ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
341
|
Tue Mar 1 05:23:02 2022 |
JM, EM | Current status |
06:20
Servo motors moved to fully out position as some work on the beam was neccessary. Beam injection had dropped from ~9e7 to around 1e7. Potentiometer reads 19.10 mm.
Still trying to improve target density. Current setpoint 100 K.
Merger OK
Data rate = 1600 kb/sec
Leakage current = 3.21 uA
System checks OK - wr fails
Base Current Difference
aida01 fault 0xab60 : 0xab8e : 46
aida02 fault 0x88d3 : 0x8900 : 45
aida03 fault 0x23aa : 0x23d8 : 46
aida04 fault 0x15d7 : 0x1605 : 46
aida05 fault 0x2f03 : 0x2f0f : 12
White Rabbit error counter test result: Passed 0, Failed 5
Understand the status reports as follows:-
Status bit 3 : White Rabbit decoder detected an error in the received data
Status bit 2 : Firmware registered WR error, no reload of Timestamp
Status bit 0 : White Rabbit decoder reports uncertain of Timestamp information from WR
Avg ring pressure = 4.3E-10 mbar.
06:40
Target density still very low. Setpoint back to 116 K. Detectors still fully out, very low rutherford rate.
Attempted to move nozzle to increase density, already on maximum point.
06:50
Setpoint to 95 k. Small increase in target density, however this was temporary
|
Attachment 1: 2022-03-01_06-42-53-ExRate.png
|
|
578
|
Sun Jun 2 23:38:17 2024 |
JM, EM | Run 25 |
00:38
Run 25 started - Beam on target
Beam energy = 1.5 MeV.
Horizontal beam position = 7.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Target density ~ 5e11 at/cm2 (Still Fluctuating, after temperature increase)
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 62.71, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 5 minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 5.2e-11 mbar.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
01:30 (Attachments 1 - 4)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density seems very unstable: fluctuations from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm2 within 5min
02:37 (Attachments 5 - 8)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is around 5e11 atoms/cm2 with small adjustments
03:32 (Attachments 9 - 12)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is in average 5e11 atoms/cm2 with some small adjustments. Max values up to 3e12 atoms/cm2
One of the injections at 03:43 was not ok and we lost beam for some min. Target density 1e12 atoms/cm2. On 04:00 the beam was back again without any operator intervention.
04:35 (Attachments 13 - 16)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is in average 1e12 atoms/cm2.
05:43 (Attachments 17 - 20)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density decreased to 2e11 atoms/cm2 in the last 40 min
06:43 (Attachments 21 - 24)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....
07:53 (Attachments 25 - 28)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....
08:48 (Attachments 29 - 32)
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
The target density is fluctuating from 1e11 to 1e12 atoms/cm without any change....
09:40 --> Run 25 stopped.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-08.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-32.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-34-54.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_01-35-46.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-30.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-38-55.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-39-26.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_02-40-07.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-32.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-33-56.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-34-20.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_03-35-16.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-35-47.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-07.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-36-25.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_04-39-59.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-44-44.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-07.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-45-24.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_05-46-22.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-21.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-42-49.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-43-48.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_06-44-02.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-48-07.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-49-47.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-50-51.png
|
|
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_07-53-01.png
|
|
Attachment 29: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-03.png
|
|
Attachment 30: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-46-41.png
|
|
Attachment 31: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-47-09.png
|
|
Attachment 32: Screenshot_from_2024-06-03_08-48-17.png
|
|
720
|
Thu Jun 5 08:50:00 2025 |
JM, CF, CB, EW | Run 51 - background |
09:49
DSSD4 has been biased to 100V in steps of 5V from 60V. It was previously stable overnight at 60V - attachment 1
Will keep an eye on it but looks OK at the moment. Current bias and leakage current - attachment 2
I have reset DSSD4 FEES (13,14,15,16) to the LEC and lowered the thresholds to be in line with other FEES.
Current slow comparator threshold for all FEES is 0x14 (200 keV).
Attachment 3 shows current ADC data items statistics.
Started a new run 51 with no beam and no target. Access to the cave is allowed.
Current data rate is 800 kB/sec.
All statistics and histograms in aida zero'd
12:57
Temps OK
Rates OK - attached
Merger OK
System wide checks
14:58
Temps - OK
Rates - OK
Merger - OK
15:00
Beam tuning to start soon. No storage. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2025-06-05_09-38-05.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2025-06-05_09-46-08.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2025-06-05_09-51-43.png
|
|
741
|
Thu Jun 12 14:22:27 2025 |
JM, CB, TD, CF, JG, EM | Run 73 |
15:00
Cave closed, waiting for beam to come back.
Reset all ASIC settings to those in elog 737
DSSD4 remains OFF and is set to the MEC channel.
ADC data items and data writing to disk - Attachments 1+2
While the cave has been closed we warmed the target up to 80K and have now cooled back to 30.5K to increase the density which was dropping into the 10^11 range. We have now recovered densities in the mid 10^12 at/cm2 range.
Detector leakage current plot - Attachment 3,4
All system checks OK
Started at 16:20
EM and JG trying to get scintillator signals in MBS
Configuration completed?
Stopped 16:32 |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2025-06-12_15-23-37.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2025-06-12_15-23-51.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2025-06-12_15-29-14.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2025-06-12_15-31-19.png
|
|
507
|
Sun Feb 11 13:28:46 2024 |
JM, CB, TD | Run16 - beam on target |
13:37 Run started - no beam in the ring (One of the ring magnets was still on RED when it should have been set to green by HKR)
14:28 Beam ON - still observe beam halo on DSSD0 (Top left)
YR09 Vertical and horizontal offsets set to -9.0 mm
14:36 Target ON, Beam ON
We can see the beam halo on the detectors again in the same position as previous tests. The energy histograms for the detectors show only low energy events, except bottom left detector where we see a peak around 20 MeV. With the target on we see additional events but we only see events at ~20MeV for the bottom detector still in the bottom left detector. We are moving the detectors IN to try and see events from scattering of the beam on the target. We may not be hitting the target with the beam.
15.29 We observe data in DSSD # 0, 2, 3 (top left, bottom left, bottom right) which is consistent with a line beam halo on the detector. The top right detector is positioned higher by ~10 mm than the top left detector so it is not unphysical to not see any events in this detector from the halo.
The energy of events in each detector is not consistent however. In DSSD #0 and 3 we see mainly low energy events (some small number of 20 MeV events is seen) but in DSSD #2 we see mainly higher energy (20 MeV) events. See attached energy histograms, xy and Ex vs x plots (attachments 1-3).
This is consistent with the data from channels seen in MIDAS for aida04 (DSSD #0) and aida12 (DSSD#2).
Switched FEE64 range bit frpom 20MeV FSR to 1GeV FSR to see if any events are over the 20 MeV range of the low energy channel . Slow comparator from 0x64 to 0x5. We see no events just above 20 MeV in aida04 but do in aida12. See attachments 4 & 5
No data ( > 20MeV nominal ) out of range in DSSSD #1
FEE range set back to FSR to 20 MeV and slow comparator set back to 0x64
15:57 Beam on target. Left arm fully out (pot 18.8 mm), right arm fully in (pot 83.69 mm). Beam injection ~1e6, target density 2e11. Cycle time between 4-13 s.
Leaving for more stats
17.30 Routine system checks
DAQ continues file G22-88/R16_14
DSSSD bias and leakage current OK - attachments 8 & 28
DSSSD #2 bias -100V, all other DSSSDs -150V
ambient temperature +17.0 deg C
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 9
All system wide checks OK
WR timestamp OK - attachment 10
aida01 & aida03 ASIC settings - attachments 11-12
AIDA ADC, PAUSE, DISC, correlation - attachments 13-16
ADC data item rates OK
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 17-18
note change in rates for aida12 & aida13 - presumably due to beam cycle?
per FEE64 1.8.L, 1.8.H and 1.8.W 20us FSR spectra - attachments 19-24
Merger, Merger stats and TapeServer - attachments 25-27
18.10 ML CRYRING vacuum - attachment 29
FEE spectrum browser statistics attachment 30 - not many missing channels - aida04 asic 2 perhaps?
18:40 End of run. Target x position moved out by 3000. Faraday cup to the ring closed. Detectors moved fully OUT.
Run 17 started - alpha background
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_15-32-52.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_15-33-06.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_15-33-35.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_15-24-58.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_15-27-54.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 20230524_103830.jpg
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_15-57-48.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-29-16.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-29-35.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-30-08.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-30-18.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-30-24.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-30-54.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-36-57.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-37-25.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-37-52.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-31-54.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-32-01.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-33-15.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-33-51.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-34-25.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-35-03.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-35-56.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-36-35.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-38-32.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-38-49.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-38-58.png
|
|
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_17-41-37.png
|
|
Attachment 29: Capture.PNG
|
|
Attachment 30: Screenshot_from_2024-02-11_18-27-56.png
|
|
219
|
Mon Feb 21 17:26:19 2022 |
JM, CB, SHB, OH (remotely) | Beam ON run 53 |
21/2/22 16:00
Call from main control room, beam is ON, probably has been for several hours judging by rate on xy total plot.
Changes made to online monitoring code by OH, include setting to only 1 DSSD, correct offsets from the pulser walkthrough, offline analysis capabilities and X/Y position correction.
Monitoring code restarted in CARME_SORT/build_no_output
17:31 Run 50 ended, run 51 started now beam is definitely in the ring. Tried to insert span zero schottky into aida2 correlation scalar, however rate was far too high.
18:03 Removed span zero schottky signal, started new run 52.
With beam ON we noticed some missing channels in the xy total plot. Aida 1 and 2 stat totals on spectrum browser show missing channels. Asic check on both to no effect. Fees power cycled.
19:57 Started run 53. Currently waiting for beam
21:20 Beam ON
1*L plots checked for aida 1, several channels showed no data (noise)
Slow comparator LEC threshold lowered to 0x32 to aida 1, checked 1*L plots and channels are now showing lots of noise. So those channels appear to be quiet using 0x64 threshold. (attachment 3)
Threshold increased back to 0x64
22:33
System checks OK -white rabbit fails on all. ~30 seperation
Temperatures OK
Statistics within range - new scalars added for aida02 and aida05
Data being written ~300 kb/sec
Leakage current ~3.6 uA
00:39
System checks checks OK -white rabbit fails on all. ~42 seperation
Temperatures OK
Statistics within range with new scalars
Data being written 256 kb/sec
Leakage current ~3.615 uA
XY counts dominated by hot channels - most blue pixels are ~10 counts
|
Attachment 1: 2022-02-21_18-50-06-xyTotal.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2022-02-21_19-05-27-aida1-4-rate.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 2022-02-21_22-17-54-aida1-1*L-lowerThreshold.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 2022-02-21_22-35-19-goodEvents.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 2022-02-21_22-35-53-ADC-dataitems.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 2022-02-21_22-36-28-aida-correlation.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 2022-02-21_22-58-18-Ex-histogram.png
|
|
Attachment 8: 2022-02-21_22-59-22-XY-total.png
|
|
Attachment 9: 2022-02-22_00-42-14-XY-total.png
|
|
206
|
Thu Feb 17 16:26:27 2022 |
JM, CB, SD | Gauges OFF, Pulser Movement tests |
Edinburgh group ion gauge turned OFF -> decrease in leakage current from 10.05 uA to 6.5 uA
GSI vacuum group ion gauge turned OFF -> decrease in leakage current from 6.5 uA to 3.63 uA
GSI large ion pump turned ON -> no effect on leakage current
Motors moved IN the same as elog 201. No significant increase in leakage current as moved further into the chamber (attachment 1). Pulser widths follow similar path as previous tests. Aida1 and 2 statrt with larger pulser widths which reduce as are moved into the chamber. Aida3,4 start lower than aida1,2 and remain at same level throughout. (attachment2)
RF ring signal removed from aida5. Data rate dropped back to ~20 kb/sec, Merger rate ~80,000 items/sec
Noise peak on aida1 appears reduced after gauges switched OFF with detector fully out (attachment 3) coompare to elog 201
Noise peak is removed once detector is moved in. (attachment 4)
Ey histogram (attachment 5) shows multiple peaks for the same pulser amplitude.
XY total pixels plot (attachment 6)
1.8 waveforms for aida 1,2,5 (attachment 7) |
Attachment 1: leakage-potentiometer2_1.png
|
|
Attachment 2: pulserWidth_potentiometer2.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 2022-02-17_16-54-27aida125-1.8*L-fullyout.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 2022-02-17_16-48-55-aida125-1.8*L-fullyin.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 2022-02-17_17-29-25-Eyhistogram-pulserON.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 2022-02-17_18-40-14-xyTotal-pulser.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 2022-02-17_22-59-53-aida125-1.8*W.png
|
|
207
|
Thu Feb 17 18:19:16 2022 |
JM, CB, SD | Alpha Background run 46 |
Both GSI vacuum group and edinburgh ion gauges OFF
Fees power cycled. All system checks OK.
Writing to file, alpha background overnight.
Moved detector IN 2mm. Noise appears reduced with any distance moved in so overnight spectra to be taken while IN. Not moving further in as possible beam tomorrow.
22:44
Leakage current stable, slowly decreasing ~3.57 uA (attachment 1)
Statistics look OK
Temperatures OK
System wide check all pass - OK
Noise appears much reduced on spectrum Browser channels. (attachement 2). Compared to same plot on elog 197
XYtotal per pixel (attachment 3)
Ex histogram (attachment 4)
|
Attachment 1: 2022-02-17_22-41-45-leakageCurrent.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2022-02-17_22-51-07-aida1-3*L.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 2022-02-17_22-54-06-XYTotal.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 2022-02-17_22-56-38-ExHist.png
|
|
196
|
Tue Feb 15 14:59:37 2022 |
JM, CB, RJC | Pulser walkthrough |
16:00
Check Fee temperatures: all green (see attachment 1)
Check statistics tab: ADC data items (see attachment 2)
Good events (see attachment 3)
ADC coincidence-info #8 (see attachment 4)
Check NewMerger tab: (see attachment 5)
Check Leakage current: (see attachment 6)
Check the following plots: LowEnergyExTotal (see attachment 7)
LowEnergyEyTotal (see attachment 8)
LowEnergyXYTotalDSSD0 (empty.)
Check Spectrum Browser tab: (see attachment 9)
Check system wide checks tab: all okay.
All is good.
17:00
Pulser walkthrough completed on run R38
290
280
270
250
240
230
220
210
210 / 10
230 / 10 (can't see)
210 / 5 (can't see)
190
90
150
130
70
50
10 (can't see)
30
15 (can't see)
Pulser to 70 |
Attachment 1: temp_2022-02-15_11-24-49.png
|
|
Attachment 2: stats_2022-02-15_11-26-15.png
|
|
Attachment 3: good_events_2022-02-15_16-05-29.png
|
|
Attachment 4: correlation_8_2022-02-15_16-06-56.png
|
|
Attachment 5: merger_2022-02-15_16-07-47.png
|
|
Attachment 6: leakage_current2022-02-15_16-08-30.png
|
|
Attachment 7: lowEnergyExTotal_2022-02-15_16-10-38.png
|
|
Attachment 8: lowEnergyEy_2022-02-15_16-11-31.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Spectrum_Browser_tab_2022-02-15_16-20-59.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Walkthrough_0215_1-2.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Walkthrough_1502_3-4.png
|
|
564
|
Thu May 30 13:31:01 2024 |
JM, CB, PW, YL | Run 11 - beam on target overlap |
14:30
Run 11 started. D+ beam in the ring at 1.5 MeV.
No target at the moment. Valves to the interaction chamber will soon be opened.
Stats and histograms zero'd, monitoring code reset.
All checks and temps OK
Leakage currents OK
ADC data items statistics - attachment 1
Beam in ring ~30s and manipulation ~2s
Beam intensity ~ 5.7E7
16:40
System check OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
Beam in the ring
Waiting for target , Hydrogen green
18:50
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
Beam ~4x10^7
Target tuning ongoing
22:05
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
Currently no beam -> asked operator to check source
Target tuning ongoing
23:22
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
Currently no beam -> operators are optimizing the intensity of the beam
Optimizing target density as well
00:55
The overlaping test started by moving the beam only in the y axis.
02:00
Overlap test is over and was found that the optimal position for the horizontal axis is 8mm. Beam on target.
Observation of an increase the 1.5 MeV peak in the CARME monitoring code when overlap with the target is found. Attachment 4.
Drop in the beam lifetime is also observed when overlapped with the target.
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
02:48
CRYRING measurement cycle has been made shorter (from 5 to 3 repetitions) to match it with the decreased beam life time due to optimed overlap with target.
04:37
System OK
Temperature OK
Statistics same as before
Merger and server OK
Leakage currents OK
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-05-30_14-33-19.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_02-09-35.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-31_06-57-12.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 20240531_073828.jpg
|
|
283
|
Fri Feb 25 15:38:40 2022 |
JM, CB, PJW | Run 55, 56, 59 root histograms |
Run55 - detector out, start 22/2/22 13:20, end 23/2/22 10:49
Run 56 - detector moved in, start 23/2/22 10:4, end 23/2/22 15:46
Run 59 - detector position optimised, detector position in, start 23/2/22 17:57, end 24/2/22 00:04 |
Attachment 1: Run55_lowEnergy_Exhist.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Run55_lowEnergy_Eyhist.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Run56_lowEnergy_Exhist.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Run56_lowEnergy_Eyhist.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Run59_lowEnergy_Exhist.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Run59_lowEnergy_Eyhist.png
|
|
735
|
Tue Jun 10 22:38:59 2025 |
JM, CB, PJW | Run 65 |
23:40
Offline anlaysis shows two clear peaks for DSSD1 and 2 at very low energies close to the threshold. One must be elastics and the other a noise peak.
For DSSD3 the noise level is so exceptionally high due to the low threshold that nothing can be discerned from background.
Therefore I decided to stop the previous run and increase the slow comparator threshold for DSSD3 from 50 keV to 80 keV (same as DSSD2).
Run 65 started.
150 keV/u beam on target, Target overlap confirmed with lifetime measurement using bunched beam.
Detectors in with servos only. Both arms are IN and stationary.
Left potentiometer = 36.54 mm
Right potentiometer = 37.96 mm
Data rate has dropped to 1.5 MB/sec and merger is between 600k and 900k.
Stats attached at new thresholds.
Stats zero'd to see number of pause and resume overnight.
02:30
Some reaction counts visible on monitoring histograms (rate v low)
Checks OK, same fee (aida16 fails clock and adc as before)
pause info items after a few hours attached
05:00
We see the peaks much more clearly now. Rate is low but they are there. Target density looks like it has been fluctuating in the low 10^12 region.
Note for this energy with 1e8 pps, 1e12 target density I estimate ~2 counts/h per detector for the 3He peak.from our spreadsheet calculator. After 6 hours of this run I saw about 10-15 counts in the peak of DSSD2, perhaps the same in DSSD3. DSSD1 has missing strips so is harder to see. This rate is about 48 hours for 5% (if we had 4 dssds).
Checks OK
Leakage current of dssd4 has been stable at 40V for a while now. Pushed voltage up to 75V with leakage current stable. At 80V it started to go over current
Turned bias to 60V and have left on at this level. It looks stable. Perhaps in the morning it can be pushed to close to 100V.
07:15
Temps OK
System wide checks: 16 fails ADC calibration, 14 fails WR decoder
Rates OK, some Pause/resume statementes overnight. See attached x2
Merger OK. 1.5 Mb/s
Peaks clearly visible in two detectors.
08:25 All checks OK. DSSD 4 to 75V - OK.
09:10 All checks OK. DSSD 4 to 80V. Trying to improve target (2-4E12). |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2025-06-10_23-46-27.png
|
|
Attachment 2: offline.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2025-06-11_02-29-55.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2025-06-11_05-06-46.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2025-06-11_07-21-12.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2025-06-11_07-21-40.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2025-06-11_07-24-26.png
|
|
513
|
Wed Feb 14 14:59:13 2024 |
JM, CB, NP, ML, AG, AB | Run 27 -Beam on target optimisation |
Run 27 Started to check optimsation of the beam - target overlap.
Beam intensity at injection is roughly 1e7 particles
Target density apporx 4.2e11 atoms/cm2 and stable.
Ring pressure is below 1e-10 mbar for all ring sections and stable
First optimisation procedure was to vary the horizontal beam position and see the effect on the count rate in detector #0 (top left) (see elog 509). Beam position was scanned from -9 and -4. Attachment 1 shows the maximum in count rate around the -7.5 position.
Second optimisation procedure was to change the time ions are allowed to circulate in the ring before being dumped. The count rate over 5 minutes in detector #0 (top left) at ~20 MeV was used as a gauge. This is the only part of the cycle we can control.
Time (s) Counts
2 148
3 200
4 178 |
Attachment 1: Target-overlap-scan-optimized.pdf
|
|
704
|
Fri May 30 20:06:48 2025 |
JM, CB, NP | Run35 |
21:00
Run 35 started.
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam energy is 2 MeV/u. (beam calc calculation is 1.9211 MeV/u -> may be wrong cooler voltage, need to check grafana)
Target density is about 4e12 at/cm2. FLuctuations between 1e12 and 1e13 at/cm2.
All four detectors positioned fully out and stationary.
Left potentiometer = 18.86 mm
Right potentiometer = 19.8 mm
Ring cycle time is 1 minute. Note we see some hydrogen in in the spectrum, this disapears after a few seconds.
Target T1=30K, T2=31.9K.
Nozzle position x=-3.06, z=1.72 mm
YR09-Etarget pressure = 2.29e-10 mbar.
Cooler set value = 1126V, 15 mA. Read value = 1068V, 13.22 mA
Detector 4 is still a bit unstable in its leakage current but the data coming through looks good. Some crap is periodically written to disk when leakage current spikes. Attachment 1,2 for leakage currents.
Attachment 3,4 data rate to disk and statistics tab for when detector 4 is behaving. When not data rate can spike to 4000 kb/sec. Looks OK at the moment.
Attachment 5 - xy plot. We observe a circular shape on the detector. We are unsure of what this is at the moment. Offline analysis required.
Attachment 6 - energy histogram including Rutherford.
Attachment 7 - energy histogram just nuclear peaks.
Attachment 8 - beam calc with read values. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2025-05-30_21-22-53.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2025-05-30_21-23-16.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2025-05-30_21-23-30.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2025-05-30_21-23-56.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2025-05-30_21-26-17.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2025-05-30_21-35-00.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2025-05-30_21-36-58.png
|
|
Attachment 8: beamCalc-D1.png
|
|
705
|
Fri May 30 20:47:47 2025 |
JM, CB, NP | Run 36 |
21:47
Run 36 started.
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam energy is 2 MeV/u.
Target density is about 1.6e12 at/cm2. FLuctuations between 1e12 and 1e13 at/cm2.
Detectors are now IN with the servo motors only. Detectors are stationary.
Left potentiometer = 36.54 mm
Right potentiometer = 37.96 mm
Ring cycle time is 1 minute. Note we see some hydrogen in in the spectrum, this disapears after a few seconds.
Target T1=30K, T2=31.9K.
Nozzle position x=-3.12, z=1.72 mm
YR09-Etarget pressure = 2.29e-10 mbar.
Cooler set value = 1126V, 15 mA. Read value = 1068V, 13.22 mA
Detector 4 is still a bit unstable in its leakage current but the data coming through looks good. Some crap is periodically written to disk when leakage current spikes.
We will run like this for an hour then move detectors back out for overnight run.
after 1 hour of beamtime we stop.
Attachment 1 - xy plot
Attachment 2 - energy histogram NUCLEAR |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2025-05-30_22-45-48.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2025-05-30_22-46-48.png
|
|
223
|
Tue Feb 22 00:32:35 2022 |
JM, CB, LV, PM, AK | Beam ON, Target ON Run 54 |
01:30
Beam ON ~6E6 pps
Target ON and open to the ring
Target E4 inlet pressure 8.12E-9 mbar
Dump S3 ~ 7E-10 mbar
Nozzle temperature 150 K
1:40
Run 54 started, monitoring code restarted. |
Attachment 1: 2022-02-22_01-38-53-Ex-histogram.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2022-02-22_01-38-17-XYtotal.png
|
|
224
|
Tue Feb 22 02:02:11 2022 |
JM, CB, LV, PM, AK | Beam ON, Target ON Run 54 |
03:00
Beam ON ~7E6 pps
Target ON and open to the ring
Target E4 inlet pressure 8.5E-9 mbar
Dump S3 ~ 7.3E-10 mbar
Nozzle temperature 150 K
Run 54 started, monitoring code restarted. |
Attachment 1: TapeServer2022-02-22_02-49-29.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Leakage_current2022-02-22_02-50-39.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Temperature2022-02-22_02-52-02.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_02-54-34.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Good_events2022-02-22_02-55-14.png
|
|
Attachment 6: AIDA_CorrelationScreenshot_from_2022-02-22_02-56-04.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Spectrum_Browser2022-02-22_02-59-28.png
|
|
Attachment 8: LowEx2022-02-22_03-00-02.png
|
|
Attachment 9: LowEy2022-02-22_03-00-28.png
|
|
Attachment 10: LowEXYTotal2022-02-22_03-01-16.png
|
|
225
|
Tue Feb 22 03:05:06 2022 |
JM, CB, LV, PM, AK | Beam ON, Target ON Run 54 |
04:00
Beam ON ~5.5E6 pps, but it fluctates between 2e6 and 6e6 (like a step function) in about each 5-10min
Target ON and open to the ring
YR09xxx ETarget ~1.8e-10
Target E4 inlet pressure 8.4E-9 mbar
Dump S3 ~ 7.0E-10 mbar
Nozzle temperature 150 K
Run 54 started, monitoring code restarted. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_04-02-25.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_04-03-08.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_04-03-44.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_04-03-24.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_04-04-28.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_04-04-10.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_04-03-55.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_04-10-57.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_04-10-37.png
|
|
226
|
Tue Feb 22 04:09:28 2022 |
JM, CB, LV, PM, AK | Beam ON, Target ON Run 54 - first event at 10MeV ! |
05:00
Beam ON ~2E6 pps, still fluctates between 2e6 and 6e6 (like a step function)
Target ON and open to the ring
YR09xxx ETarget ~1.8e-10
Target E4 inlet pressure 8.3E-9 mbar
Dump S3 ~ 6.8E-10 mbar
Nozzle temperature 150 K
Run 54 started, monitoring code restarted. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-07-47.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-07-33.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-07-19.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-06-58.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-06-30.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-06-19.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-06-06.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-05-40.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-05-30.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-05-11.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_05-04-25.png
|
|
227
|
Tue Feb 22 05:12:38 2022 |
JM, CB, LV, PM, AK | Beam ON, Target ON Run 54 |
06:00
Beam ON ~1.5E6 pps, still fluctates between 1e6 and 6e6 (like a step function)
Target ON and open to the ring
YR09xxx ETarget ~1.8e-10
Target E4 inlet pressure 8.2E-9 mbar
Dump S3 ~ 6.5E-10 mbar
Nozzle temperature 150 K
Run 54 started, monitoring code restarted. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-11-18.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-10-59.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-10-22.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-10-09.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-09-54.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-09-31.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-09-12.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-08-58.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-08-22.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-07-57.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2022-02-22_06-07-46.png
|
|