|
AIDA
GELINA
BRIKEN
nToF
CRIB
ISOLDE
CIRCE
nTOFCapture
DESPEC
DTAS
EDI_PSA
179Ta
CARME
StellarModelling
DCF
K40
|
AIDA |
 |
|
Message ID: 887
Entry time: Sat Aug 19 14:52:42 2023
|
Author: |
TD |
Subject: |
BNC PB-4 & BNC PB-5 pulser test - JCMB 18.8.23 |
|
|
BNC PB-4 - see attachment 1
Amplitude 35,000
Attenuators all OUT
Risetime 50ns
Decay time 1ms
Tail pulse
Polarity +
Frequency 2Hz (min)
Delay min
DSO ch#1 DC/1M - y: 5mV/div x: 100ns, 200ns, 1us, 2us & 10us/div - attachments 2-6
BNC PB-5 - see attachment 7-9
Amplitude 1.0V
Attenuation x1
Decay time 1ms
Tail pulse
Polarity +
Frequency 2Hz (min)
Delay 250ns (min)
DSO ch#1 DC/1M - y: 5mV/div x: 100ns, 200ns, 1us, 2us & 10us/div - attachments 10-14
BNC PB-5 - see attachment 15-16
Amplitude 10.0V
Attenuation x10
Decay time 1ms
Tail pulse
Polarity +
Frequency 2Hz (min)
Delay 250ns (min)
DSO ch#1 DC/1M - y: 5mV/div x: 100ns, 200ns, 1us, 2us & 10us/div - attachments 17-21
Conclusion
BNC PB-5 significantly noisier than BNC PB-4. Results consistent with GSI tests https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/AIDA/886 , i.e. AIDA BNC PB-5 pulser at GSI *not* faulty.
BNC PB-5 operation with 10.0V/10x ( cf. 1.0V/x1 ) shows lower level of noise but still worse than BNC PB-4.
5mV transient at test input ( C_t = 0.7pF ) = 3.5fC = 80keV Si equivalent ( check 1V x 0.7pF = 0.7pC = 16MeV OK ). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|