AIDA GELINA BRIKEN nToF CRIB ISOLDE CIRCE nTOFCapture DESPEC DTAS EDI_PSA 179Ta CARME StellarModelling DCF K40
  EDI_PSA, Page 1 of 2  ELOG logo
ID Date Author Subjectdown
  22   Mon Jun 5 15:48:47 2023 Lucia B,David RWork on DAQ for 23Na target test

We started the acquisition via CoMPASS with one CeBr (90)  and the HPGe. The germanium was already cooled at 80K with a power of 90W. The CeBr HV was already applied from NHQ 202M bias supply, channel A, HV = +650V.

We applied the HV to the germanium on 5/6/23, from Ortec 660 dual bias supply borrowed from gas target, channel B, HV = +4900V, Bias shutdown connected.

Attached a picture of the baseline in the evening, before leaving the lab.

-----------------------

The DAQ from solid target is connected to the new Intel NUC mini-PC, located below the VME crate. It is possible to connect remotely to such PC using the RDP protocol (IP address -> 172.17.5.149). To connect from lunaserver, lauch Remmina and select lap2-depalo. Here, the CoMPASS project is located in /home/Compass/projects/23Na_target_tests.

We have also created the folder on lunaserver in /home/luna/Shared/Data/23Na_target_tests, where we copied from /home/luna/Shared/Data/16O_prompt the scripts required for possible binary conversions.

We are using three channels for the acquisition:

  • Ch. 1: scintillator CeBr 90
  • Ch. 2 : GeBo + pulser
  • Ch. 3: Pulser

Pulser module BNC Model 9010 with following parameters:

  • Amplitude 50 mV
  • Frequency 24 Hz
  • Delay 1 us
  • Width 1 us
  • Rise Time 0.05 us
  • Fall Time 5 us
  • Polarity: positive
  • No attenuation

We left an overnight background run (run_1).

 

 

 

 

  23   Tue Jun 6 11:15:31 2023 Lucia B,David RWork on DAQ for 23Na target test

Attached a picture of the germanium baseline in the morning 6/6/23.

-----------------------

We change the pulser amplitude to have it in the spectrum at what seemed a good position (A=150 mV).

We put 133Ba, 60Co and 137Cs sources in the shielding and started run_2 at Mon 6 June 2023, 12:15.

The run was stopped at 16:01. (Note there will be two ROOT files in the folder: one (2_1 for DataR_run_xx.root) is the automatic backup at 15:01, when the 'tentative' calibration on CeBr90 was enabled).

GeBo FWHM at 1.33 MeV is quite bad: 6.4 keV.

-------------------------------

We searched again in 16O log for optimal DAQ parameters and found them. We thave hen used them to see any possible resolution improvement. Spectrum is saved as run_3.

CeBr90 FWHM at 1.33 MeV is 46.10 keV.

GeBo FWHM at 1.33 MeV is 5.37 keV------------>with same parameters, 16O elog reports 3.42058 keV (Feb2023): note that Ge baseline thickness now is approximately 5mV, while in 16O elog I have found 2mV as reference, or slightly more from picture attached to same entry 110 Nov22).

Note that lowering the threshold at the 'optimal' values, we are cutting Ge spectrum at roughly 300 keV (which should not be a problem for 23Na+p resonance scan).

-----------------------------

We have mounted the Tantalum backing from Edinburgh (last spare, cleaned on 20/03/23 at LNGS) on the target holder and closed the beam line. We have left run_4 overnight as background run.

------------

Ge cryocooler is at 80K and 92 W.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  5   Wed Jun 26 14:15:43 2019 CBWaves to histogram program
Wrote simple program to convert from waves to amplitude/energy histogram.
Program uses semi-gaussian filtering with RC=RC, simple pole zero correction and baseline restoration.

Compile with g++ WavesToHisto.cpp -o WavesToHisto.x
Usage: ./WavesToHisto.x Sorted_run_file > histogram.dat
  10   Tue Jul 9 13:31:20 2019 CBTests with positive pulses
According to Carl U. the DPP-PSA software is not meant to be used with negative pulses, and some of the
functions that are currently not working may be recovered fixing this issue.

Changed Pulse Polarity in V1730PSD control panel Positive -> Negative 
No changes. Note trigger is currently supplied by external CFD
QLong histograms are still not counting

Set DC offset to 64000. The negative part of the pulse is cut off. Wave histogram shows nothing below zero.
Inversion doe snot appear to be working.


Changed BNC-4 Pulser polarity Negative -> Positive and changed polarity of time signal going to CFD. CFD
triggers OK.
No changes. QLong histograms not counting.

Enabled self-triggering on Ch0 and removed CFD input. DAQ no longer triggers. Put CFD back in.

Changed DC offset of Ch0 to 64010 to remove DC offset. Pulse now looks as attach 1.
Disconnected CFD output -> DAQ does not trigger. Reconnected CFD.
QLong histograms still not counting.

Attempted to change options in V1730PSD control panel one by one to see difference
Enabled Charge Pedestal -> No difference. Disabled
Changed Charge Sensitivity 5 fC -> 5.12 pC. No difference. Back to 5 fC
Changed Discrimination Mode CFD -> LED & removed CFD input. No triggers. Reverted

Changed Baseline Mean 16 -> 1024. Wave changes as per attach 1. QLong histogram starts counting at low channel.
See attach 2.
Changed DC offset 64010 -> 60000. Peak in QLong histogram moves to ~1050 channels. See attach 2.
Changed DC offset back to 64010.
Changed Baseline Mean 1024 -> 64. No changes in either wave shape or QLong peak position.
Changed Baseline Mean 64 -> 256. No changes as above.
Changed Baseline Mean 256->16. Wave is back as per attach 1, QLong no longer counting.
  4   Tue Jun 25 11:51:00 2019 CBTest run 4
P9 3-alpha source
Hamamatsu Photodiode - bias = 15V
Cooknell preamplifier
Analogue triggering chain

2048 total samples
256 samples pre-trigger window

Start 11:50 am
Lost contact with VME modules at ~ 18:00 - no more data written to file

Attempted to stop DAQ - failed.
Had to power cycle VME crate to restore contact. 
  24   Thu Jun 8 10:36:26 2023 Lucia B, Carlo BStart of the measurements

We have started the pumping system and reached ~10^-6 mbar vacuum. We have then filled the cold trap reaching ~10^-7 mbar.

We have started the chiller and the measurement on the Ta backing on 7/6/23. We made a quick run on top of the 19F(p,gamma) resonance at e_p=340 keV, and an overnight run on top of the 11B(p,gamma) resonance at E_p=163 keV.

On 08/06/23 we focused the beam at E_p=309 keV (23Na(p,gamma) resonance) and left a run on the Ta overlunch.

More details in the attached Excel sheet.

  2   Mon Jun 10 06:09:59 2019 CB, OHSorting program
Sort program written by Oscar, adapted from the RIKEN AIDA sort.
EDIT 26 Jun 2019 by CB - C++11 dependencies removed for SL6 compatibility
EDIT 28 Jun 2019 by CB - added histogram program mode

1. Untar/unzip
2. Compile with  g++ dataReaderMain.cpp -o dataReader
3. Usage       ./dataReader MODE pathToFile/File

where MODE is wave to output the waveforms, and histo to output a basic wave amplitude histogram with
semi-gaussian filtering applied on the waves
The output will be printed on standard output. 
Use ./dataReader MODE path/ToFile/File > pathToOutput/Output.dat
to save to file.

In wave mode the first few lines are the header. Waveforms are printed bin-by-bin with a newline after every
bin. A blank
line is placed between waveforms.
  21   Wed Jun 23 08:23:07 2021 CBR14 analysis 2
Given very poor fit using line + power law + line, changes were made to the fitting algorithm.
- Starting paramters optimised for new typical wave shape
- Reverted to 3 lines, since signals are faster
- Subtracted wave minimum from all wave points to have a more realistic chi2 estimate
- Discarded all waves where 2nd half of signal > 1st half of signal. Should correspond to pick-up / noise

Fit: 3 lines
Free parameters: 2x boundary points between lines
Algorithm: Nelder-Mead, 20 iterations.

Attach 1: Wave amplitudes
Attach 2: Rise times
No major differences vs. power law method, but note candidate electron peak in rise time spectrum is now sharper.

Attach 3-9: Waveforms with H~90 and increasing rise times. 
Note fit shown are via Solver's GRG, not NM.
Fits in waves 1-4 give same result for GRG and NM.

Fit in wave 5: NM-> H72 t102 vs. GRG-> H80 t25
Fit in wave 6: NM-> H96 t128  vs. GRG-> H90 t23 
GRG risetimes are more realistic. This appears to be due to very short baseline pre-rise.
Will increase in next run.

Fit in wave 7 is rare pile-up event. Code cannot yet cope. Bad fit.
  20   Tue Jun 15 13:15:48 2021 CBR14 analysis
Fit: line + power law + line
Free parameters: 2x boundary points between lines
Algorithm: Nelder-Mead, 20 iterations.

Attach 1: Wave amplitudes. 
Pulse not shown at 1000 channels.
Obvious signal from Bismuth source with visible peaks. Not all peak origins clear.

Attach 2: Risetimes.
Pick-up / microphonic noise quite evident (compare with background run with B-grade silicon)
Pulser relatively well-defined in risetimes
Electrons not well defined

Attach 3: Waveform for electron candidate fitted as risetime = 26 samples
Attach 4: Waveform for electron candidate fitted as risetime = 153 samples

Visual difference between the two unclear, aside from noise.
Looks like fitting function is failing. Will have to change algorithm to draw any conclusions.
  18   Fri Jun 11 10:56:45 2021 CBR13
Fit: line + power law + line
Free parameters: 2x boundary points between lines
Algorithm: Nelder-Mead, 20 iterations.

Attach 1: Wave amplitudes. 
Peak at 300 is pulser.
Some physics events in between obvious noise and pulser.
No obvious signal from Bismuth source

Attach 2: Alpha (?) wave sample. Rise time ~ 200 samples.
In spite of no signal from source, some alphas are visible.
  17   Tue Jun 8 11:04:36 2021 CBR11 (long background) dead time

Pulser frequency: 2.165 Hz (462 ms)

Attach 1: Pulser events vs. total events

 

  Pulser Live time Real time Dead %     File closed
R11_0 160369 74090.48 ? ?   R11_0 31/05/2021 04:17
R11_1 141823 65522.23 66398 1.3%   R11_1 31/05/2021 22:43
R11_2 124032 57302.78 58105 1.4%   R11_2 01/06/2021 14:52
R11_3 156246 72185.65 73096 1.2%   R11_3 02/06/2021 11:10
R11_4 121917 56325.65 57054 1.3%   R11_4 03/06/2021 03:01
R11_5 102395 47306.49 47871 1.2%   R11_5 03/06/2021 16:19
R11_6 78135 36098.37 36472 1.0%   R11_6 04/06/2021 02:26
R11_7 93972 43415.06 43822 0.9%   R11_7 04/06/2021 14:37
R11_8 120559 55698.26 56305 1.1%   R11_8 05/06/2021 06:15
R11_9 112937 52176.89 52749 1.1%   R11_9 05/06/2021 20:54
R11_10 126019 58220.78 58875 1.1%   R11_10 06/06/2021 13:16
R11_11 119971 55426.6 56068 1.1%   R11_11 07/06/2021 04:50
R11_12 19822 9157.764 9260 1.1%   R11_12 07/06/2021 07:24
  30   Fri Jun 16 10:42:38 2023 Lucia B, Federico FPowercut during long run on LNL9 - end of shift

On 15/06/2023 morning, around 6:32 am, a powercut caused failure in the Compresed Air Pressure system. Faraday cup was closed by the interlock and the HV was turned off.

We turned off the accelerator, dismounted LNL9 (pictures attached) and mounted Ta1 Edi backing. We left only ACP28 pump on. We also switched off GeBo HV and its cryocooler.

All details can be found in the excel sheet attached to entry 24.

  7   Wed Jun 26 17:04:07 2019 CBNew settings for internal CFD
Tried using settings attached to enable internal CFD.
Restored / DAQ Go. No waveforms.
MIDAS lost connection with the VME crate. Stopped DAQ. Workstation froze few seconds later.
Rebooted, restored settings CarlTest150519 - all OK
  8   Fri Jun 28 18:01:09 2019 CBLong run to test DAQ stability
Left DAQ running with pulser signal to attempt to reproduce error leading loss of communication with VME crate.
Write to disk DISABLED.
  16   Mon Jun 7 17:41:55 2021 CBLong background analysis
Fit: line + power law + line
Free parameters: 2x boundary points between lines
Algorithm: Nelder-Mead, 20 iterations.

Attach 1: Rise times. 
Peak below 200 is pulser.
200 samples should correspond to alphas, according to R3 analysis. 600+ should correspond to slow signals
(electrons?)

Attach 2: Wave amplitudes (pulser not shown).
150-200 channels should be correspond very roughly to 5-6 MeV

Attach 3: An alpha candidate signal. H 163 t 198
Attach 4: A slow physics signal (electron?) candidate. H 100 t 651

Attach 5: Noise with low Chi2. Reported as H2 t 406. Note fit is GRG nonlinear - cannot reproduce dataReader
Nelder-Mead Simplex fit in Excel (working on it).
Attach 6: Noise with high Chi2 value. Reported as H40 t150. As above.

Attach 7: 2D heatmap
  28   Wed Jun 14 11:30:42 2023 Lucia B, Carlo BLNL6-LNL2-LNL9

On 13/06/2023 afternoon we dismounted LNL6 sputtered target and mounted LNL2 (identical to LNL1, one Cr layer). We performed a scan of E_res=309 keV and left overnight under beam. In the morning 14/06/2023 we repeated the scan: the plateau has increased by 50% in height, but was much shorter. After dismounting, we notice witish dots around the beam spot.

We then mounted LNL9 (sputtered) and performed a scan. Very short plateau. We left for a long run.

Pictures of the targets attached (LNL6 after- LNL2 before and after - LNL9 before).

  27   Tue Jun 13 12:44:05 2023 Lucia B, Carlo BLNL4 dismounted - LNL6 mounted

On 12/06/2023 we dismounted LNL4 after approximately 12 C were deposited.

We then mounted LNL6 (sputtered, in-air target). After a scan of 309 keV resonance, we left the target on for an overnight run. In the morning of 13/06/2023, the plateau was at the same level as the day before. We did another scan and left the target for few more hours under beam.

Pictures of targets attached (LNL4 after beam, LNL6 before beam) .

  26   Sun Jun 11 09:18:23 2023 Lucia B, Carlo BLNL4

When opening LNL4 target jar, the valve did not sound as if air was entering it: we suspect the target was actually not properly under vacuum.

We mounted LNL4 target. However, we could not start the measurement because of bad vacuum. Cold trap was warm. We did several N2 washings to get rid of any residual humidity in the beam line.

We had to dismount the target and do several tests with the leak finder before finding out that the problem was a broken O-ring between target and target holder AND damaged chiller's tube valve on target holder.

As a consequence, the target was exposed to air for quite some time. No visible degradation. Some pictures are attached.

We finally started the scan: details in the excel sheet. Target seems to have withstood air humidity!

  25   Fri Jun 9 13:47:24 2023 Lucia B, Carlo BLNL1

We performed the scan on the LNL1 23Na target (details in the excel sheets in previous entry) for the E_p=309 keV resonance. The target has a sharp well defined rising edge, but it quickly deteriorates under beam bombardement (already after 0.1 C we can see the plateau height at same energy decrease). The thickness of the target also appears much larger than what recorded in the target info.

During the night between 8th and 9th June, we left a long run. In the morning we found the Faraday Cup closed and a pressure of a few mbar in the target chamber. We noticed one of the tubes of the chiller was open on the ground. This caused the chiller to stop working around 9pm. The target started to heat up and the tantalum was bent towards the chamber.

We did not find water in the chamber, it was probably spread on the ground before the chiller stopped working. Possibly a microscopic fracture was formed in the backing, causing air to flow inside the chamber and worsening the vacuum. The turbopump was however still on and does not seem damaged.

Pictures of the target before and after beam bombardment are attached.

 

  9   Tue Jul 9 13:05:17 2019 CBJul 8
Found VME crate yesterday reporting AC power failure. Workstation unresponsive.

Power cycled everything and restarted -> all OK.

Long-term stability of the setup appears to be still poor.
ELOG V3.1.4-unknown