|
ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
|
699
|
Wed May 28 10:54:14 2025 |
LB | Run 27 |
Run 27 running
28/05/2025
(ignore 26 - in-between run)
We start a new run with real data taking condititon: beam is ok, target density is 9.6e11 cm-2, detectors are moving in-out periodically.
Cooler voltage setpoint 1128 V.
Beam energy = 1.99 MeV/u (from HKR) (same as run 25)
Left arm at 18.86 mm
Right arm IN at 83.69 mm (OUT 37.96 mm)
vertical beam position 0.0 mm
horizontal beam position -3.5mm
Beam intensity ~1e+7 particles.
Target density ~9.6e11 at/cm2
Target temperatures: T1=31.5 K T2=35.2 K
Beam cycle set to 10 seconds.
11;57
All checks OK.
Aida10's rates seems low now, but aida07 is instead jumping between 200 and 4000 following beam.
15:45
Root histograms refreshed.
Temps OK - attach
Stats OK - attach
All checks OK
Leakage OK - attach
Base Current Difference
aida01 fault 0x0 : 0x1 : 1
FPGA Timestamp error counter test result: Passed 15, Failed 1
If any of these counts are reported as in error
The ASIC readout system has detected a timeslip.
That is the timestamp read from the time FIFO is not younger than the last
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_15-45-13.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_15-46-07.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_15-48-27.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_15-48-38.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_15-49-09.png
|
|
|
579
|
Mon Jun 3 08:43:22 2024 |
SD, SHB | Run 26 |
09:44
Run 26 started - Beam no target
Beam energy is being increased from 1.5 to 3 MeV
Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Detectors are positioned fully OUT
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
10:48 (Attachements 1-4)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The detectors currently fully out for tuning.
11:57 (attachments 5-8)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The detectors currently fully out for tuning.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-49-19.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-50-04.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-53-01.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_10-53-44.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-55-41.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-56-17.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-56-36.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_11-57-31.png
|
|
|
698
|
Tue May 27 22:20:11 2025 |
CB, LB,PW | Run 25 - 1.99/2.02 MeV/A |
23:20
JM thinks we cannot see 7Be locus on run 24. Possibly the right arm cannot get close enough.
Stopped moving right arm
Started moving left arm as previously: 32.52 mm -> 77.56 mm
Checked with bunched beam: not clipping. Possibly we could go further in - to be decided.
Started run 25
Target - 1.1E12 atoms/cm2
Beam - 1.2E7 pps
Root histograms refreshed.
Temps OK - attach
Stats OK - attach
All checks OK
Leakage OK - attach
Spectrum browser 1, 7, 8 attached
00:00
Run continues OK
Temps OK, Stats OK, Merger OK
01:15
Run continues OK
Temps OK - attached
Stats OK - attached
Merger OK
Rates OK - attached
Also attached current histograms
03:10
Motors now moving 32.77 -> 77.56 mm. Unclear why, should not affect results.
Target 1.1E12 atoms/cm2
Current 1.4E7 pps
Temps OK - attached
Rates OK - attached
All checks OK
Merger OK
03:37
7Be locus appears to be clearly visible. Attach 18
04:32
Temps OK
Rates OK
Merger OK
05:30
Temps OK
Rates - aida10 showes intermittently high rates around 10k. See attached. Seems to be linked to beam, already observed last night.
06:10
Temps OK
Rates OK - aida10 still counting 10k with beam, 300 without
Merger OK
Histograms attached
7:23- LB,PW
All checks OK, general behaviour consistent with previous observations. Beam current ~ 1E7 pps
8:40
All good, attachment 27 is the spectra. Beam current 1.3E7 pps.
9;50
All good, target very stable at 1E12 at/cm^2. Noticed also Aida01 and aida02 show same behaviour as aida10, but the maximum rate is between 1000-2000 (instead of the 10000-20000 of aida10)
Run 25 stopped 10:45, Run 26 started -> laser spectroscopy laser test |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_23-21-58.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_23-22-16.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_23-23-12.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_23-23-35.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_23-23-44.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_23-24-18.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_23-24-32.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_23-24-58.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_01-13-04.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_01-13-16.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_01-13-49.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_01-14-01.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_01-14-09.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_01-14-14.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_01-14-20.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_03-09-54.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_03-10-12.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_03-47-08.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_05-30-00.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_05-30-11.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_05-30-20.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_06-09-33.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_06-09-40.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_06-09-43.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_06-09-46.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_06-09-53.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2025-05-28_08-38-27.png
|
|
|
578
|
Sun Jun 2 23:38:17 2024 |
JM, EM | Run 25 |
00:38
Run 25 started - Beam on target
Beam energy = 1.5 MeV.
Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Target density ~ 5e11 at/cm2 (Still Fluctuating, after temperature increase)
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 5 minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 5.2e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
01:30 (Attachments 1 - 4)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density seems very unstable: fluctuations from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm2 within 5min
02:37 (Attachments 5 - 8)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is around 5e11 atoms/cm2 with small adjustments
03:32 (Attachments 9 - 12)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is in average 5e11 atoms/cm2 with some small adjustments. Max values up to 3e12 atoms/cm2
One of the injections at 03:43 was not ok and we lost beam for some min. Target density 1e12 atoms/cm2. On 04:00 the beam was back again without any operator intervention.
04:35 (Attachments 13 - 16)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is in average 1e12 atoms/cm2.
05:43 (Attachments 17 - 20)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density decreased to 2e11 atoms/cm2 in the last 40 min
06:43 (Attachments 21 - 24)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....
07:53 (Attachments 25 - 28)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....
08:48 (Attachments 29 - 32)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....
09:40 --> Run 25 stopped.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-08.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-32.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-54.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-35-46.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-30.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-55.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-39-26.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-40-07.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-32.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-56.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-34-20.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-35-16.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-35-47.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-07.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-25.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-39-59.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-44-44.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-07.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-24.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-46-22.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-21.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-49.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-43-48.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-44-02.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-48-07.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-49-47.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-50-51.png
|
|
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-53-01.png
|
|
Attachment 29: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-03.png
|
|
Attachment 30: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-41.png
|
|
Attachment 31: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-47-09.png
|
|
Attachment 32: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-48-17.png
|
|
|
575
|
Sun Jun 2 13:04:41 2024 |
JM, AG, CB, DR | Run 23 - vertical beam position and beam lifetime tests |
14:05
Run 22 stopped. Run 23 started we will now adjust the vertical beam position to see if we observe the beam stripe seen in the last beamtime.
Current vertical beam position 0.0 mm. Horizontal beam position 7.0 mm. Coasting beam.
Beam D+, 1.5 MeV. Storage time ~ 20 minutes. Target ON. Density ~1e11 at/cm2.
XY plot from run 22 with the same settings - attachment 1
Beam stripe looks like it is just on bottom detectors (just )
14:10
New beam settings
Vertical Beam position 5.0mm, Horizontal unchanged. Storage time reduced to ~2 minute
No real change observed. Perhaps some thing more can be seen on top right detector but definitely not like in the Feb experiment.
14:15
New beam settings
Vertical Beam position 9.0mm, Horizontal unchanged.
No real change observed again.
14:20
New beam settings
Vertical Beam position -9.0mm, Horizontal unchanged.
More events observed on bottom left detector but nothing like the Feb measurements. I think we do not have stripe effects like previously.
14:40:50
New Beam settings to check beam lifetime.
Vertical beam position set back to 0.0 mm. Horizontal unchanged
In bunched mode to observed intensity over time.
Injection into ring 2.2e7
15:15
Beam intensity dropped to 1.1e7. Beam lifetime 35 minutes.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
15:24
We removed the target. Beam intensity at 2.2E7
After 35 minutes, the beam intensity is 1.41e7. So target does have effect on beam lifetime! We would like more.
16:05
We will now bring target back in and try to increase density.
16:10
Some sort of GSI-wide failure, we have lost beam entirely. We don't see any effect on our system. Temperatures and leakage currents are stable
Detectors moved fully out for safety
17:15
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
19:15
Still no beam
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
21:15
Still no beam
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
21:40
Beam has returned!
22:00
Target at around 9e11 and appears stable
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
22:33
Beam back in the ring. Beam settings to be updated.
Rates in right hand detectors look slightly different to before - lower in bottom right, slightly higher in top left. Perhaps beam vertical position needs to be lowered slightly.
ASIC check load just to be sure. Rates in aida15 greatly reduced - only temporarily.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_14-04-55.png
|
|
|
694
|
Tue May 27 05:24:05 2025 |
LB,SN, L. Cs. P. J. W. | Run 22, 23 - 1.95 MeV/A |
27/05/2025 ca. 6:00
We start a new run: beam is ok, target density ok, detectors are moving in-out periodically.
Cooler voltage setpoint 1105.7 V
Attachment 8 - beamcalc with actual values
Next entry - beamcalc with set values
Right arm at 19.80 mm
Left arm IN at 77.56 mm (OUT 32.53 mm)
vertical beam position 0.0 mm
horizontal beam position -3.5mm
Beam intensity 1.7e+7 particles.
Target density ~6e11 at/cm2
Target temperatures: T1=31.5 K T2=35.2 K
Beam cycle set to 10 seconds.
All check are Ok!
6:30
Noticed a small spike in all leakage currents, see attachment 1
6:50
all checks ok!
07:40
All checks are Ok!
Aida 10 shows sometimes higher statistics.
09:02
All checks are Ok!
Aida 10 shows sometimes higher statistics.
10:00
Checks OK.
Compression works OK.
Moved to run 23. Now moving RIGHT hand side detectors instead of LEFT hand side.
Motion 37.96 mm -> 83.69 mm
Left arm stationary at 18.86 mm
Planning to change energy around lunch.
11:35
Parameters are OK! Tragte density dropped down a bit: ~6e11 at/cm2
12:35
Parameters are OK! Tragte density dropped down a bit: ~1e12 at/cm2
13:10
Starting beam energy change. Detectors OUT. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_06-31-48.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_07-40-10.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_07-40-21.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_09-22-51.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_09-23-06.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_11-34-21.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_11-34-36.png
|
|
Attachment 8: screenshot-2025-05-29_11-30-30730985236495866200.png
|
|
|
574
|
Sun Jun 2 08:47:01 2024 |
CB, AG | Run 22 - longer rung with 20 min storage |
09:47
12 seconds pre acc
200x cycles
Detector pneumatics IN, not moving
Running in this configuration for the rest of the shift
Target is barely 1E11 atoms/cm2 and keeps decreasing
Temps OK, checks OK, Stats OK
Writing to disk rate OK
11:22
Targets gets thinner and thinner <1E11 atoms/cm2
Temps OK System wide checks OK Merger OK
Rates OK
13:02
Temps OK. Target around 1E11 atoms/cm2
Merger OK
Rates OK |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-47-53.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-48-06.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_11-21-59.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_11-22-27.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_13-02-31.png
|
|
|
573
|
Sun Jun 2 06:41:00 2024 |
CB, AG | Run 21 - tests |
07:41
Switching to bunched beam to check D vs H content.
8:24
Attach 1&2
ONE spill
Detectors fully out
Switched to bunched beam
12 seconds pre-acceleration
100x cycles (600 seconds) -
Loss over 600 seconds 3.97E7 ions to 3.40E7 ions, i.e. negligible.
Attach 3&4
Coasting beam
12 seconds pre-acc
100x cycles
Attch 5&6
Coasting beam
12 seconds pre-acc
100x cycles
Detectors pneumatics IN
Attach 7& 8
Coasting beam
6 seconds pre-acc
100x cycles
Detector pneumatics IN
Attach 8&9
Coasting beam
12 seconds pre acc
200x cycles
Detector pneumatics IN
Running in this configuration for the rest of the shift
Target is barely 1E11 atoms/cm2 and keeps decreasing |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-23-21.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-23-36.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-44-38.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-44-54.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-58-17.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_08-58-25.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-18-02.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-18-10.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-44-16.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_09-44-24.png
|
|
|
692
|
Mon May 26 18:37:17 2025 |
LC, AG, LB, SN | Run 21 |
Run 21 running
26/05/2025 19:42 p.m.
We start a new run with real data taking condititon: beam is ok, target density is 1.1e12 cm-2, detectors are moving in-out periodically.
Cooler voltage setpoint 1105.7 V.
Beam energy = 1.95 MeV/u
Right arm at 19.80 mm
Left arm IN at 77.56 mm (OUT 32.53 mm)
vertical beam position 0.0 mm
horizontal beam position -3.5mm
Beam intensity 2.2e+7 particles.
Target density ~1.1e12 at/cm2
Target temperatures: T1=31.5 K T2=35.2 K
Beam cycle set to 10 seconds.
All check are Ok!
21:44
All check are Ok!
23:10
Data rate to disk ~300 kB/sec
All checks OK
ADC disk Items #6 and ADC data items screenshots - attachments 5 and 6
Target density has dropped slightly to 7e11 at/cm2. This is fine with lithium due to beam lifetime constraints.
00:43
All checks OK
01:52
All checks are OK,
Attached spectra (attachment 7 and 8).
target pressure seems to be back at ca. 1E12 at/cm2
3:27
All checks good.
target pressure went down to 5E11 at/cm2 for a while, then back up to ca. 9E11 at/cm2.
4:49
All checks good
Rates higher on aida10 and aida4 (see attachment 9), monitoring. It is not consistently high but for example aida10 goes 222->20000->300->11000. It seems to follow the detector movement (higher rates when detector are IN)
Data rate to disk ~370kB/s.
Spectra attached in 10-11.
5:11
Still flickering. Attachment 12 with rates.
Data rate to disk around ~400 kB/s
05:30
DAQ has crashed. All statistics on aida read zero. No data through the merger or tape server.
Stopped tape server and then Run control STOP. Most FEEs did not respond to the command and continued to read going and some undefined. Reset aida servers and reloaded webpages. Same status. Have to power cycle. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2025-05-26_19-41-13.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2025-05-26_19-41-25.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2025-05-26_21-43-59.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2025-05-26_21-44-11.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2025-05-26_23-13-16.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2025-05-26_23-13-33.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_01-50-56.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_01-50-39.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_04-45-35.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_04-57-15.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_04-57-00.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2025-05-27_05-10-36.png
|
|
|
572
|
Sat Jun 1 21:56:17 2024 |
JM, EM, EM, TY, CB, AG | Run 20 |
22:56
Run 20 started - beam on target
Beam energy is 1.5 MeV. Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Target density ~ 1e11 at/cm2
Beam intensity at inj ~ 4e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 3minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
01:15
Target density has increased slighty: ~ 4e11 at/cm2 (update: this only lasted about 5 min)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
3:10
Target density has decresed slightly but will come back (hopefully) ~7e10 at/cm2.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
05:15
Target density has been somewhat unstable, between ~7E10 and ~3E12 at/cm2.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
07:37
Run continues. Target density still fluctuating around 1E11 atoms/cm2.
Temperatures OK. Merger OK. Rates OK.
System wide checks as before.
Waveforms OK. See attachments.
Some screenshots from the online analysis. We do not see a peak at 1 MeV. We do however clearly see more D than H2+.
Stopping run to make some tests.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-05.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_23-02-46.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-01.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_01-16-22.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_03-11-55.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_03-12-00.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_05-14-40.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_05-15-00.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-28-30.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-30-22.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-31-21.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-03.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-21.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-42.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-32-49.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-33-00.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-33-45.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-06-02_07-36-41.png
|
|
|
554
|
Tue May 28 12:38:31 2024 |
TD, JM, CB | Run 2 - Alpha background run |
13.35 FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 1
ADC data item rates OK - attachment 2
overall rate dominated by 2x hot channels aida15
per FEE64 Stat spectra - attachment 3
spectra consistent with April alpha background test
note high HEC data stats for aida12 asic#2 - can probably be fixed by ASIC control check
per 1.8.W spectra - 20us FSR - attachments 4-5
note 100kHz ripple observed for some FEE64s cf. https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/544
Run stopped 15:15 |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-28_13-35-03.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-28_13-34-30.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-28_13-33-19.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-05-28_13-36-30.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-05-28_13-37-16.png
|
|
|
569
|
Sat Jun 1 07:16:15 2024 |
CB, AB, EM, JM | Run 19 - beam target overlap |
Morning shift
08:16 - as run 18, target off
9:00 Increased storage time to 5 minutes. Aquired data after initial beam loss. Attach 1 &2. Far less H2+ vs D.
Temps OK
Rates as before
10:00 beam being optimised to reduce 2H+ content
Rates in aida 13, 14 suddenly spike as during overnight. Checkloaded repeatedly. No effect. Increased thresholds in 13, 14 to 0x32 bringing them in line with 15,16.
12:50
We started test with beam
Test1 ( Attached 12-52-55)
Horiz. offset: 8mm
Max vuel on 1.5MeV =1480 counst
Test2
Horiz. offset: 7mm
Test3
Horiz. offset: 6mm
target density=2.4E11
Test4
Horiz. offset: 5mm
target density=from 1.7E11 to 2.5E11
Test5
Horiz. offset: 4mm
target density=from 5.6E11 to 1.1E11 several fluctuations
Test6
Horiz. offset: 3mm
target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations. Until now we do not see a clear signel from the reaction!
Test7
Horiz. offset: 2mm
target density=1.1E11 several fluctuations.
Test8
Beam back again. Coasting beam. Detectors IN
Horiz. offset: 8mm
xy and energy histograms - attachment 12 and 13.
Test9
Bunched beam Detectors IN
Horiz. offset: 8mm
xy and energy histograms - attachment 14 and 15.
Test10
Horiz. offset: 6mm
xy and energy histograms - attachment
target:1.6E11
xy and energy histograms - attachment 16 and 17.
Afternoon shift
From previous overlap tests we can see that moving the beam position does cause a change in the number of events observed in the detectors.
But the change in events appears to be due to beam halo hitting the detectors rather than elastic scattering. New approach required.
We have varied the beam position (horizontal) in 1mm steps from 0mm to 9mm (the maximum allowed). We do this with the target ON and then with the target OFF.
Integral of events ~1.5 MeV taken . Difference between the target and no target plotted to gauge overlap position.
Note we have moved left arm fully out as we were worried about beam hitting dssds on injection. Will check overlap with right dssds only as left dssds have very low rate at this position.
We have determined the overlap position is about 7.0mm horizontal
Attachment 18 shows initial scan.
Attachment 19 shows a second scan in the region we highlighted as possible overlap. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-15-54.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_09-16-11.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-23-17.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_10-29-48.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-52-55.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_12-58-44.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-06-01.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-12-10.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-18-32.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-27-12.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_13-34-07.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-18-55.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-19-10.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-28-08.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-29-26.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-31.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-01_14-39-43.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Overlap1.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Overlap2.png
|
|
|
505
|
Sat Feb 10 17:05:13 2024 |
TD | Run 15 - background |
17.55 DAQ continues G22-86/R15_11
alpha background
DSSSD bias OK - attachment 1
ambient temperature 17.0 deg C
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 2
WR timestamps OK - attachment 3
ADC data item stats - attachment 4
rates dominated by 'hot' channels aida01 ( 85k ) and aida15 ( 11k ) - all other FEE64s c. 0Hz
stats zero'd 17.57
per FEE64 Rate & Stat spectra - attachments 5-6
Stat spectra not zero'd recently - evidence of scattering ( rates varies with strip # )?
aida01 ( p+n ) and aida03 ( n+n ) ASIC settings - attachments 7-8
slow comparator 0x64
Merger and Merger stats OK - attachments 9-10
DSSSD leakage current = attachment 11
shows data for 28-30.1.24 ?
online sort per DSSSD x-y hit patterns - attachment 12
ML vacuum pressure & cave temperature - attachments 13-14
23.01 DAQ continues G22-86/R15_17
alpha background
DSSSD bias OK - attachment 15
ambient temperature 17.0 deg C
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 16
ADC data item stats - attachment 17
rates dominated by 'hot' channels aida01 ( 72k ) and aida15 ( 11k ) - all other FEE64s c. 0Hz
TapeServer - attachment 18
DSSSD leakage current = attachment 19
DSSSD #2 transient c. few hundred nA
online sort per DSSSD x-y hit patterns - attachment 20 |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_17-54-47.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_17-55-42.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_17-56-11.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_17-56-47.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_17-57-29.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_17-58-40.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_17-59-30.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_17-59-50.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_18-00-09.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_18-00-44.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_18-03-01.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_18-03-19.png
|
|
Attachment 13: tep.PNG
|
|
Attachment 14: vac.PNG
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_23-01-27.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_23-00-50.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_23-01-08.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_23-02-34.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_23-02-53.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_23-03-09.png
|
|
|
504
|
Sat Feb 10 10:00:44 2024 |
AR RSS JM CB | Run 13, 14 |
System checks: all ok
Attatchment 1: Rates ok
Attatchment 2: Temperatures ok
Attatchment 3: Waveform layout 7
Attatchment 4: Waveform layout 8
Attatchment 5: Waveform layout 1
Attatchment 6: Waveform layout 2
Attatchment 7: Leakage current ok
Moved pneumatic / servo for right / left arms in /out
Attachment 8: left servo fully in
9: left pneumatic in (beam is clipped)
10: left pneumatic & servo in (beam is clipped)
11: right servo in
12: right pneumatic in
13: right pneumatic & serve in
Some clear issues with strip mapping persist.
Strip map
#map strip: 01:00 left/top side, 02:00 right/bottom side (from beam view)
stripMap 1 2
stripMap 2 1
stripMap 3 2
stripMap 4 1
stripMap 5 2
stripMap 6 1
stripMap 7 2
stripMap 8 1
stripMap 9 1
stripMap 10 2
stripMap 11 1
stripMap 12 2
stripMap 13 1
stripMap 14 2
stripMap 15 1
stripMap 16 2
/////// UPDATE /////////
System checks: all ok - except waveform for AIDA 15 in layout 2, it has a low rate compared to others
Attatchment 14: Rates ok
Attatchment 15: Temperatures ok
Attatchment 16: Waveform layout 7
Attatchment 17: Waveform layout 8
Attatchment 18: Waveform layout 2
Attatchment 19: Waveform layout 1
Attatchment 20: Leakage current ok
/////// UPDATE //////
After beam stiring - layout of xy histograms are updated
DSSD0 and DSSD3 have the correct orientation,
DSSD1 needs to be flipped mirrored on the yaxis (i.e. right needs to be left, and left needs to be right but up and down are correct)
DSSD2 needs to be flipped on the xaxis (i.e. up needs to be down and down needs to be up but left and right are correct)
Horizontal offset in YR3 target = 9mm
Horizontal offset in YR7 target = 9mm
Horizontan offset in YR9 target = -9mm
Vertial offset in YR9 target = -8mm
Attatchment 21: Beam profile before stiring
Attatchment 22: Beam profile after stiritng - much better, hitting detectors less.
/// UPDATE ///
Mapping for the sort code has been fixed so that detectors are orientated correctly as if looking at the detectors downstream.We was missing dssdPNisX command which lets the sort code know if the PN FEEs correspond to X or Y. Correct mapping is now;
stripMap 1 1
stripMap 2 2
stripMap 3 1
stripMap 4 2
stripMap 5 1
stripMap 6 2
stripMap 7 2
stripMap 8 1
stripMap 9 2
stripMap 10 1
stripMap 11 1
stripMap 12 2
stripMap 13 1
stripMap 14 2
stripMap 15 1
stripMap 16 2
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_11-01-27.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_11-01-42.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_11-02-37.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_11-02-58.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_11-03-25.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_11-03-47.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_11-05-40.png
|
|
Attachment 8: l_s_in.png
|
|
Attachment 9: l_p_in.png
|
|
Attachment 10: l_p&s_in.png
|
|
Attachment 11: r_s_in.png
|
|
Attachment 12: r_p_in.png
|
|
Attachment 13: r_s&p_in.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_13-41-54.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_13-42-11.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_13-43-10.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_13-47-04.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_13-48-38.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_13-49-39.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_13-50-13.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_14-12-54.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_14-56-15.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-10_16-15-27.png
|
|
|
566
|
Fri May 31 19:12:01 2024 |
CB, EM | Run 13 - test with beam |
20:00
The beam is set at the correct energy, operators cross-checked it again. What we see at 750 is due to the molecular beam. The operotors are trying to optimize and get rid of this in the next 30min.
Temps and system checks OK
Leakage current OK
Merger and tape server OK
Potentiometer at 28.06 mm and 29.23 mm
20:30
Keep going with the beam tests. A new peak appears around 950 keV( See attached). Still try to understand what it is. The operators keep going |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-13-46.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-27-58.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-32-59.png
|
|
|
565
|
Fri May 31 06:01:55 2024 |
JM, TY, PW, EM, CB | Run 12 - beam on target |
07:00
Run 12 started. D+ beam is incident on the target at 1.5 MeV
Beam intensity in the ring is ~4e7 particles
Target density shows some fluctuations but is ~1e11 atoms/cm2. Target temp 35K
Detectors are positioned fully out (Left arm 18.86mm and right arm 19.8 mm ) and are not moving
Ring pressure looks OK, YR09 E target sensor seems unaffected by the target currently reads ~5e-11 mbar.
Beam is in the ring for ~15s.
Temps and system checks OK
Leakage current OK
Merger and tape server OK
Horizontal beam position 8 mm and vertical beam position 0mm for overlap with target.
Statistics - attachment 1
Energy histogram - attachment 2
XY plot - attachment 3
We see high rate at 1.5 MeV in left dssds but very little in right dssds. XY plots also show counts are concerntrated in a very circular distribution.
07:15
Gleb has just called and requires access to the cave to check on a turbo pump in the source.
Ring vacuum looks good
Beam will be down for 10-15 minutes only hopefully.
07:45
Beam is back in the ring but injection requires optimisation.
09:00
There are some issues with the source that require a few hours to resolve. Potentially until 7 or 8 pm tonight. We have about an hour before work starts.
We have done a quick test of the motors and moved the left and right arms in using the pnuematic only.
New position left arm = 62.71 mm , right arm = 64.6 mm.
We observed the rates in left detectors went up significantly. In the right detectors we observed little increase.
See attached xy plot - attachment 4
See attached energy histogram - attachment 5
Beam intensity has dropped significantly - below 1e6 particles so even at in positons we see few counts at the moment.
09:25
Source has degraded pretty rapidly so beam will be stopped for now.
Detectors moved back out.
Target nozzle moved from X= -13000, Y=2500 to X= -11000, Y=2500. S1 has dropped to 5e-10 mbar.
Note Gleb mentioned that last night it was likely a large proportion of the ions stored were molecular hydrogen not deuterium.
16:18
Temps and system checks OK
Leakage current OK
Merger and tape server OK
18:10
Temps and system checks OK
Leakage current OK
Merger and tape server OK
19:38
Operators are trying to optimize some beam. For now the beam is lower than it should be probably because is easy to work with the source like that.
Temps and system checks OK
Leakage current OK
Merger and tape server OK
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_07-32-33.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_07-33-19.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_07-33-57.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_09-17-08.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_09-21-40.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_16-19-29.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_16-29-22.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_16-31-36.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_18-12-36.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_19-42-42.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_19-45-55.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_20-04-54.png
|
|
|
564
|
Thu May 30 13:31:01 2024 |
JM, CB, PW, YL | Run 11 - beam on target overlap |
14:30
Run 11 started. D+ beam in the ring at 1.5 MeV.
No target at the moment. Valves to the interaction chamber will soon be opened.
Stats and histograms zero'd, monitoring code reset.
All checks and temps OK
Leakage currents OK
ADC data items statistics - attachment 1
Beam in ring ~30s and manipulation ~2s
Beam intensity ~ 5.7E7
16:40
System check OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
Beam in the ring
Waiting for target , Hydrogen green
18:50
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
Beam ~4x10^7
Target tuning ongoing
22:05
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
Currently no beam -> asked operator to check source
Target tuning ongoing
23:22
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
Currently no beam -> operators are optimizing the intensity of the beam
Optimizing target density as well
00:55
The overlaping test started by moving the beam only in the y axis.
02:00
Overlap test is over and was found that the optimal position for the horizontal axis is 8mm. Beam on target.
Observation of an increase the 1.5 MeV peak in the CARME monitoring code when overlap with the target is found. Attachment 4.
Drop in the beam lifetime is also observed when overlapped with the target.
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
02:48
CRYRING measurement cycle has been made shorter (from 5 to 3 repetitions) to match it with the decreased beam life time due to optimed overlap with target.
04:37
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_14-33-19.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_02-09-35.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_06-57-12.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 20240531_073828.jpg
|
|
|
657
|
Wed Jun 19 12:08:34 2024 |
CB + various | Run 101-105 |
Run 101: no target. See ELOG entry by TD.
Run 102: ??
Run 103: ??
Run 104: After experiment time is over, Gleb tests beam lifetime at "high energies". Some data acquired for 30 minutes.
Run 105: Quick pulser walkthrough. People are working near CARME. Positive polarity 1000-9000 amplitude. |
|
563
|
Thu May 30 09:30:33 2024 |
CB, PW, YL, TD | Run 10 |
10:30
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
10.48 FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 1
WR timestamps OK - attachment 2
ADC data item stats - attachment 3
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachment 4
why do we observe HEC data in aida15 asic #1?
per FEE64 1.8.L spectra - attachments 5-6
ADC to 20MeV FSR - not clear when these spwectra were last zero;d
currently 750keV/u D + no target ?
10.53 All histograms & stats zero'd
Merger, Taper Server etc - attachments 7-8
bind error 98 for NewMerger server - not clear when these messahes were generated - added some returns to monitor whether these, or other, messages are repeated
DSSSD bias & leakage current OK - attachment 9
11:30
We noticed some odd peak structure in the rate energy histograms for the right hand side detectors. We took away the beam but this structure persisted.
This was not observed in the total energy histograms, the reason for this is the applied multiplicity cut to the total histograms. Removing this cut the peaks are clearly visible (attachment 10). Putting the cut back in we see the peaks removed (attachment 11). These events correspond to some noisy strips on the detectors on the right hand side (see attachment 12). Notice the much larger rate on the RHS. Current ADC data items statistics show FEE modules for the RHS also much larger (attachment 13). We did not observe this with no beam (https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/554) but did with beam last night (https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/558) so there nust be some effect of having beam in the ring increasing the number of events on the RHS. Note the detectors are fully out and the events are localised in these strips.
Note we have moved the detectorsand removed beam from the ring in this time period to investigate these peaks.
12:50
Run 10 continues. Temps OK. System checks OK. Merger OK, Tape server OK.
Leakage current OK.
Notice the 'beam peak' at 1.5 MeV is larger in the left hand side (attachment 14)
14:26
We have started the new_optimeren.py on pi@gas-stepper to try and align the gas target. Valves to the interaction chamber are closed.
Setting the nozzle X=-13000, Y=1000 we observe an increase in E4 from 4E-10 mbar to 2E-9 mbar. Moving either side we observe a drop in E4. We take this as the gas target being aligned.
Anton will now open the valves to the gas target.
Run 10 stopped. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_10-48-43.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_10-49-43.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_10-50-34.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_10-51-40.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_10-52-51.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_10-53-53.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_10-56-23.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_10-56-42.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_10-57-56.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_11-35-08.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_11-36-07.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_12-58-20.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_13-10-18.png
|
|
|
384
|
Thu Dec 8 14:41:19 2022 |
PJCS | Results of tests on AIDA PSU in DL T9 |
We opened one up and soldered a co-ax cable to one of the +6v power contacts at the output of the filter board.
Connecting this to a 'scope we observed a level of +/- 5mv noise with no FEE connected.
Connecting one FEE made little difference.
Re-connected the FEE to the power supply in the cabinet and wired a co-ax to a spare FEE power plug.
Ran the system with two FEEs on the bench top and two in the cabinet. The benchtop FEEs were connected to the NIM bin in the cabinet with copper braid.
Using a PB4 in the NIM bin and my test input cards on the FEE mezzanine connector, the following readings were taken using the 'integrate' function in the spectrum browser.
Shaping 8us, negative pulse.
aida02, ASIC1, ch0 Peak width => 16.58 channels ( full 16 bit spectra )
aida03, ASIC1, ch0 Peak width => 18.48 channels ( full 16 bit spectra )
aida04, ASIC1, ch0 Peak width => 18.05 channels ( full 16 bit spectra )
These could be better but the output of the PB4 was not perfect. I think ASIC 1 Ch0 is normally the worst on the mezzanine.
Attachments 1 to 6 are the waveforms and some zoomed in.
The co-ax from the power supply was connected to a 'scope and showed a noise level of +/-50mv.
Fourier analysis of this noise showed two peaks 109kHz and 218kHz. ( Attachments 7 & 8 ) |
Attachment 1: IMG_5492.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 2: IMG_5493.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 3: IMG_5495_small.jpg
|
|
Attachment 4: IMG_5496_small.jpg
|
|
Attachment 5: IMG_5497_small.jpg
|
|
Attachment 6: IMG_5498_small.jpg
|
|
Attachment 7: IMG_5499_small.jpg
|
|
Attachment 8: IMG_5500_small.jpg
|
|