 Wed Oct 18 15:54:26 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Parameters from TALYS 
|
These are the parameters taken from TALYS to further utilize them as inputs for MyGOE.f - generating nuclear levels. In the sheet the masses are target + n while the input mass is the target nuclei. |
|
Thu Oct 26 17:59:17 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Cl37+n
|
Cross Section Distributions for Cl37+n; where macs01 is for l=0, macs11 is for l=1 and macs1 is for the total. This is an example of Gaussian-like behaviour. |
|
Thu Oct 26 18:09:12 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Na23+n
|
Cross Section Distributions for Na23+n;where macs01 is for l=0, macs11 is for l=1and macs1 is for the total. This is an example of logarithmic decline due to high level spacing (stable nuclei). |
|
Wed Nov 1 16:14:37 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Cl35+n
|
Cross Section Distributions for Cl35+n; where macs01 is for l=0, macs11 is for l=1and macs1 is for the total. The most probable value is less than what is expected (around 13 in the EXCEL sheet). |
|
Sat Nov 4 13:18:53 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Gaussian fit of Cl35+n with a binning of 10
|
1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Cl35+n with rebinned total. Experimental cross section is around 12 while the graph shows the maximum probability as around 7.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10.
4. This is the TALYS output for Cl35+n.
5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S). |
|
Sat Nov 4 13:40:39 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Si28+n
|
1. This graph is the exponential decay Si28+n total. Theorotical cross section is between 0-1.5 while the experimental should be towards 1.15
2. This the the distribution of l = 0.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1.
4. This is the TALYS output for Si28+n.
5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S). |
|
Sat Nov 4 13:45:53 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of P31+n
|
1. This graph is fitted P31+n with rebinned to 10. Theorotical cross section is around 2 and the experimental value is 1.74, which relatively match.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10.
4. This is the TALYS output for P31+n.
5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S). |
|
Sat Nov 4 13:56:02 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Ca42+n
|
1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Ca42+n with rebinned to 10 total. Theorotical cross section is around 15 while the experimental is 16.5, which matches well.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10.
4. This is the TALYS output for Ca42+n.
5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S). |
|
Sat Nov 4 14:01:18 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Ca43+n
|
1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Ca43+n with rebinned to 10 total. Theorotical cross section is around 110 while the experimental is 66.1.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10.
4. This is the TALYS output for Ca43+n.
5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S). |
|
Sat Nov 4 14:05:19 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Ne22+n
|
1. This graph is Ne22+n with a log scale. Theorotical cross section is around 0.05 while the experimental is 0.061, which matches relatively well.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with log scale.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with log scale.
4. This is the TALYS output for Ne22+n.
5. mygoe.f input code which consists of TALYS parameters (Gg, D, S). |
|
Mon Nov 6 09:20:53 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, TALYS including MACS
|
| |
|
Wed Nov 8 15:20:17 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, TALYS Parameters from Different Models
|
This is the parameters of Ca42+n and Ca50+n acquired from differen models. They were chosen as they have Gaussian distributions which are consistent with TALYS calculations of MACS. Ca42+n has experimental values while Ca50+n does not. |
|
Thu Nov 30 13:54:25 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Files for Na23+n 6x
|
1 -> macs.root: MACS distribution file
2 -> read.C: file to graph the histogram
3 -> list.dat: reads every run done by mygoe.f
4 -> talys.input: TALYS inputs
5 -> talys.output: output parameters for mygoe.f
6 -> Na24run: to run mygoe.f for Na23+n parameters taken from TALYS |
|
Wed Jan 17 09:17:57 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Ca42+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of Ca42+n with different nuclear models generated by TALYS. When the level density is high enough, the resonances seem to decrease as TALYS obeys the statistical model. |
|
Wed Jan 17 09:23:28 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, P31+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of P31+n with different nuclear models generated by TALYS. |
|
Wed Jan 17 15:58:40 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Cl35+n Variations by Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of Cl35+n with different level density models. Cl35+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model belowe 0.026 MeV. |
|
Wed Jan 17 16:15:49 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Cl36+n Variations by Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of Cl36+n with different level density models. Cl36+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below approx. 0.020 MeV. |
|
Thu Jan 18 10:52:48 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Ar37+n Variations by Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of Ar37+n with different level density models. Ar37+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.022 MeV. |
|
Thu Jan 18 11:08:23 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, K39+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of K39+nwith different level density models. K39+ncannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.028 MeV. |
|
Thu Jan 18 15:43:13 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, K41+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of K41+nwith different level density models. K41+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.022 MeV. |