| ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
|
32
|
Thu Jul 13 14:19:37 2023 |
Claudia | dead time 30Si run |
Default TTOFSort dead time setting of 30 ns is ok. |
|
4
|
Mon Oct 28 16:15:32 2019 |
Ruchi | Zn68 measurement setup |
|
|
55
|
Wed Nov 8 11:47:44 2023 |
AR | Zn68 TTOFSort codes |
|
|
65
|
Tue Apr 16 15:24:45 2024 |
AR | Zn68 Analysis: Au resonance SAMMY fits |
|
|
60
|
Fri Mar 1 14:35:04 2024 |
AR | Zn updated wartime v weighted plots |
Updated plots with new WFs. Rebinned by 10. |
|
67
|
Mon Sep 9 11:06:19 2024 |
AR | Zn update slides 06/08/2024 |
|
|
68
|
Mon Oct 7 14:07:26 2024 |
AR | Zn update slides 04/10 |
Models Vs Resonance amp spectra |
|
43
|
Fri Aug 4 10:45:05 2023 |
Annie | Zn Plots: Normalised Spectra, Ratio Plots, Integral/Protons vs Cut (all dets) |
All plots in the ratios all look pretty contstant. Zn1 for all detectors seems to have some strange spike in the integral, and a dip in the SILI measurements (and therefore in the SILI/PKUP ratio).
Det1 & Det4 dont look great for the Integral/Proton plots, im planning to make these plots with the PKUP protons and SILI and then comapre all of those errors and ratios that come from those, so we'll see what that comparison brings.
Nothing has been seperated by dedicated or paracitic beam yet, so those comparisons need to be made too. |
|
57
|
Thu Nov 30 14:43:28 2023 |
AR | Zn + Au Background subtraction: Plots |
Plots for Zn and Au with Empty subtracted, and compared to weighted spectra.
Note: Au are logged x and y, Zn is only logged x. |
|
51
|
Tue Oct 24 11:29:46 2023 |
AR | Weighted Histograms Vs Deadtime*Corrected: 68Zn |
|
|
59
|
Tue Feb 27 11:37:39 2024 |
AR | Updated Au Deadtime Corrected Spectra & Weighted Spectra Plots |
Plots made with new weighting functions. All rebinned by 10.
Attatchments 1-4: Detector 1.
Attatchments 5-8: Detector 2.
Attatchments 9-12: Detector 3. |
|
8
|
Fri Aug 7 10:39:18 2020 |
Ruchi | TTOFSort processing macro and files path |
/eos/user/r/rugarg/public/2017_10_ng_ZnSe/
Latest 4 processing scripts:
1. process_runs_Au1_Jul20.C = Au runs (Se78 part), empty holder runs (Se78 part), and beam-off runs (Se78 part) processed with Au weighting function and set1 of calibration parameters.
2. process_runs_Au2_Jul20.C = Au runs (Se77 part), empty holder runs (Se77 part), and beam-off runs (Se77 part) processed with Au weighting function and set2 of calibration parameters.
3. process_runs_Se78_Jul20.C = Se78 runs, empty holder runs, beam-off runs, C runs, and filter runs processed with Se78 weighting function and set1 of calibration parameters.
4. process_runs_Se77_Jul20.C = Se77 runs, empty holder runs, beam-off runs, and filter runs processed with Se77 weighting function and set2 of calibration parameters. |
|
15
|
Mon Sep 14 13:47:26 2020 |
Nikolay Sosnin | Summed WF: Monday Meeting 14.09.2020 |
|
|
34
|
Mon Jul 17 10:06:35 2023 |
Nikolay Sosnin | State of the Union: Campaign Update 17.07.2023 |
EAR1: Si-nat sample fell off the holder during maintenance (before run 116544), appears intact and undamaged. Placed it back in-beam for further EAR1 measurements and subsequent transfer to EAR2.
EAR2: Replaced DUMMY with 30Si. Photo during alignment and photo of sample in holder attached. |
|
36
|
Mon Jul 17 12:30:28 2023 |
Nikolay Sosnin | Si-nat Goodfellow Sample Properties |
Goodfellow sample has been deposited on a single Mylar foil and glue is drying.
mass = 2.932 g
diameter = 20.0 mm
thickness = 3.98 mm |
|
52
|
Fri Oct 27 17:13:58 2023 |
Emma Walker | Si-30: Dedicated vs Parasitic before and after removal of ambient |
Below are histograms for the weighted spectra (with deadtime correction) with and without ambient for C6D6 detector 1.
For each sample the histogram with ambient is first and then without ambient (please ignore histogram titles).
The Dummy, Empty and C-nat have been rebined by combining 100 to 1.
The Au20, Au22, Si-30 and Sinatgood have been rebined by combining 10 to 1.
Si-30 WF used for: Si-30, Dummy, Empty, C-nat
Au20 WF used for: Au20
Au22 WF used for: Au22
Sinatgood WF used for: Sinatgood |
|
54
|
Tue Nov 7 13:21:51 2023 |
Emma Walker | Si-30: Comparison between background corrected and uncorrected |
Below are graphs for the comparison between background corrected and uncorrected spectra (weighted) for Si-30, Au20, Au22 and Sinatgood.
This is just for C6D6 detector 1 but all detectors are consisitent. All histograms have been rebinned by 100 for clarity. |
|
50
|
Mon Oct 23 12:47:16 2023 |
Emma Walker | Si-30 weighted and corrected spectra and deadtime correction histograms (parasitic) |
Si-30:
Histograms for deadtime correction for all 4 C6D6 detectors for parasitic beam.
Histograms for weighted and deadtime corrected parasitic spectra. |
|
49
|
Mon Oct 23 12:39:33 2023 |
Emma Walker | Si-30 corrected weighted and dead time corrections histograms (dedicated) |
Si-30:
Histograms for dead time corrections for all 4 C6D6 detectors.
Histograms for weighted and deadtime corrected dedicated spectra. |
|
63
|
Tue Mar 26 11:04:29 2024 |
AR | Si-29 and Si-28 sample images and info |
Sample information Excel sheet attached below.
Images 1-6: Si-29 sample
Images 6-10: Si-28 sample
Image 11: screenshot from Excel sheet for Si-29
Image 12: screenshot from Excel sheet for Si-28
Image 13: screenshot from Excel sheet for Dummy
Both samples were only able to be weighed inside the capsule as they were very crumbly and unable to be weighed alone (see images). The capsule was weighed before the sample was put in it and thus the mass of Si can be found by subtracting the capsule mass from the measured mass.
Average mass Si-29: 0.8568g pm 0.0002
Average mass Si-28: 0.9551 pm 0.0002
Average mass Dummy: 0.0765 pm 0.0001
|