22:56

Run 20 started - beam on target

Beam energy is 1.5 MeV. Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Target density ~ 1e11 at/cm2

Beam intensity at inj ~ 4e7

Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm =  64.60 mm

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Beam in the ring ~ 3minutes.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

01:15

Target density has increased slighty: ~ 4e11 at/cm2 (update: this only lasted about 5 min)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

3:10

Target density has decresed slightly but will come back (hopefully) ~7e10 at/cm2.

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

Offline analysis data file G22-201/R17

Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat

ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain

per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1
 DSSSD #2 spectrum is normal, DSSSD #1 and #3-4 display large multiplicities in p and/or n strips which are, presumably, non-physical events at DSSSD edge

For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8

per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
 note - x/y channel ordering to be checked

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
 gated w(1) & w(2)
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
 20keV/channel nominal
 log scale

Offline analysis data file APR24/R3 (alpha background)

Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat

ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain

per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1

For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8

per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
 note - x/y channel ordering to be checked

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
 gated w(1) & w(2)
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
 20keV/channel nominal

2D spectra z contours/colour map - attachment 9

08:16 - as run 18, target off

9:00 Increased storage time to 5 minutes. Aquired data after initial beam loss. Attach 1 &2. Far less H2+ vs D.

Temps OK

Rates as before

10:00 beam being optimised to reduce 2H+ content

Rates in aida 13, 14 suddenly spike as during overnight. Checkloaded repeatedly. No effect. Increased thresholds in 13, 14 to 0x32 bringing them in line with 15,16.

12:50

We started test with beam

Test1 ( Attached 12-52-55)

Horiz. offset: 8mm

Max vuel on 1.5MeV =1480 counst

Test2

Horiz. offset: 7mm

Test3

Horiz. offset: 6mm

target density=2.4E11

Test4

Horiz. offset: 5mm

target density=from 1.7E11 to 2.5E11

Test5

Horiz. offset: 4mm

target density=from 5.6E11 to 1.1E11 several fluctuations

Test6

Horiz. offset: 3mm

target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations. Until now we do not see a clear  signel from the reaction!

Test7

Horiz. offset: 2mm

target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations.

Test8

 Beam back again. Coasting beam. Detectors IN

Horiz. offset: 8mm

xy and energy histograms - attachment 12 and 13.

Test9

Bunched beam Detectors IN

Horiz. offset: 8mm

xy and energy histograms - attachment 14 and 15.

Test10

Horiz. offset: 6mm

xy and energy histograms - attachment

target:1.6E11

xy and energy histograms - attachment 16 and 17.