AIDA GELINA BRIKEN nToF CRIB ISOLDE CIRCE nTOFCapture DESPEC DTAS EDI_PSA 179Ta CARME StellarModelling DCF K40
  ISOLDE  ELOG logo
Entry  Wed Nov 8 23:46:32 2017, Daid, Charge State Distributions  charge-state-distribution-3.6.jpgcharge-state-distribution-4.0.jpgcharge-state-distribution-4.4.jpgcharge-state-distribution-4.7.jpgcharge-state-distribution-5.0.jpg
    Reply  Thu Nov 9 05:33:50 2017, TD, Charge State Distributions  
Message ID: 57     Entry time: Thu Nov 9 05:33:50 2017     In reply to: 54
Author: TD 
Subject: Charge State Distributions  
> Faraday cup readout at the end of our chamber should change based on whether or not the target is in and also the 59Cu 
beam energy.
> 
> The effect could be as much as 10 to 20%.  At some point, we should check the Faraday cup reading with the CH2 target 
and with the empty target.

For comparison, csd predicts 5.00MeV/u 59Cu?+ -> 4.66MeV/u 59Cu24+ following the 0.5mg/cm2 (CH2)n target

w29> csd

 Charge State Distributions in Solid and Gaseous Targets

 Is target solid(1) or gaseous(2) ? 1

 Enter energy (MeV), mass (amu) and charge of ion: 275 59 29

 Enter minimum and maximum charge states: 1 29

 Energy: 275.0   QNOT:  24.1    RHO:   1.3    EPS:  -64.6

 Charge   % 
    1     0.0
    2     0.0
    3     0.0
    4     0.0
    5     0.0
    6     0.0
    7     0.0
    8     0.0
    9     0.0
   10     0.0
   11     0.0
   12     0.0
   13     0.0
   14     0.0
   15     0.0
   16     0.0
   17     0.0
   18     0.0
   19     0.1
   20     0.5
   21     2.7
   22     9.6
   23    21.9
   24    30.3
   25    23.6
   26     9.4
   27     1.7
   28     0.1
   29     0.0

 Options available: 
    end(1) , medium(2) , ion(3) , charge states(4)
ELOG V3.1.4-unknown