AIDA GELINA BRIKEN nToF CRIB ISOLDE CIRCE nTOFCapture DESPEC DTAS EDI_PSA 179Ta CARME StellarModelling DCF K40
  CARME, Last 2 days  ELOG logo
ID Date Author Subject
  572   Sat Jun 1 21:56:17 2024 JM, EM, EM, TYRun 20

22:56

Run 20 started - beam on target

Beam energy is 1.5 MeV. Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.

Target density ~ 1e11 at/cm2

Beam intensity at inj ~ 4e7

Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm =  64.60 mm

Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.

Beam in the ring ~ 3minutes.

Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.

 

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

01:15

Target density has increased slighty: ~ 4e11 at/cm2 (update: this only lasted about 5 min)

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

 

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-05.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-05.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-46.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-46.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-01.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-01.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-22.png
  571   Sat Jun 1 16:38:13 2024 TDOffline analysis G22-201/R17
Offline analysis data file G22-201/R17

Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat

ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain

per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1
 DSSSD #2 spectrum is normal, DSSSD #1 and #3-4 display large multiplicities in p and/or n strips which are, presumably, non-physical events at DSSSD edge

For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8

per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
 note - x/y channel ordering to be checked

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
 gated w(1) & w(2)
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
 20keV/channel nominal
 log scale
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-31-53.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-31-53.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-16.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-16.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-58.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-33-58.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-34-44.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-34-44.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-36-06.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-36-06.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-37-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-37-22.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-39-06.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-39-06.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-40-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_08-40-22.png
  570   Sat Jun 1 13:33:50 2024 TDOffline analysis APR24/R3 (alpha background)
Offline analysis data file APR24/R3 (alpha background)

Sort program variables https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/240530_180659/variables.dat

ADC data corrected for ADC offset but not gain

per DSSSD m_p verus m_n - attachment 1

For spectra below events must satisfy condition 0 < m_p < 8 *and* 0 < m_n < 8

per DSSSD p+n junction strip versus n+n Ohmic strip - attachment 2
 note - x/y channel ordering to be checked

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 3
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD E_p versus E_n - attachment 4
 gated w(1) & w(2)
 20keV/channel nominal

per DSSSD projection of gated E_p versus E_n spectra - attachments 5-8
 20keV/channel nominal

2D spectra z contours/colour map - attachment 9
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-24-17.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-24-17.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-25-05.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-25-05.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-10.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-10.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-51.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-26-51.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-29-43.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-29-43.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-32-16.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-32-16.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-33-31.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-33-31.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-39.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-39.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-57.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_05-34-57.png
  569   Sat Jun 1 07:16:15 2024 CB, AB, EMrun 19

08:16 - as run 18, target off

9:00 Increased storage time to 5 minutes. Aquired data after initial beam loss. Attach 1 &2. Far less H2+ vs D.

Temps OK

Rates as before

10:00 beam being optimised to reduce 2H+ content

Rates in aida 13, 14 suddenly spike as during overnight. Checkloaded repeatedly. No effect. Increased thresholds in 13, 14 to 0x32 bringing them in line with 15,16.

12:50

We started test with beam

Test1 ( Attached 12-52-55)

Horiz. offset: 8mm

Max vuel on 1.5MeV =1480 counst

Test2

Horiz. offset: 7mm

 

Test3

Horiz. offset: 6mm

target density=2.4E11

 

Test4

Horiz. offset: 5mm

target density=from 1.7E11 to 2.5E11

 

Test5

Horiz. offset: 4mm

target density=from 5.6E11 to 1.1E11 several fluctuations

 

Test6

Horiz. offset: 3mm

target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations. Until now we do not see a clear  signel from the reaction!

 

Test7

Horiz. offset: 2mm

target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations.

 

Test8

 Beam back again. Coasting beam. Detectors IN

Horiz. offset: 8mm

xy and energy histograms - attachment 12 and 13.

 

Test9

Bunched beam Detectors IN

Horiz. offset: 8mm

xy and energy histograms - attachment 14 and 15.

 

Test10

Horiz. offset: 6mm

xy and energy histograms - attachment

target:1.6E11

xy and energy histograms - attachment 16 and 17.

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-15-54.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-15-54.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-16-11.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-16-11.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-23-17.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-23-17.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-29-48.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-29-48.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-52-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-52-55.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-58-44.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-58-44.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-06-01.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-06-01.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-12-10.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-12-10.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-18-32.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-18-32.png
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-27-12.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-27-12.png
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-34-07.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-34-07.png
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-18-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-18-55.png
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-19-10.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-19-10.png
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-28-08.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-28-08.png
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-29-26.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-29-26.png
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-31.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-31.png
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-43.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-43.png
  568   Fri May 31 21:53:20 2024 CB EM, JM,EM ABOvernight beam tests

22:53

Run 15 started

Beam tests. We increased the storage time to 2min and switched to bunched beam so that we can see the beam lifetime over the cycle.

D+ Beam energy is set to 1.5 MeV.

Detectors are positioned in with servos only (left arm = 28.06mm, right arm = 29.23 mm)

No target

We observe a large peak at the start of the cycle at 750 keV. This seems to be molecular hydrogen circulating in the ring. We also see a much smaller peak at 1.5 MeV (D+)

After a period of time the 750 keV peak decreases significantly and we are left with the 1,5 MeV peak only. 

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 1

Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 2

We observe the large circular structure on the left hand detectors. Is this related to hydrogen or is it the beam type (bunched instead of coasting)?

In the GSI control plots for the number of ions in the ring we observe a large drop in ions circulating at the start of the cycle, and then remains fairly constant throughout the rest of the cycle. - attachment 3

This seems to confirm our hydrogen hypothesis.

23:54

Run 15 stopped, Run 16 started.

All setting the same and still no target, except beam is now coasting. We will compare to Run 15 after one hour of running.

We do not observe the circular distribution on the detector seen in the previous run. It seems this effect comes from the bunched beam. Reason?

We still observe the 750 keV peak at the start of the cycle.

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 4

Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 5

00:59

Run16 stopped. Run 17 started.

All settings the same except we have switched back to bunched beam.

Target now on. (X=-13700, Y=0). Target density ~ 1E11 at/cm2.

02:03

Run 17 continues

Target has increased in the average density to ~4e11 at/cm2, no changes made to nozzle position and fluctuates to 1e11 or 1e12 at/cm2.

Energy histograms and the xy plots appear similar to bunched beam with no target. The rates are slightly lower with the target for the left hand dssds, maybe target interactions destroy molecular hydrogen quicker?

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 6

Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 7

We will continue to run for another hour or so in this condition

Target density has decreased over the last minutes. We have tried to move the nozzle to maximise density but fluctuations make this difficult.

03:55

Increase in ADC data items statistics for aida 13 and 14 from ~20 kHz to 90 kHz

ASIC checkload has reduced the rates back to ~ 20 kHz

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 3 hour - attachment 8

Total xy plot after ~ 3 hour - attachment 9

Run 17 stopped. Run 18 started

Beam changed back to coasting. All other settings unchanged. Target on. 

04:55

Run 18 continues.

Energy histograms and the xy plots appear similar to bunched beam with no target. The rates are lower with the target than without.

Total energy histogram after running for ~ 1 hour - attachment 10

Total xy plot after ~ 1 hour - attachment 11

Note we observed fluctuations in the T2 temperature for the target. T2 is set to 80 K but rapid fluctuations were observed up to 100K. This occurred for only 5 minutes and I am not sure if it is a real effect.

 

07:20

Temperatures OK

System wide checks OK

Rates OK

Stats OK

Waveforms attached

Leakage current decreasing slightly.

No changes to beam or target.

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-52-25.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-52-25.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-51-56.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_23-51-56.png
Attachment 3: screenshot-2024-05-31_23-53-125456534733007473468.png
screenshot-2024-05-31_23-53-125456534733007473468.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-45.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-45.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_00-59-55.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-01-33.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-01-33.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-02-05.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_02-02-05.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-39.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-39.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-52.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_03-54-52.png
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-25.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-25.png
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-43.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_04-54-43.png
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-28.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-28.png
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-38.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-17-38.png
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-00.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-00.png
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-12.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-18-12.png
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-19-44.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-19-44.png
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-20-07.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_07-20-07.png
  567   Fri May 31 21:03:21 2024 CB, EMRun14

22:03

Before this run we checked quickly  beam with the target on but it does not make sense with the current status of the beam.

We removed target and starte Run14

Merger OK, Tape server OK

ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK

FEE temperatures look OK

System checks OK

Leakage current stable

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-05-57.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-05-57.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-01.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-01.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-49.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_22-07-49.png
  566   Fri May 31 19:12:01 2024 CB, EMRun 13 - test with beam

20:00

The beam is set at the correct energy, operators cross-checked it again. What we see  at 750 is due to the molecular beam.  The operotors are trying to optimize and get rid of this in the next 30min.

Temps and system checks OK

Leakage current OK

Merger and tape server OK

Potentiometer at 28.06 mm and 29.23 mm

20:30

Keep going with the beam tests. A new peak appears around 950 keV( See attached). Still try to understand what it is. The operators keep going

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-13-46.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-13-46.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-27-58.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-27-58.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-32-59.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-32-59.png
  565   Fri May 31 06:01:55 2024 JM, TY, PW, EM, CBRun 12 - beam on target

07:00

Run 12 started. D+ beam is incident on the target at 1.5 MeV

Beam intensity in the ring is ~4e7 particles

Target density shows some fluctuations but is ~1e11 atoms/cm2. Target temp 35K

Detectors are positioned fully out (Left arm 18.86mm and right arm 19.8 mm ) and are not moving

Ring pressure looks OK, YR09 E target sensor seems unaffected by the target currently reads ~5e-11 mbar.

Beam is in the ring for ~15s.

Temps and system checks OK

Leakage current OK

Merger and tape server OK

Horizontal beam position 8 mm and vertical beam position 0mm for overlap with target.

Statistics - attachment 1

Energy histogram - attachment 2

XY plot - attachment 3

We see high rate at 1.5 MeV in left dssds but very little in right dssds. XY plots also show counts are concerntrated in a very circular distribution.

07:15

Gleb has just called and requires access to the cave to check on a turbo pump in the source.

Ring vacuum looks good

Beam will be down for 10-15 minutes only hopefully. 

07:45

Beam is back in the ring but injection requires optimisation.

09:00

There are some issues with the source that require a few hours to resolve. Potentially until 7 or 8 pm tonight. We have about an hour before work starts.

We have done a quick test of the motors and moved the left and right arms in using the pnuematic only.

New position left arm = 62.71 mm , right arm = 64.6 mm.

We observed the rates in left detectors went up significantly. In the right detectors we observed little increase.

See attached xy plot - attachment 4

See attached energy histogram - attachment 5

Beam intensity has dropped significantly - below 1e6 particles so even at in positons we see few counts at the moment.

09:25

Source has degraded pretty rapidly so beam will be stopped for now.

Detectors moved back out.

Target nozzle moved from X= -13000, Y=2500 to X= -11000, Y=2500. S1 has dropped to 5e-10 mbar.

Note Gleb mentioned that last night it was likely a large proportion of the ions stored were molecular hydrogen not deuterium.

16:18

Temps and system checks OK

Leakage current OK

Merger and tape server OK

 

18:10

Temps and system checks OK

Leakage current OK

Merger and tape server OK

 

19:38

Operators are trying to optimize some beam. For now the beam is lower than it should be probably because is easy to work with the source like that.

Temps and system checks OK

Leakage current OK

Merger and tape server OK


 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_07-32-33.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_07-32-33.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_07-33-19.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_07-33-19.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_07-33-57.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_07-33-57.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_09-17-08.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_09-17-08.png
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_09-21-40.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_09-21-40.png
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_16-19-29.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_16-19-29.png
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_16-29-22.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_16-29-22.png
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_16-31-36.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_16-31-36.png
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_18-12-36.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_18-12-36.png
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_19-42-42.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_19-42-42.png
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_19-45-55.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_19-45-55.png
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-04-54.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-04-54.png
ELOG V3.1.4-unknown