| ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
728
|
Sun Jun 8 11:55:00 2025 |
EM, PC, JM, CB, EW, AY, CB, PJW, YuL | Run 58,59,60, 61 | 12:52
Started Run 58 - Beam energy
200 keV/u. |
50x | |
727
|
Sun Jun 8 10:05:30 2025 |
EM, PC, JM | Run57 | 11:06
Run during beam change. We will
go down to 200 keV/u |
| |
726
|
Sun Jun 8 09:07:22 2025 |
EM, PC, JM | Run56 | NOTE: RunR55 is missing
Run56: Background run with 250
keV/u. Target off using the usual procedure. |
| |
725
|
Sat Jun 7 10:23:26 2025 |
JM, CB | carme-gsi rebooted | 10:00
The computer screen controlling
the DAQ on carme-gsi appeared to have crashed. |
| |
724
|
Sat Jun 7 10:06:27 2025 |
JM, EM, CB, DB, AY, PC, CB | Run 54 | 11:10
We have started a new run at the
same energy as R53 (250 keV/u) due to an |
50x | |
723
|
Fri Jun 6 17:27:03 2025 |
AY, ST, JM, EM, DB | Run 53 | Run 53 started at 18:25 (started already
earlier but since then data is taken). Everything
is running again. We started at 3E12 at/cm2. |
11x | |
722
|
Fri Jun 6 16:49:59 2025 |
CB, AY, ST | Beam overlap results for 200keV and 250keV | For 200keV the optimal horizontal position
is -5mm.
For 250keV the optimal horizontal |
| |
721
|
Thu Jun 5 16:54:18 2025 |
EW, ST, CB | Run 52 - 0.3 MeV/A | Run 52 started at 17:53. Everything is
running again. We started at 3E12 at/cm2
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam |
14x | |
720
|
Thu Jun 5 08:50:00 2025 |
JM, CF, CB, EW | Run 51 - background | 09:49
DSSD4 has been biased to 100V in
steps of 5V from 60V. It was previously stable |
| |
719
|
Wed Jun 4 10:44:36 2025 |
EW, CB, JM, OF, JG, ST | Run 50 - 0.35 MeV/A | 11:30
Run 50 started.
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam |
13x | |
718
|
Wed Jun 4 00:10:39 2025 |
JM | Run 49 - beam only | 01:10
Gas target turned off via the shutter
valve. |
6x | |
717
|
Tue Jun 3 14:54:29 2025 |
PMH, ST | Run 48 | Run 48 started. Everything is running again.
We started at 3E13 at/cm2
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam |
6x | |
716
|
Tue Jun 3 11:16:07 2025 |
EW, EM, JM | Run 47, beam only background | Run 47 started. Target cooling down after
water cooler failure, beam only background
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam |
| |
715
|
Mon Jun 2 20:03:43 2025 |
JG, AG, CB, EW, EM | Run 45/46, 0.5 MeV/A | Run 45 started.
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam
energy is 0.5 MeV/u. (beam calc calculation |
13x | |
714
|
Mon Jun 2 17:48:07 2025 |
JG, AG | Run 44 scraper tests | Same settings are Run 43 but with coasting
beam and scrapers set to: 30 / - 30
mm. |
| |
713
|
Mon Jun 2 17:25:31 2025 |
JG, AG | Run 43 scraper tests | Same settings are Run 42 but bunched beam
and scrapers set to: 30 / - 30 mm.
|
| |
712
|
Mon Jun 2 16:35:35 2025 |
EW, AG | Run 42 and scraper tests | 17:00
Scraper tests conducted. We tried
moving in the scrapers both at a fixed position |
| |
711
|
Mon Jun 2 09:30:38 2025 |
JM, EW, ST | Run 41 | Run 41 started.
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam
energy is 0.75 MeV/u. (beam calc calculation |
6x | |
710
|
Sun Jun 1 15:33:50 2025 |
EW, JM, CB | Run 40 | 16:30
Run 40 started.
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam |
10x | |
709
|
Sun Jun 1 07:46:34 2025 |
JM, EM, CB | Run 39 | 08:45
Run 39 started.
D+ beam deuterium target. D+ beam |
7x |
|