Excel Sheet of results, orange ones are nuclei that required both TALYS and mygoe.f. This file is colour coded - can be seen below the table.

K43-13 and -42.

Ar37-13 and -42.

Cl36-10 and -42.

Ca45-20 and -42.

This is the Excel sheet with the list of nuclei and their corresponding MACS. Yellow fill shows the nuclei with experimental cross sections, green fill shows the nuclei that obey the statistical calculations and blue fill shows the nuclei with the Gaussian distributions.

The variations of MACS distribution of K43+nwith different level density models. K43+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.025 MeV.

The variations of MACS distribution of Ca45+n with different level density models. Ca45+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below approx. 0.020 MeV.

The variations of MACS distribution of K41+nwith different level density models. K41+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.022 MeV.

The variations of MACS distribution of K39+nwith different level density models. K39+ncannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.028 MeV.

The variations of MACS distribution of Ar37+n with different level density models. Ar37+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.022 MeV.

The variations of MACS distribution of Cl36+n with different level density models. Cl36+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below approx. 0.020 MeV.

The variations of MACS distribution of Cl35+n with different level density models. Cl35+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model belowe 0.026 MeV.

The variations of MACS distribution of P31+n with different nuclear models generated by TALYS.

The variations of MACS distribution of Ca42+n with different nuclear models generated by TALYS. When the level density is high enough, the resonances seem to decrease as TALYS obeys the statistical model.

1 -> macs.root: MACS distribution file

2 -> read.C: file to graph the histogram

3 -> list.dat: reads every run done by mygoe.f

4 -> talys.input: TALYS inputs

5 -> talys.output: output parameters for mygoe.f

6 -> Na24run: to run mygoe.f for Na23+n parameters taken from TALYS

This is the parameters of Ca42+n and Ca50+n acquired from differen models. They were chosen as they have Gaussian distributions which are consistent with TALYS calculations of MACS. Ca42+n has experimental values while Ca50+n does not.

1. This graph is Ne22+n with a log scale. Theorotical cross section is around 0.05 while the experimental is 0.061, which matches relatively well.

2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with log scale.

3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with log scale.

4. This is the TALYS output for Ne22+n.

5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S).

1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Ca43+n with rebinned to 10 total. Theorotical cross section is around 110 while the experimental is 66.1.

2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.

3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10.

4. This is the TALYS output for Ca43+n.

5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S).

1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Ca42+n with rebinned to 10 total. Theorotical cross section is around 15 while the experimental is 16.5, which matches well.

2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.

3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10.

4. This is the TALYS output for Ca42+n.

5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S).

1. This graph is fitted P31+n with rebinned to 10. Theorotical cross section is around 2 and the experimental value is 1.74, which relatively match.

2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.

3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10.

4. This is the TALYS output for P31+n.

5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S).

1. This graph is the exponential decay Si28+n total. Theorotical cross section is between 0-1.5 while the experimental should be towards 1.15

2. This the the distribution of l = 0.

3. This the the distribution of l = 1.

4. This is the TALYS output for Si28+n.

5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S).

1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Cl35+n with rebinned total. Experimental cross section is around 12 while the graph shows the maximum probability as around 7.

2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.

3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10.

4. This is the TALYS output for Cl35+n.

5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S).

Cross Section Distributions for Cl35+n; where macs01 is for l=0, macs11 is for l=1and macs1 is for the total. The most probable value is less than what is expected (around 13 in the EXCEL sheet).

Cross Section Distributions for Na23+n;where macs01 is for l=0, macs11 is for l=1and macs1 is for the total. This is an example of logarithmic decline due to high level spacing (stable nuclei).

Cross Section Distributions for Cl37+n; where macs01 is for l=0, macs11 is for l=1 and macs1 is for the total. This is an example of Gaussian-like behaviour.

These are the parameters taken from TALYS to further utilize them as inputs for MyGOE.f - generating nuclear levels. In the sheet the masses are target + n while the input mass is the target nuclei.