020 MeV.

Cl36-10 and -42.

The variations of MACS distribution of Cl35+n with different level density models. Cl35+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model belowe 0.026 MeV.

The variations of MACS distribution of Ca45+n with different level density models. Ca45+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below approx. 0.020 MeV.

Ca45-20 and -42.

The variations of MACS distribution of Ca42+n with different nuclear models generated by TALYS. When the level density is high enough, the resonances seem to decrease as TALYS obeys the statistical model.

The variations of MACS distribution of Ar37+n with different level density models. Ar37+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.022 MeV.

Ar37-13 and -42.