|
ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
|
529
|
Tue Dec 6 06:38:46 2016 |
TD, Updated Patrick | CAEN N1419 HV output common mode noise |
There appears to be significant common mode noise on the output of the
CAEN N1419 4 Ch Reversible 500 V/200 µA NIM HV Power Supply Module (USB)
- the specification quotes 'Max Ripple smaller than < 5mVpp'. We configure
the CAEN N1419 outputs as floating wrt NIM module/crate chassis.
For example, attachment 1, shows the output of module #2 (Addr 01) channel #3
(unused channel) set to 10V (leakage current 0.030uA) - core (Ch 1)/braid (Ch 2).
Tektronix 3034C channels 1 & 2 are both set ac/1M.
Attachment 2 shows math function Ch 1 - Ch 2 (50mV/division cf. 200mV/division
for Ch 1 and Ch 2)
Attachment 3 shows CAEN N1419 #2 settings
Attachment 4 per attachments 1 & 2 *except* the cables from channels 0 and 1
of CAEN N1419 #2 have been disconnected from the NIM module. The structure of
the common mode noise changes but its amplitude remains significant. This
presumably indicates that there are other sources of common mode noise in
addition to that observed at the output of the CAEN N1419 HV outputs.
Attachments 5 & 6 show the NIM crate front panel +6V output wrt ground
for the lower (NIM Bin type REPIC, BNC PB-4, Ortec 433, 2x MACB, 2x CAEN N1419,
1x CAEN 1419B) and upper (NIM Bin type OKEN, 9x MACB) AIDA NIM bins respectively.
All +/-24V, +/-12V and +/-6V front panel outputs show the same noise structure.
Attachment 7 shows equivalent of attachment 6 but using Tektronix DPO3054
which can display FFT.
Update -----------------------------------------
Tested the CAEN HV supply in T9 using the same method and observed similar results.
With help from Mos Kogimtzis a better method of measuring the HV noise was used.
The co-ax from the isolated output of the HV module was connected to one input of the 'scope. HV set to 1V.
Thus the screen of the HV signal is grounded at the 'scope amplifier input. This nearer to how the HV is used with a detector.
The single signal input channel was set to DC 1MR with an offset of 1V.
The 'scope can now display at 4mV/division.
The peak/peak was less than 5mV.See attachment 8 slide 1
There are features at both high and low frequency, attachments slides 2 and 3. NB 1mV/division.
If a differential measurement is required then a suitable cable with a shielded twisted pair is needed.
Update #2 -----------------------------------------
Moved the AIDA T9 HV supply to a CAEN NIM bin. Newly purchased this year.
This is the only module in the bin.
Used the simple method of noise measuring as before with the same cables and 'scope.
Attachment 9 shows there is a different type of noise. Not regular like attachment 8 but more random and larger.
The HV is set to 1V.
Further investigation will be carried out using AC coupling and HV set to 50V. |
Attachment 1: 200.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 201.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 202.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 203.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 210.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 211.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 220.png
|
|
Attachment 8: HV_noise.pdf
|
|
Attachment 9: HV_Noise_Caen_in_Caen.pdf
|
|
|
528
|
Tue Dec 6 02:30:35 2016 |
TD | Report - low - significant variation in FEE64 boot times |
Not something we were not aware of already but /var/log/messages illustrate the issue.
Dec 6 11:13:02 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.8:713 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida8 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:02 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.6:819 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida6 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:02 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.4:964 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida4 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:02 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.18:698 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida18 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:02 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.7:668 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida7 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:02 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.5:855 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida5 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:02 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.17:726 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida17 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:03 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.10:676 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida10 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:03 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.16:881 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida16 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:03 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.12:813 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida12 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:03 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.11:855 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida11 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:03 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.14:761 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida14 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:03 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.9:814 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida9 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:03 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.13:803 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida13 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:03 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.15:803 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida15 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:06 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.19:821 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida19 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:07 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.22:747 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida22 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:07 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.1:920 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida1 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:07 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.23:810 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida23 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:07 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.20:780 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida20 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:07 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.24:805 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida24 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:13:07 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.21:694 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida21 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:14:57 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.14:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:14:57 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.10:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:14:57 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.8:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:14:57 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.4:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:14:57 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.7:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:14:58 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.13:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:14:58 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.12:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:14:58 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.16:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:14:58 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.15:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:14:59 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.9:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:00 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.1:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:00 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.20:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:00 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.23:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:00 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.6:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:00 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.18:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:00 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.24:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:00 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.22:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:00 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.11:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:00 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.19:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:01 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.5:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:01 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.21:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:03 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.17:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:15:58 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.2:1018 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida2 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:16:51 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.1.2:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:17:06 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.3:785 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida3 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:17:47 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.3:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas)
Dec 6 11:18:55 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.15:893 for
/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/nnaida15 (/data10/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs)
Dec 6 11:19:35 aidas1 rpc.mountd[2926]: authenticated mount request from 10.1.2.15:864 for /MIDAS@aidas
(/MIDAS@aidas) |
|
527
|
Tue Dec 6 02:20:29 2016 |
TD | Tuesday 6 December | 11.20 DSSSD bias & leakage currents OK - see attachments 1 & 2
FEE64 temperatures OK - see attachment 3
Ambient temperature +24.8 deg C, d.p. +3.6 deg C, RH 25.4%
14.40 Latest version of leakage curent spreadsheet - see attachment 4
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12hgbrywB10hGsKt5uc2HnLfZymh8_uvM6cEASbbqnBE/edit#gid=1357176413
18.30 DSSSD bias OFF
FEE64 power OFF
AIDA withdrawn from BRIKEN (CH2)n moderator
BNC PB-4 pulser OFF
NIM bins OFF
Julabo FL11006 chiller OFF
3 phase ac power OFF
ac power OFF and disconnected
USB-controlled ac mains relay removed for mod/update |
Attachment 1: 100.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 101.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 102.png
|
|
Attachment 4: AIDA_leakage_current(13).xlsx
|
|
525
|
Mon Dec 5 11:53:26 2016 |
TD | MACB test |
MACB configuration can be found at https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/AIDA/357
To investigate system-wide check clock status errors for nnaida5, 7, 8, 15 & 16
PJCS requests changing MACB #3 (5, 6, 13 & 14) mode from 3 to 0 (all other MACB
modes unchanged) followed by power-cycle of FEE64s
System-wide checks - see attachments 1-11
No clock status errors observed for nnaida5
N.B. nnaida23 fails clock status
Switch MACB #3 (7, 8, 15 & 16) from mode 0 to 3, and MACB #4 from 3 to 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
System-wide checks - see attachments 12-21
ReSync not complete for nnaida21, 22
Clock status errors observed for 5, 7, 8, 15, 16 *and* 21, 22
Switch MACB #4 (21, 22, 29 & 30) from mode 0 to 3, and MACB #5 (7, 8, 15 & 16) from 3 to 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
System-wide checks - see attachments 22-28
ReSync not complete for nnaida7, 8, 15 & 16
Clock status errors observed for nnaida7, 8, 15 & 16 - status = 0
Switch MACB #5 (21, 22, 29 & 30) from mode 0 to 3
-------------------------------------------------
System-wide checks - see attachments 29-33
ReSync OK
Clock status errors observed for nnaida5, 7, 8, 15 & 16 - status = various, bit 2 always set (as before)
Replace MACB #5 (was rev A, MACB serial #9) with MACB serial #13 (rev A, firmware 16.4.15) mode 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
System-wide checks - see attachments 34-36
ReSync OK
Clock status errors observed for nnaida5, 7, 8, 15 & 16 - status = various, bit 2 always set (as before)
i.e. no change, MACB #5 NIM module not the problem
Replace MACB #1 (was rev B, MACB serial #21) with MACB serial #38 (rev B, firmware 16.4.15, internal CLK TERM
mod) mode 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
System-wide checks - see attachments 37-40
ReSync OK
*ALL* system-wide checks OK
Offline analysis of file Dec2016/R1_5 demonstrates ADC & disc data synchronised - see attachments 41 & 42 |
Attachment 1: 10.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 11.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 12.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 13.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 14.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 15.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 16.png
|
|
Attachment 8: 17.png
|
|
Attachment 9: 18.png
|
|
Attachment 10: 19.png
|
|
Attachment 11: 20.png
|
|
Attachment 12: 30.png
|
|
Attachment 13: 31.png
|
|
Attachment 14: 32.png
|
|
Attachment 15: 33.png
|
|
Attachment 16: 34.png
|
|
Attachment 17: 35.png
|
|
Attachment 18: 36.png
|
|
Attachment 19: 37.png
|
|
Attachment 20: 38.png
|
|
Attachment 21: 39.png
|
|
Attachment 22: 110.png
|
|
Attachment 23: 111.png
|
|
Attachment 24: 112.png
|
|
Attachment 25: 113.png
|
|
Attachment 26: 114.png
|
|
Attachment 27: 115.png
|
|
Attachment 28: 116.png
|
|
Attachment 29: 120.png
|
|
Attachment 30: 121.png
|
|
Attachment 31: 122.png
|
|
Attachment 32: 123.png
|
|
Attachment 33: 124.png
|
|
Attachment 34: 130.png
|
|
Attachment 35: 131.png
|
|
Attachment 36: 133.png
|
|
Attachment 37: 140.png
|
|
Attachment 38: 141.png
|
|
Attachment 39: 142.png
|
|
Attachment 40: 143.png
|
|
Attachment 41: 150.png
|
|
Attachment 42: 151.png
|
|
|
524
|
Mon Dec 5 10:51:08 2016 |
TD | Monday 5 December | 19.50 DSSSD bias & leakage currents OK - see attachments 1 & 2
FEE64 temperatures HIGH - see attachment 3
FL11006 E01 low fluid level (actual halfway between minimum and middle visual markers)
water topped up to just below maximum visual marker and FL11006 restarted - see attachment 4
Ambient temperature +25.6 deg C, d.p. +7.2 deg C, RH 31.1%
20.25 Leakage current spreadsheet appended - see attachment 5
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12hgbrywB10hGsKt5uc2HnLfZymh8_uvM6cEASbbqnBE/edit#gid=1357176413 |
Attachment 1: 1.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 3.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 4.png
|
|
Attachment 5: AIDA_leakage_current(12).xlsx
|
|
523
|
Sun Dec 4 05:46:42 2016 |
TD | SyncCheck RIBF03R1 & RIBF123R1 commissioning tests archived |
The SyncCheck etc software used for the RIBF123R1 and RIBF03R1 commissioning
tests on d05 (user aida) has been archived as
aidas1:/homes/npg/SyncCheck/SyncCheck-d05-041216.tar.gz
aidas1:/homes/npg/SyncCheck/DataPackage-d05-041216.tar.gz
aidas1:/homes/npg/SyncCheck/ribfts-d05-041216.tar.gz |
|
522
|
Sun Dec 4 04:05:24 2016 |
TD | Report - low - DAQ SETUP sometimes produces Javascript error |
DAQ SETUP sometimes produces Javascript error instead of a pop-up displaying
the status of the ReSync - see attachment 1
Re-run ReSync by selecting 'Perform ReSync' from 'Master Timestamp Control' |
Attachment 1: 10.png
|
|
|
521
|
Sun Dec 4 03:44:12 2016 |
TD | Sunday 4 December | 12.45 DSSSD bias & leakage currents OK - see attachments 1 & 2
FEE64 temperatures OK - see attachment 3
Ambient temperature +25.1 deg C, d.p. -3.0 deg C, RH 15.6%
14.05 per FEE64 Rate, Hitrate, 1*L and 1*W spectra, good events stats - see attachments 4-10
Note - good events stats indicate increased extrinsic noise (c. 100kHz period) during these screenshots
14.15 1*W and 4*W spectra for nnida24, 17 & 20 - see attachments 11-16
Note - nnida24 ASIC#1 probably has cable/connector fault at DSSSD end |
Attachment 1: 1.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 3.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 11.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 12.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 13.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 14.png
|
|
Attachment 8: 17.png
|
|
Attachment 9: 18.png
|
|
Attachment 10: 19.png
|
|
Attachment 11: 20.png
|
|
Attachment 12: 21.png
|
|
Attachment 13: 22.png
|
|
Attachment 14: 23.png
|
|
Attachment 15: 24.png
|
|
Attachment 16: 25.png
|
|
|
520
|
Sat Dec 3 10:49:36 2016 |
TD | Saturday 3 December | 19.48 DSSSD bias & leakage currents OK - see attachments 1 & 2
FEE64 temperatures OK - see attachment 3
Ambient temperature +25.1 deg C, d.p. -3.0 deg C, RH 15.6% |
Attachment 1: 1.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 3.png
|
|
|
519
|
Fri Dec 2 09:58:54 2016 |
DK | Simple PID with LISE++ | I wrote this LISE++ file based on the Takechi .lpp modified by AE for 77Ni, 78Ni, 76Ni.
Basically, I changed the primary beam to 48Ca, reduced the production target thickness to 1 mm (I think it may
be correct), inserted the carbon target at F8, and made the RIB as 41Al and had it calculate the optics. Then I
modified by hand D7 and D8 Brho settings to like 6.32 Tm which is something near the correct value (for plastic,
but I forget for carbon, slightly different perhaps?)
Then I make a fairly arbitrary dE-ToF plot (attachment 1) without any concern for what data it thinks is filling
the plot, and run the Monte Carlo simulation.
This may give a user some kind of naive picture of what sorts of ions we might expect, with a basic clue about
their relative intensity or improbability to detect.
I did this work in literally about 5 minutes total, so do not take it too seriously. It is definitely not
right, but it is not totally nonsense either. You can play with the .lpp file (attachment 2) if you want to
improve it. You should definitely get the degraders used within BigRIPS correctly. I imagine they are much thicker, because D6 being 8.42 Tm is much too high (it was more like
7.5 Tm or so?) The other things you can (and should) add is things at F11 like our degraders, AIDA, and so on. I heard Gabor might do this at some point, but he may have become
very busy with other tasks.
Attachment 3 shows some relative intensities numerically. Again, you should not really trust this.
However, let's take some known experimental values.
I recall that at the BigRIPS F11 Pla. scaler, when we did the 41Al unreacted measurement, it was about 30 cps = 108000 counts per hour
I think we had about several counts per hour of 40Mg in the best case reaching to F11.
It means that 41Al and 40Mg ratio is around order 10^5 difference.
Surprisingly, this is nearly the same as the results of this quick LISE++ simulation (attachment 3 has numbers) |
Attachment 1: lise-41Al.png
|
|
Attachment 2: SettingFallonDK.lpp
|
Version 9.9.4
{============================= Main Part ======================================}
[general]
File = Z:\home\daid\downloads\SettingFallonDK.lpp
Date = 02-12-2016
Time = 18:59:20
Configuration = C:\Users\inabe\Desktop\laa.lcn
Optionsfile = A1900_2006.lopt
Title = BigRIPS Standard + ZDS Large Acceptance Achromatic mode
BlockStructure = DSSAWMSMDSMMMMMSMMMMMMMMMDMDMMAWSMMMMMMDMDMMMMMSMMMMSMMMMAMMDSMMMSSMMMDMSMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMSM
[settings]
A,Z,Q = 48Ca20+ ; Mass ElementName Charge+ Beam
Energy = 345 MeV/u
Intensity = 500 pnA ; enA,pna,pps,kW
RF frequency = 20 MHz
Bunch length = 1 ns
Settings on A,Z = 41Al ; Mass ElementName Charge+ Beam
[OpticsBeam]
BX = 0.5 (±)mm ; one-half the horisontal beam extent (x)
BT = 5 (±)mrad ; one-half the horisontal beam divergence(x')
BY = 0.5 (±)mm ; one-half the vertical beam extent (y)
BF = 5 (±)mrad ; one-half the vertical beam divergence (y')
BL = 30 (±)mm
BD = 0.1 (±)% ; one-half of the momentum spread (dp/p)
ShiftX = 0 mm ; beam respect to the spectrometer axis
AngleX = 0 mrad ; beam respect to the spectrometer axis
ShiftY = 0 mm ; beam respect to the spectrometer axis
AngleY = 0 mrad ; beam respect to the spectrometer axis
Scheme Angle = 60 degrees
ShapeX = 1
ShapeT = 1
ShapeY = 1
ShapeF = 1
ShapeL = 1
ShapeD = 1
[SlitsBeforeTarget]
Shape = 1 ; 0-slits, 1-ellipse
ApertureShape = 1 ; 0-slits, 1-ellipse
X_action = 0,0,0 ; Use 1/0, Show 1/0, UseApp 1/0
X_size = 1,-2.00,-50.0,2.00,50.0 ; joint,Left,L-limit,Right,R-limit
Y_action = 0,0,0 ; Use 1/0, Show 1/0, UseApp 1/0
Y_size = 1,-2.00,-50.0,2.00,50.0 ; joint,Bottom,B-limit,Top,T-limit
[options]
NP simple = 32 ; Number of points in distribution
NP charge states = 32 ; Number of points in distribution
NP wedge = 32 ; Number of points in distribution
Charge states = No ; No & Yes
CutEdgeEffect = 1 ; 1-Yes. Default, 0-no - for extended configurations
Prim.beam scatter = 0 ; 0-without, 1-with
Delta peak = 0 ; 0-without, 1-with
BrhoMeanMax = 0 ; 0-Max, 1-Mean
BrhoMeMaLeRi = 3 ; 0-Max, 1-Mean, 2-Left, 3-Right /for fission/
[target]
Target contents = 0,4,1,9.012 ; Nomer,Z,Atoms,Mass
Target thickness = 4,1,1.848,0,0 ; State,Thickness,density,angle,SolidGas
Target fusion compound = 0
Targ use for Q-states = 1
Target Defect = 1,0 ; [0] choice - % or micron at 0 degree, [1]=value;
Degrader contents = 0,6,1,12.011 ; Nomer,Z,Atoms,Mass
Degrader thickness = 0,0,2.26,0,0 ; State,Thickness,density,angle,SolidGas
Degra use for Q-states = 1
Degrader Defect = 1,0 ; [0] choice - % or micron at 0 degree, [1]=value;
[mechanism]
Reaction = 0 ; 0 - fragm, 1 - fusion-resid, 2 - fusion-fission
CalcOther = 113 ; calculate other reactions
V calculation = 3 ; 0 - constant, 1 - Borrel, 2 - Rami, 3-convolution, 4-two body reaction
V_opt/Vbeam = 1 ; default 1
Velocity_exceed = 1 ; 0 - without, 1-with - two-body recations velocity corrections
Binding Energy for Vf/Vp = 8 MeV ; Binding energy for Borrel's expression
Shift for Vf/Vp calc = 0
Prefragment_Rami = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
Sigma0 = 90 MeV/c ; default 90
SigmaD = 200 MeV/c ; default 200
SigmaM = 87 MeV/c ; default 87
Asymmetry = 0 % ; default 0
Method v-sigma = 3 ; 0 - Goldhaber, 1-Morrissey,2-Friedman,3-Convolution
G_Surface = 0.95 MeV/fm^2
Symmetry around half_Ab = 1 ; 1 - yes, 0-no
Pfaff pickup correction = 1 ; 1 - yes, 0-no
ChargeExchangePfaff = 1 ; 1 - exclude, 0-forget
Sigma corr 0 = 0 ; Coulomb energy
Sigma corr 1 = 0 ; Projectile mass
Friedman mode = 2 ; 0-Qgg, 1-Surface, 2-Qgg+Surface
Prefragment_Fri = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
Coulomb_Friedman = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
K_Morr = 8 MeV/A ; E/A=8MeV/A default; D.Morrissey coef.
K_MorHalf = 8 MeV/A ; E/A=8MeV/A default at Afrag=Aproj/2; D.Morrissey coef.
BarrierShape = 1 ; 0- classical, 1-quantum mech.
H_omega = 5 MeV ; default 3
Probabilty_CN = 1 ; 0/1 use Prbabilty for CN formation
AA_fast = 0 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
Width Coef = 1 ; default 1; for Leon's charge state distribution
gZt Correction = 1 ; default 1; Leon's C.S.D.
PowerCoefLeon = 0.477 ; default 0.477; Leon's C.S.D.
Cross section = File ; Fit & File
Charge method = 3 ; charge calculations method 0-5
EPAX Cross Section = 4 ; cross section calculations method 0-4
SR Cross Section = 2 ; EPAX for SR 0-2
Energy Loss = 2 ; energy loss calculation method 0-3
Anglular straggling = 1 ; 0-LISE, 1-ATIMA
StragglingCoef1 = 0.217
StragglingCoef2 = 1.12
Energy straggling = 1 ; 0-LISE, 1-ATIMA
EnergyStragMethod = 0 ; 0-integrate, 1-table
EnergyStragShape = 0 ; 0-Gauss, 1-Landau-Vavilov
EquilThickness = 1 ; 0-Charge, 1-Global
MassMethod = 0 ; 0-DB+calcul, 1 + just calcul
MassDataBase = 0 ; 0-A&W, 1-User ME
Mass formula = 2 ; 0-LDM, 1-Myerer, 2: 1+corrections
UseChargeForEnergy = 2 ; 0-No, 1-Yes, 2-Auto
EnergyValueAuto = 30 ; default value 30 MeV/u
EquilibriumMode = 0 ; 0-Equil, 1-NonEquil
UB_Global = 70 ; default 70 MeV/u
MinZ_Global = 2 ; default Z>=29
ChargeStateOptim = 1 ; 0-No, 1-Yes
ZmQ_AfterReactn = 0 ; default 0 (full stripped)
EPAX_p_Norm = 1
EPAX_p_Un = 1.65
EPAX_p_Up0 = 1.79
EPAX_p_Up1 = 0.00472
EPAX_p_Up2 = -1.3e-5
EPAX_p_H = 1
[fission]
FisAngDistShape = 0 ; 0-isotropic; 1-anisotropic
FisMomCutForAngDist = 2 ; 0-dont use; 1-use just MatrixKinematics; 2-use for all; (default 2)
OddEvenCorrections = 1 ; 0-dont use; 1-use
PostScissionEvaporation = 1 ; 0-dont use; 1-use
DeexcitFunctionPoints = 0 ; 0- average deexcitation energy; 1- 3 points; 2 - manually
FisEXmanually = 20 ; Excitation energy manually
FisCSmanually = 1000 ; Cross section manually
FisTXEmethod = 1 ; 0-from Edissipated, 1 from Q-value
Fis_f = 0.0045 ; default 0.0045
FisEXsigma = 5.5 MeV ; default 5.5
FisCS_Global = 1e-15
FisCS_TKE = 1e-8
N0 = 83 ; default 82
dU0 = -2.65 ; default -2.5
C0 = 0.7 ; default 1.4
cpol0 = 0.65 ; default 0.65
width0 = 0.63 ; default 0.63
N1 = 90 ; default 90
dU1 = -3.8 ; default -5.5
C1 = 0.15 ; default 0.16
cpol1 = 0.55 ; default 0.55
width1 = 0.97 ; default 0.97
[charge_suppression]
FragInd = 1e-3
FragTotal = 1e-5
BeamInd = 1e-9
BeamTotal = 1e-11
[convolution]
Convolution mode = 2 ; 0-Qgg, 1-Surface, 2-Qgg+Surface
SigmaConv = 91.5 MeV/c ; default 90 for Convolution
CoefConv_0 = 3.344
CoefConv_1 = 5.758
CoefConv_2 = 2.936
ShiftConv_0 = 0.158
ShiftConv_1 = 0.149
ShiftConv_2 = 0.153
[evaporation]
NP evaporation = 16 ; Number of points in distribution
EvapMethod = 2
StateDensityMode = 2 ; 0, 1+pairing, 2+shell
EvapUnstableNuclei = 1 ; 0 - only stable,1 +unstable
Tunnelling = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
AvoidUnboundCS = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
ProtectedChannels = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
R_Evaporation = 5.7 fm ; correction for the effective Coulomb barrier
Mode_Apf_manual = 0 ; 1-manual, 0-auto
Energy_in_T = 2 ; default 2
EvaporationVelocity = 0 ; 0 - quality, 1 -fast
DeltaOddEvenEvap = 12
DeltaOddEvenFission = 14
BreakupTemperature250 = 4.7
BreakupTemperature150 = 5.9
BreakupTemperature050 = 8
BreakupDiffuseness = 0.05
DissipationKramers = 0 ; 0 - no, 1 - use
DissipationStepFunction = 1 ; 0 - no, 1 - use
DissipationBeta = 1 ; default 2.0
mode_1n = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_2n = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_1p = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_2p = 0 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_a = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_d = 0 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_t = 0 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_3he = 0 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_fis = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_brk_up = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
mode_gamma = 0 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
[fission_barrier]
FissionBarrierFactor = 1
FissionBarrierMode = 1 ; #0-4
OddEvenCorrections = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
ShellCorrections = 1 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
FB_InOutMax = 2 ; #0-2 - in/out/max
ModeForUser = 1 ; #0-2
NdeltaOddEven = 2.5
ZdeltaOddEven = 9
[excitation_energy]
GeomAA_Correction = 0 ; 0 - don't use,1 - use -default
Thermalization = 0 ; 1-Yes, 0-No
ThermaTimeCoef = 3e-22 ; 2.1e-22 MeV *s/e(t)
Friction = 0 ; 0 - off,1 - on
Ev_A_SigmaCoef = 9.6
G_FrictionCoef1 = 6.5
G_FrictionCoef2 = 0
G_FactorCoef1 = 1.5
G_FactorCoef2 = 2.5
DepthHole = 40
EnergyCoef_CB0 = 0
EnergyCoef_CB1 = 13.3
EnergyCoef_CB2 = 0
SigmaCoef_CB0 = 0
SigmaCoef_CB1 = 9.6
SigmaCoef_CB2 = 0
D_MeanTemp = 13
[evapauto]
tun_a0 = 1.00938
tun_a1 = -0.36149
tun_a2 = 0.21551
A_Bound = 300 ; mass
A_Pairing = 12 ; mass
[plot]
Start target = Detector ; Detector & RF
Start of TOF = T1
Stop of TOF = M8
dE-detector-1st = M24
dE-detector-2nd = M28
TKE-detector = M8
PlotBrho = S3
PlotWedge = S4
X-detector = M8
Y-detector = M9
Tilting = M1
Stopper = M2
RO_Wedge = n
ConditionBlock = A0
Plot threshold = 1e-10 pps ; minimal value for plot scale
Shift of TOF for RF = 0 ns ; for dE-TOF plot with RF
Fraction of RF trigger = 1
UseCondition = 1
TKE_calibration = 1,1,0,MeV ; Input PV(0) or CH(1), A, B, dimension
[cs_file]
UserDiffCS = 0 ; Number of User Diff CS saved in this file
AppendOverwrite = 1
AttachedInside = 1
ShowCSinPlot = 1
Chi2 = 1
CSfilename = C:\Users\inabe\Desktop\238U_Be_300AMeV_fission20072008.cs
[sec_reactions]
NP sec.reactions = 16 ; Number of points in distribution
Secondary reactions = 0 ; 0/1 - use secondary reactions in calculations
fiss_FilterUse0 = 0
fiss_FilterUse1 = 0
fiss_FilterUse2 = 0
fiss_ellipse = 5
fiss_NdeltaTop = 0
fiss_ZdeltaTop = 0
fiss_NdeltaBot = 25
fiss_ZdeltaBot = 20
frag_FilterUse0 = 3
frag_FilterUse1 = 3
frag_FilterUse2 = 3
frag_ellipse = 4
frag_NdeltaTop = 5
frag_ZdeltaTop = 5
frag_NdeltaBot = 6
frag_ZdeltaBot = 6
[abrasion_fission]
HML_show = 7 ; HML-bits
BoundaryLow = 40 MeV
BoundaryHigh = 180 MeV
Velocity = 1 ; Calculat fissile nuclei speed
LowEx_nucleus = 47Ca ; Mass ElementName Charge+ Beam
L_CS_Ex = 3.000e+02 25.00 5.00 ; mb, MeV, Mev
MidEx_nucleus = 42Ar ; Mass ElementName Charge+ Beam
M_CS_Ex = 1.000e+03 100.00 5.00 ; mb, MeV, Mev
HighEx_nucleus = 36S ; Mass ElementName Charge+ Beam
H_CS_Ex = 8.000e+02 250.00 5.00 ; mb, MeV, Mev
... 4931 more lines ...
|
Attachment 3: PIDintensity.png
|
|
|
518
|
Fri Dec 2 09:47:58 2016 |
DK | F8 targets | F8 target measurements, for posterity.
Plastic: ~39 to 40 mm
Carbon: 20. mm |
|
517
|
Fri Dec 2 09:47:45 2016 |
DK | F8 targets | F8 targets, for posterity.
Plastic: 39~40 mm
Carbon: 20. mm |
|
516
|
Fri Dec 2 08:23:28 2016 |
TD | Offline analysis of R48_9 | Analysis of background, pulser off
S O R T C O M P L E T E ..... Fri Dec 2 17:11:14 2016
*** ENTRY finish
*** data items: 261088000 ( 94096.36 Hz)
*** ADC events: 27335403 ( 9851.71 Hz)
*** time warps: 0 ( 0.00 Hz)
*** DSSSD # 1 count: 5742802 old count: 5732397 dt: 247.48 s LEC rate: 23205.52 Hz
*** DSSSD # 2 count: 5336197 old count: 5326542 dt: 247.48 s LEC rate: 21562.51 Hz
*** DSSSD # 3 count: 2888673 old count: 2883342 dt: 247.48 s LEC rate: 11672.55 Hz
*** DSSSD # 4 count: 2581418 old count: 2576776 dt: 247.48 s LEC rate: 10431.00 Hz
*** DSSSD # 5 count: 2086882 old count: 2083032 dt: 247.48 s LEC rate: 8432.68 Hz
*** DSSSD # 6 count: 3432165 old count: 3425579 dt: 247.48 s LEC rate: 13868.70 Hz
*** DSSSD # 1 count: 0 old count: 0 dt: 247.48 s HEC rate: 0.00 Hz
*** DSSSD # 2 count: 0 old count: 0 dt: 247.48 s HEC rate: 0.00 Hz
*** DSSSD # 3 count: 0 old count: 0 dt: 247.48 s HEC rate: 0.00 Hz
*** DSSSD # 4 count: 0 old count: 0 dt: 247.48 s HEC rate: 0.00 Hz
*** DSSSD # 5 count: 0 old count: 0 dt: 247.48 s HEC rate: 0.00 Hz
*** DSSSD # 6 count: 0 old count: 0 dt: 247.48 s HEC rate: 0.00 Hz
*** ENTRY finish ends
S O R T S T O P P E D ..... Fri Dec 2 17:12:28 2016 |
Attachment 1: 100.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 101.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 102.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 103.png
|
|
|
515
|
Fri Dec 2 06:41:25 2016 |
DK | Benchmarks for compression | R45_17 as the test file, which was closed at 9.02 AM Friday, December 2nd at the end of the official parasitic
machine time on Fallon et al.
===Summarized results===
Initial file is 2.0 GB of AIDA data
LZMA: 862M; Time: 23 min
BZ2: 1.3G; Time: 6.5 min
GZ: 1.3G; Time: 3 min
The LZMA results are about as I expected: fantastic compression but it takes a very long time to pack the data.
The BZ2 data are a bit surprising; usually it can be about 10 or 15% smaller than GZ for hexdata from my
experience. I conclude that we should use GZ (which we are already doing, but now we confirm that it is
optimized for time versus disk space usage).
15.49 We are continuing to compress the data. Presently we are somewhere around R39_20, sequentially. I
estimated that there are 578 runs remaining, and naively say each is 2 GB (some at the end of RXX_ may be less).
Compression at 3 minutes each then takes 29 hours, so it should be finished by tomorrow evening, say around
20:00 or a little later, depending on the fluctuation.
===Full details of the test===
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks % ls -altr
total 2048024
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 2097152000 Dec 2 13:58 R45_17
drwxrwxr-x. 55 npg users 4096 Dec 2 14:01 ..
drwxr-xr-x. 2 npg npgstaff 4096 Dec 2 14:01 .
First test with lzma
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks % time tar cvf R45_17.lzma --lzma R45_17
R45_17
tar cvf R45_17.lzma --lzma R45_17 1388.10s user 15.63s system 100% cpu 23:13.94 total
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks % ls -altrh
total 2.8G
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 2.0G Dec 2 13:58 R45_17
drwxrwxr-x. 55 npg users 4.0K Dec 2 14:08 ..
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 862M Dec 2 14:31 R45_17.lzma
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks %
as expected, the compression quality is very good (> 50%) but this is much to slow to be practical.
next we can attempt bz2
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks % time tar cvjf R45_17.tar.bz2 R45_17
R45_17
tar cvjf R45_17.tar.bz2 R45_17 375.22s user 6.68s system 97% cpu 6:31.74 total
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks % ls -altrh
total 4.1G
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 2.0G Dec 2 13:58 R45_17
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 862M Dec 2 14:31 R45_17.lzma
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 737 Dec 2 14:31 results.txt
drwxrwxr-x. 55 npg users 4.0K Dec 2 14:32 ..
-rw-------. 1 npg npgstaff 12K Dec 2 14:33 .results.txt.swp
drwxr-xr-x. 2 npg npgstaff 4.0K Dec 2 14:34 .
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 1.3G Dec 2 14:40 R45_17.tar.bz2
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks % ls -altrh
total 4.1G
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 2.0G Dec 2 13:58 R45_17
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 862M Dec 2 14:31 R45_17.lzma
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 737 Dec 2 14:31 results.txt
drwxrwxr-x. 55 npg users 4.0K Dec 2 14:32 ..
-rw-------. 1 npg npgstaff 12K Dec 2 14:33 .results.txt.swp
drwxr-xr-x. 2 npg npgstaff 4.0K Dec 2 14:34 .
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 1.3G Dec 2 14:40 R45_17.tar.bz2
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks % time tar cvzf R45_17.tar.gz R45_17
R45_17
tar cvzf R45_17.tar.gz R45_17 188.01s user 6.53s system 100% cpu 3:13.98 total
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks % time tar cvzf R45_17.tar.gz R45_17
R45_17
tar cvzf R45_17.tar.gz R45_17 188.01s user 6.53s system 100% cpu 3:13.98 total
npg@aidas1 ~/benchmarks % ls -altrh
total 5.4G
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 2.0G Dec 2 13:58 R45_17
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 862M Dec 2 14:31 R45_17.lzma
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 737 Dec 2 14:31 results.txt
drwxrwxr-x. 55 npg users 4.0K Dec 2 14:32 ..
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 1.3G Dec 2 14:40 R45_17.tar.bz2
drwxr-xr-x. 2 npg npgstaff 4.0K Dec 2 14:44 .
-rw-r--r--. 1 npg npgstaff 1.3G Dec 2 14:47 R45_17.tar.gz
-rw-------. 1 npg npgstaff 12K Dec 2 14:50 .results.txt.swp
conclusion is gzip is the best as for time efficiency. |
|
514
|
Thu Dec 1 16:01:10 2016 |
CG, PV | Friday 2 December | 00.07 BigRIPS data file 1135
01.07 BigRIPS data file 1136.
02.09 BigRIPS data file 1137.
02.13 Beam off. ~1/2 way through R44_137
02.16 Beam back. ~600MB into R44_139
BigRIPS data file 1138.
03.17 BigRIPS data file 1139.
03.37 Beam stopped. End of R44_167.
03.43 Beam returned to F11. ~700MB through R44_170.
BigRIPS data file 1140.
04.00 Beam off for stripper foil change. End of R44_175.
04.06 Beam returned to F11. 1.2GB into R44_178.
04.08 BigRIPS data file 1141.
05.09 BigRIPS data file 1142.
06.02 BigRIPS data fill 1143.
06.26 R44 stopped @ R44_227 ahead of LN2 fill.
07.02 BigRIPS data file 1144.
07.43 Run R45 started.
08.02 BigRIPS data file 1145.
08.05 Local Elog and BigRIPS log uploaded (attachments 3-6).
09.00 Machine time ended, the last data file is R45_18
13.40 Biases are shown as attachments 7 and 8
15.04 DAQ starts (RIBF03R1/R46)
Pulser walkthrough
Amplitude 90,000 - 10,000 @ 10,000 step
x5 attenuator IN
t_r 50ns tau_d 50us
frequency 250Hz range
polarity -, tail pulse, delay MIN
15.19 Walk through finishes. See attachments 9 and 10 for histograms
15.26 DAQ starts (RIBF03R1/R47)
Pulser walkthrough
Amplitude 12,000 - 2,000 @ 2,000 step
15.35 R47_2 finishes.
See attachments 11 and 12 for histograms
15.41 DAQ starts (RIBF03R1/R48)
Background - BNC PB-4 pulser OFF
16.35 DAQ stops OK (RIBF03R1/R48_13)
16.55 DSSSD bias & leakage currents Ok - see attachment 13 & 14
Ambient temperature +25.2 deg C, -4.2 deg C, RH 14.2% |
Attachment 1: bias1.png
|
|
Attachment 2: bias2.png
|
|
Attachment 3: BigRIPSlog.pdf
|
|
Attachment 4: RIBFlog1.pdf
|
|
Attachment 5: RIBFlog2.pdf
|
|
Attachment 6: RIBFlog3.pdf
|
|
Attachment 7: end-exp-bias2.png
|
|
Attachment 8: end-exp-bias1.png
|
|
Attachment 9: r46_walkthrough_4.png
|
|
Attachment 10: r46_walkthrough_3.png
|
|
Attachment 11: r47_walkthrough_3.png
|
|
Attachment 12: r47_walkthrough_4.png
|
|
Attachment 13: 40.png
|
|
Attachment 14: 41.png
|
|
|
513
|
Thu Dec 1 10:58:54 2016 |
PV, TD, Liu | Implantation profile in AIDA , after switch back to the previous ZDS setting (AIDA 43_63 to 43_71, bigrips run 1129) | |
Attachment 1: 51.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 45.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 31.png
|
|
|
512
|
Thu Dec 1 09:46:06 2016 |
TD | Offline analysis of R43_59 | Variable degrader setting is now #2 + #3: 0.3 mm W + 1.0 mm W [+2 mm Al]
Centre ZDS @ 40Mg
ADC & disc data synchronised
S O R T C O M P L E T E ..... Thu Dec 1 18:15:11 2016
*** ENTRY finish
*** data items: 261088000 ( 105051.06 Hz)
*** ADC events: 36442207 ( 14662.84 Hz)
*** time warps: 0 ( 0.00 Hz)
*** DSSSD # 1 count: 5340742 old count: 5338849 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 17511.91 Hz
*** DSSSD # 2 count: 4962731 old count: 4960982 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 16272.43 Hz
*** DSSSD # 3 count: 2885062 old count: 2884042 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 9459.91 Hz
*** DSSSD # 4 count: 2336560 old count: 2335778 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 7661.41 Hz
*** DSSSD # 5 count: 2003149 old count: 2002489 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 6568.18 Hz
*** DSSSD # 6 count: 3645726 old count: 3644468 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 11954.07 Hz
*** DSSSD # 1 count: 56 old count: 56 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.18 Hz
*** DSSSD # 2 count: 62 old count: 62 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.20 Hz
*** DSSSD # 3 count: 87 old count: 87 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.29 Hz
*** DSSSD # 4 count: 60 old count: 60 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.20 Hz
*** DSSSD # 5 count: 37 old count: 37 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.12 Hz
*** DSSSD # 6 count: 9 old count: 9 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.03 Hz
*** ENTRY finish ends
S O R T S T O P P E D ..... Thu Dec 1 18:16:30 2016 |
Attachment 1: 10.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 11.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 12.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 13.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 14.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 15.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 16.png
|
|
Attachment 8: 17.png
|
|
Attachment 9: 18.png
|
|
|
511
|
Thu Dec 1 08:13:06 2016 |
PV,Liu, TD | Implantation profile in AIDA , after changing the ZDS setting to center at 41Al, AIDA 43_ 33 to 43 | Bigrips run 1127
AIDA run 43_ 33 to 43 |
Attachment 1: 36.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 24.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 50.png
|
|
|
510
|
Thu Dec 1 02:25:41 2016 |
DK | Offline analysis of R42_32 | Offline analysis of AIDA R42_32.
Degrader condition of F11 is with the same stopping power of e.g. R42_7 (see https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/AIDA/509).
5 mm Al between MUSIC 1 and MUSIC 2
3. + 0.2 = 3.2 mm Al on the upstream side of the PE wall
Pb wall between MUSIC 1 and MUSIC 2 was reduced from 7.5 cm gap to ~6.5 mm gap (beam right side pushed in 1
cm, so asymmetric)
(Variable degrader system remains unchanged with 1,2,3 in: 0.5 mm W + 0.3 mm W + 1.0 mm W (+3 mm Al backings))
*** data items: 261088000 ( 118111.81 Hz)
*** ADC events: 36442207 ( 16485.84 Hz)
*** time warps: 0 ( 0.00 Hz)
*** DSSSD # 1 count: 5340742 old count: 5338849 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 17511.91 Hz
*** DSSSD # 2 count: 4962731 old count: 4960982 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 16272.43 Hz
*** DSSSD # 3 count: 2885062 old count: 2884042 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 9459.91 Hz
*** DSSSD # 4 count: 2336560 old count: 2335778 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 7661.41 Hz
*** DSSSD # 5 count: 2003149 old count: 2002489 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 6568.18 Hz
*** DSSSD # 6 count: 3645726 old count: 3644468 dt: 304.98 s LEC rate: 11954.07 Hz
*** DSSSD # 1 count: 56 old count: 56 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.18 Hz
*** DSSSD # 2 count: 62 old count: 62 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.20 Hz
*** DSSSD # 3 count: 87 old count: 87 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.29 Hz
*** DSSSD # 4 count: 60 old count: 60 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.20 Hz
*** DSSSD # 5 count: 37 old count: 37 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.12 Hz
*** DSSSD # 6 count: 9 old count: 9 dt: 304.98 s HEC rate: 0.03 Hz
*** ENTRY finish ends
S O R T S T O P P E D ..... Thu Dec 1 11:06:21 2016
See attached histograms.
Figure 1: The time structure of low energy events seems more normalized with a flat-top and similar intensity as
like R41_2 (see i.e. https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/AIDA/507 ) rather than R42_32, though one wonders if this is a
real effect or if R42_7 was somehow unusual.
Figure 2: We can confirm that the number of real events corresponding to light ions seems reduced compared to
R42_7 Fig 4.
Figure 5: Distribution in XY of low gain [heavy ion / high energy] is still weighted to the right hand side as
usual, but seems slightly more homogeneous than previous cases such as R42_7. This is corroborated by the
scalers pasted above, where the implant rate to DSSD#3 is about 0.3 Hz rather than 0.4 Hz of R42_7; this is
probably a real decrease and not merely a statistical effect as R41_2 also shows around 0.4 Hz. I conclude that
heavy ion implant rate is reduced by about 1/3 from R42_7, most probably from the Pb bricks cutting some
fraction of the beam (though in theory it could be from shifting 5 mm of the Al degrader up stream by ~2 m and
the angular straggling of the heavy ions in the plate).
Specific comparison of the implant rates show we are dropping 0.1 cps on DSSD#2, 0.1 cps on DSSD#3, and maybe 0.05 Hz
(it's a sensible number or not different than zero?) in DSSD#4, which can give an idea of what ion species are being
cut out if we looked at the BigRIPS PID correlated with AIDA implantation. |
Attachment 1: r42_32-301.png
|
|
Attachment 2: r42_32-2000.png
|
|
Attachment 3: r42_32-2020.png
|
|
Attachment 4: r42_32-2120.png
|
|
Attachment 5: r42_32-307.png
|
|
Attachment 6: r42_32-2110.png
|
|
|
509
|
Thu Dec 1 00:21:08 2016 |
DK | Offline analysis of R42_7 | Checking that the implantation is still reasonable after LN2 fill recovery.
Degrader condition is 8. + 0.2 mm Al on the upstream side of the PE wall.
All three variable degraders are in (0.5 mm W; 0.3 mm W; 1.0 mm W, each on 1 mm Al backing).
Confirmed degrader settings at 10.11 (right before a change was made after this run...)
*** data items: 261088000 ( 125355.46 Hz)
*** ADC events: 32885891 ( 15789.41 Hz)
*** time warps: 0 ( 0.00 Hz)
*** DSSSD # 1 count: 5369750 old count: 5351200 dt: 283.23 s LEC rate: 18958.97 Hz
*** DSSSD # 2 count: 4958223 old count: 4941299 dt: 283.23 s LEC rate: 17505.99 Hz
*** DSSSD # 3 count: 2872405 old count: 2862650 dt: 283.23 s LEC rate: 10141.59 Hz
*** DSSSD # 4 count: 2367926 old count: 2359880 dt: 283.23 s LEC rate: 8360.43 Hz
*** DSSSD # 5 count: 2063809 old count: 2056797 dt: 283.23 s LEC rate: 7286.69 Hz
*** DSSSD # 6 count: 3582944 old count: 3570809 dt: 283.23 s LEC rate: 12650.29 Hz
*** DSSSD # 1 count: 61 old count: 61 dt: 283.23 s HEC rate: 0.22 Hz
*** DSSSD # 2 count: 82 old count: 82 dt: 283.23 s HEC rate: 0.29 Hz
*** DSSSD # 3 count: 111 old count: 111 dt: 283.23 s HEC rate: 0.39 Hz
*** DSSSD # 4 count: 71 old count: 71 dt: 283.23 s HEC rate: 0.25 Hz
*** DSSSD # 5 count: 42 old count: 42 dt: 283.23 s HEC rate: 0.15 Hz
*** DSSSD # 6 count: 9 old count: 9 dt: 283.23 s HEC rate: 0.03 Hz
*** ENTRY finish ends
S O R T S T O P P E D ..... Thu Dec 1 09:11:23 2016
See attached histograms
Figure 5 shows low energy front and back, and if I compare to R41_2 offline analysis (i.e. https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/AIDA/507 ) then we see more fluctuation (of light ions?) it seems. Run 41_2 seems to show mostly noise (anti correlation) and here we see real ions (positive correlation. This is confirmed in our figure 4, where the statistics of DSSD#3 seems about doubled. The event rate per unit time in 41_2 shows a relatively flat top behavior characteristic of noise domination, where as our present one shows more jitter that could be characterized by light ion production and transport variation.
|
Attachment 1: r42_2110.png
|
|
Attachment 2: r42_307.png
|
|
Attachment 3: r42_2120.png
|
|
Attachment 4: r42-301.png
|
|
Attachment 5: r42-2000.png
|
|
|