ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
202
|
Wed Feb 16 21:41:11 2022 |
JM | Run 43 Alpha Background |
22:41
Check Leakage current: (see attachment 1) = 10.01 uA and falling
Check NewMerger tab: (see attachment 2)
Check Tape Server: (see attachment 3) Writing ~2500 kb/s
Check Fee temperatures: all green
Check statistics tab: ADC data items (see attachment 4) -aida3 and aida4 reading zero. Appears to be low noise as stat histogram shows counts as does Ey and Ex low energy histograms
ADC coincidence-info #8 (see attachment 5) aida1,2,5 correlation #8 signals counted. Do not see aida3 correlation 8 signals. was 70-90 previously (elog201)
Good events (see attachment 6) see 10-20k on aida1-4.
Low energy histograms Ex, Ey (attachemnts 7,8)
Noise appears lower across all fees. Aida1 channels for asic 1 and 3 (noisiest) checked against elog 197, same channels are hot but at lower rate to elog 197.
|
Attachment 1: 2022-02-16_22-45-51-Leakage-Current.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2022-02-16_22-43-15-NewMerger.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 2022-02-16_22-43-50-TapeServer.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 2022-02-16_22-49-51-ADC-data-items.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 2022-02-16_22-51-40-AIDA-correlation8.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 2022-02-16_22-48-47-GoodEvents.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 2022-02-16_22-52-51-lowenergyEx.png
|
|
Attachment 8: 2022-02-16_22-57-35-lowenergyEy.png
|
|
529
|
Mon Feb 19 05:10:48 2024 |
TD | Run 42 night shift contd. |
06.03 DAQ continues file G22-86/R42_32
DSSSD bias & leakage current - attachments 1-2
DSSSD #0 trending upwards , DSSSD #1-3 trending downwards with decreasing ambient temperature
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachments 3-4
ADC data item stats - attachment 5
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 6
target density 5.27e+11/cm2
beam stable for last 3 hours ( cannot read scale with X2Go ) |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-03-26.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-03-41.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-04-07.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-05-27.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-05-51.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-06-15.png
|
|
528
|
Sun Feb 18 22:03:56 2024 |
TD | Run 42 night shift |
23.03 DAQ continues file G22-86/R42_21
ML CRYRING ambient temperature and vacuum - attachments 1 & 2
DSSSD bias & leakage current - attachments 3 & 24
DSSSD #0 trending upwards , DSSSD #1-3 trending downwards with decreasing ambient temperature
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachments 4-5
23.07 All system wide checks OK
WR timestamps OK - attachment 6
ADC, DISC, PAUSE and correlation stats OK - attachments 7-10
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 11-12
per FEE64 Stat spectra - attachments 13-14
per FEE64 1.8.L, 1.8.H and 1.8.W 20us FSR spectra - attachments 15-20
Merger, Merger stats and TapeServer OK - attachments 21-23
online analysis spectra - attachments 25-30
23.28 all histograms, stats, Merger stats zero'd
online analysis restarted
23.35 target density 5.83e+11/cm2
beam no change in last 3 hours ( cannot read scale with X2Go )
see attachments 31-33
00.58 DAQ continues file G22-86/R42_24
DSSSD bias & leakage current - attachments 34-35
DSSSD #0 trending upwards , DSSSD #1-3 trending downwards with decreasing ambient temperature
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachments 36-37
ADC data item stats - attachment 38
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 39
target density 5.75e+11/cm2
beam no change in last 3 hours ( cannot read scale with X2Go )
03.14 DAQ continues file G22-86/R42_28
DSSSD bias & leakage current - attachments 40-41
DSSSD #0 trending upwards , DSSSD #1-3 trending downwards with decreasing ambient temperature
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachments 42-43
ADC data item stats - attachment 44
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 45
target density 5.91e+11/cm2
beam decreased in last 3 hours ( cannot read scale with X2Go )
see attachments 46-47
03:30 beam recovered
online analysis rates DSSSD#0 recovered to values observed at start of shift |
Attachment 1: Capture.PNG
|
|
Attachment 2: Capture_2.PNG
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-05-47.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-06-14.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-06-56.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-07-42.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-08-07.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-08-29.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-08-53.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-09-16.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-10-18.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-10-41.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-11-31.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-11-48.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-12-38.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-13-20.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-14-03.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-14-45.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-15-21.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-15-58.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-16-33.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-16-49.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-17-01.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-10.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-26.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-38.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-48.png
|
|
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-59.png
|
|
Attachment 29: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-19-18.png
|
|
Attachment 30: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-19-39.png
|
|
Attachment 31: 20240218_223433.jpg
|
|
Attachment 32: 20240218_223341.jpg
|
|
Attachment 33: 20240218_223509.jpg
|
|
Attachment 34: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-54-56.png
|
|
Attachment 35: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-55-14.png
|
|
Attachment 36: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-55-44.png
|
|
Attachment 37: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-56-14.png
|
|
Attachment 38: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-56-42.png
|
|
Attachment 39: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-57-31.png
|
|
Attachment 40: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-14-25.png
|
|
Attachment 41: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-14-48.png
|
|
Attachment 42: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-15-18.png
|
|
Attachment 43: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-15-43.png
|
|
Attachment 44: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-16-04.png
|
|
Attachment 45: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-16-50.png
|
|
Attachment 46: 20240219_022309.jpg
|
|
Attachment 47: 20240219_022316.jpg
|
|
530
|
Mon Feb 19 06:01:17 2024 |
SHB, JM, JG | Run 42 morning shift |
07:00
Observed reduction in YR09 presure over last few hours in ML online plot. Beam intensity looks OK but target density was fluctuating quite a lot. Current value was 1.5e11.
Changed the nozzle position slightly which increased target density to 5.5e11. Pressure in YR09 looks OK.
I accidently scrolled slightly with the target code (only by 100 but am not sure). Target looks stable but I will not touch remotely again for fear of losing total target position.
Rates in ADC data items statistics and in the monitoring code look consistent with beam on target.
08:56
Target density reduced again to 1.5e11. Changed the nozzle position slightly in X and recovered 5.5e11 at/cm2
Beam intensity looks OK
FEE temps OK
System checks OK
Merger and tape server OK
Statistics ADC data items and spectrum browser rates OK
Merger stats attachement 5
leakage current plot attachment 6
Online monitoring code rates OK
09:33
Run stopped to change beam energy
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-11-42.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-12-02.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-12-27.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-12-47.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-57-23.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-59-08.png
|
|
527
|
Sun Feb 18 13:58:33 2024 |
AR, OF, JM | Run 42 - cooled beam on target |
Run 42 - 15:00
Detectors IN (left arm pot =36.54 mm, right arm pot = 70.49 mm). Stationary. Same as run 40
Electron cooler voltage 751.89 V this corresponds to 1.3444 MeV/u. This should be on the right of the peak of the resonance.
Target density is 5.03e11 at/cm2, ring pressure looks OK YR09 2.36e-10 mbar.
Horizontal beam position is -7.5 mm, vertical beam position is 0.0 mm. Same as run 40.
Beam is in the ring for 4 seconds and total cycle time between injections is 8 seconds. Notice this is the samet as run 40, different to run 35.
Statistics, merger statistics, histograms all zero'd
System wide checks ok. Temperatures ok. Leakage current ok. Merger ok.
Attatchment 1: Stats
Attatchment 2: Temperatures
Attatchments 3-6: Waveforms
Attatchment 7:Leakage current
Attatchment 8: Monitoring code rates
15.35 DSSSD #0 leakage current trending somewhat upwards cf. somewhat downwards for DSSSD #1-3
ML CRYRING hall ambient temprature c. 17.7. deg C and on downward trend.
Probably indicates radiation damage/surface charging of DSSSD #0 - leave DSSSD #0 biased for 24-48h following run and monitor leakage current
15:46
Seeing some beam intensity drops occasionally. Small drop that instantamnously went back up around 15:20 and then stbale beam unitl around 15:44 and then two small-time beam drops within 2 minutes. See attatchment 9. Continuing to monitor. Target density remains stable at 5e11.
16:45
Beam dropping again and continuing to drop (began at 16:35). Target density 4.7e11. Called HKR and they will try to increase the intensity. See attatchment 10.
17:00
System checks ok. Temperatures ok. Leakage current plot okay. Merger ok. Beam intensity still reduced to same amount as in attatchment 10). Target density approx 5e11.
Attatchment 1:1 Stats
Attatchment 12: Temperatures
Attatchments 13-16: Waveforms
Attatchment 17:Leakage current
Attatchment 18: Monitoring code rates
17:10
HKR cryring asked for target to be removed to check intensity. Target was removed.
17:17
Target back in, intensity back to around 2.5e7. Stable. Target desity 5e11.
18:42
All system checks and tempeatures ok. Beam stable. Target 2.3e11.
Leakage current: red line still trending upwards but slowly. See image 24.
10:30
Beam went down about 21:45. Called HKR and they were able to almost immediately restore the beam. Beam intensity ~2.5e7.
Target density 5.6e11 at/cm2, pressure in YR09 ~2.5e-10 mbar.
FEE temps and system check OK
Merger and tape server OK
Merger stats (attachment 25)
All rates in spectrum browser look OK
Monitoring code rates indicate beam on target.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-06-55.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-07-13.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-07-56.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-08-32.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-09-10.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-10-02.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-10-44.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-11-03.png
|
|
Attachment 9: IMG_7922.jpg
|
|
Attachment 10: IMG_7932.jpg
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_16-58-04.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_16-58-17.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_16-59-30.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-00-01.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-00-32.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-00-53.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-01-32.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-01-45.png
|
|
Attachment 19: IMG_7934.jpg
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-42-41.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-43-16.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-43-35.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-43-58.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-44-24.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-44-44.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-44-52.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_22-42-10.png
|
|
595
|
Fri Jun 7 10:05:40 2024 |
CB | Run 41/42/43 - 15N data taking start |
11:05
Confirmed overlap is at 4 mm under new settings.
For unclear reasons, the bottom-left detector is not seeing the halo anymore since around 10:00. Rutherford still visible and if the left arm is moved in the counts at 5 MeV become apparent.
l s by 20 mm, r p in -> 36.5 mm / 64.6 mm
Target thickness 3E11 atoms/cm2. Beam intensity few E7 at injection. Coasting beam mode.
Data rate x10 compared with earlier. Stats as before - the reason is unclear.
Temps & Merger OK. We should be able to tolerate these rates.
Moved detectors in/out to make sure we were not clipping the beam. A few seconds of data may be present in R41_9
11:30
Checkloaded. Detector 2 is now counting more.
Moved to run 42. No other changes.
13:00
Realised cooler voltage was being read via fault g35 divider. Beam stopped
15:00
Switched to F20. Beam back on. Moved to run 43
Electron cooler voltage = 243.155 V
Collector current = 4.29 mA
Beam energy was slightly off, will try again |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_11-08-08.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_11-08-21.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_11-08-57.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_11-09-10.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_11-09-56.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_11-10-05.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_11-11-23.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_11-11-26.png
|
|
200
|
Wed Feb 16 15:27:53 2022 |
EM, JM | Run 41 Pulser tests |
16:30
NOTE: Pulser is ON!
Check Leakage current: (see attachment 1)
Check NewMerger tab: (see attachment 2)
Check Fee temperatures: all green (see attachment 3)
Check statistics tab: ADC data items (see attachment 4)
ADC coincidence-info #8 (see attachment 5)
Good events (see attachment 6)
Check Spectrum Browser tab: (see attachment 7)
Check the following plots: LowEnergyXYRateDSSD0 (see attachment 8)
LowEnergyXYTotalDSSD0 (see attachment 9)
LowEnergyExTotal (see attachment 10)
LowEnergyEyTotal (see attachment 11)
Check system wide checks tab: all okay.
All is good. |
Attachment 1: 2022-02-16_16-05-20_leakagecurrent.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2022-02-16_16-08-00_newmerger.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 2022-02-16_16-09-05_feetemperatures.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 2022-02-16_16-11-10_aida_adc_data.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 2022-02-16_16-12-20_aida01_goodevents.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 2022-02-16_16-13-29_aida01_correlationinfo.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 2022-02-16_16-16-43_spectrumbrowser.png
|
|
Attachment 8: 2022-02-16_16-21-39_lowenergyXYrate.png
|
|
Attachment 9: 2022-02-16_16-23-56_lowenergyXYtotal.png
|
|
Attachment 10: 2022-02-16_16-25-16_lowenergyEytotal.png
|
|
Attachment 11: 2022-02-16_16-25-53_lowenergyExtotal.png
|
|
525
|
Sun Feb 18 07:53:51 2024 |
HW AG | Run 40 Morning Shift |
08:57 Doing morning check. Checked the leakage currents, all ok. Attachment 1
Tempritures of, attchment 2
System wide check, all correct.
Statistics ok, aida 4 was a little high, carlo oked it attachment 3 and 4 (hist)
Spectrum brozer, ok, attachment 5 and 6
Waveforem atachment 7 and 8
Checked merger, spinner spinning...
Attached screenshot of merger 9
11:15 Beam current is around 2.5E7 and the target dencity is 5.3E11 cm2, there was small isntability (dips) from the beam, reason unknown, all detectors stable.
Check leakage current, is stable, attachment 1
Tempreture ok, attachment 2
System wide check, all pass
Statistics checked, attachment 3, aida 4 is still high, histograms attachment 4
Spectrum browser ok, attachment 5 and 6
Waveforms attachment 7 and 8
Checked merger, ok, spinner is spinning,
Attachment 9 is the merger info
12:21 Targer intencity started dropping quite dramatically. The beam position X value was adjusted to -11000, we got back above 4E11 /cm2
13:08 Beam current is around 2.5E7 pretty stable, target is working, 61E11 /cm2, stable
Checked leakage current, stable, attachment 1
Temp. stable, atatchment 2
System wide chack, all pass
Statistics checked, attachemnt 3, aida 4 should be checked, histogram of rates 4 attached
Spectrum browser, attached 5 and 6
Waveform attached 7 and 8
Merger ok, spinner is pinning,
Attached 9 merger info
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_08-58-55.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_09-02-22.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_09-09-25.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_09-11-15.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_09-14-10.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_09-14-41.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_09-15-52.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_09-16-34.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_09-20-35.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_11-17-59.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_11-18-31.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_11-20-03.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_11-21-37.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_11-23-10.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_11-24-12.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_11-24-59.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_11-25-49.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_11-28-06.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-09-43.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-11-14.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-14-48.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-18-19.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-20-35.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-21-01.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-21-26.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-21-54.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-23-21.png
|
|
524
|
Sun Feb 18 00:16:55 2024 |
JM CB | Run 40 - night shift |
01:17
Run 40 continues.
Beam intensity looks OK. Oscillates between just below 2.5e7 and just below 3e7. (attachment 1)
Target density 4.3e11, YR09 pressure 1.54e-10 mbar.
Rates in monitoring code show beam on target.
FEE temperatures all OK - plot over time (attachment 2)
System check OK
Leakage current OK -trending down (attachment 3)
Tape server and merger OK. Merger stats (attachment 4)
ADC data items looks OK, spectrum browser rates OK
Spectrum browser stat (attachment 7 LOG scale) - looks like some HEC were firing previously. Spec browser histograms zero'd to monitor
pn + nn waveforms (attachments 5+6)
Monitoring code energy histograms (attachment 8)
02:40
X2go screen size has decreased further -> cannot see target density but can view beam intensity. Will use ML vac plot to help gauge beam on target
Beam intensity has decreased over the last hour but has now stabilised and is now ~2e7 at injection. Pressure in YR09 has decreased slightly accordingly from ML online but not significantly (still >1e-10 mbar)
Monitoring code rate plots indicate beam on target
All daq checks OK
Will continue to monitor beam intensity
04:14
Ring intensity has increased and appears stable back at 2.5e7.
Target density has slightly decreased to 3e11, ring pressure YR09 stable at 1.5e-10 mbar. I am reluctant to try and move the nozzle while my x2go screen is not 100%.
FEE temps OK
System checks OK
Merger and tape server OK
Rates in all FEEs look OK
Spectrum browser stats (attchment 9) no HEC firing
Monitoring code rates look OK -> beam on target (attachment 10)
05:14
Beam intensity looks OK, Target density 3.11e11. Ring pressure YR09 2e-10 mbar.
All checks OK
Monitoring code rate looks OK -> beam on target
06:20
Beam intensity OK, Target density 3.1e11. Pressure YR09 1.9e-10 mbar.
FEE temps OK
System checks OK
Statistics and rates of all FEEs OK
Merger and Tape server OK
Monitoring code rates look OK -> beam on target
Merger statistics (attachment 11)
7:15
Beam intensity 2E7, target density getting bad 2eE11. WIll fix it from the lab.
FEE temps OK
System checks OK
Merger OK
Stats OK |
Attachment 1: 20240218_011615.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_01-23-04.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_01-25-06.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_01-26-35.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_01-36-02.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_01-36-38.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_01-32-12.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_01-39-29.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_04-18-35.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_04-21-02.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_06-35-40.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_07-12-05.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_07-12-44.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_07-13-08.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_07-13-25.png
|
|
523
|
Sat Feb 17 14:29:03 2024 |
JM, CB, AR, AB | Run 40 - cooled beam on target |
15:27
Run 40 started cooled beam on target
Detectors IN (left arm pot =36.5 mm, right arm pot = 70.49 mm). Stationary. Same as run 35
Electron cooler voltage 751.095 this corresponds to 1.338 MeV/u. This should be on the left of the peak of the resonance.
Target density is 4e11 at/cm2, ring pressure looks OK YR09 1.43e-10 mbar.
Horizontal beam position is -7.5 mm, vertical beam position is 0.0 mm. Same as run 35.
Beam is in the ring for 4 seconds and total cycle time between injections is 8 seconds. Notice this is different than run 35.
Statistics, merger statistics, histograms all zero'd
15:39
System wide checks ok. Merger ok. Temperatures ok.
Attatchment 1: statistics
Attatchment 2: Temperatures
Attatchment 3-6: Waveforms. Layout 2 - (attach 4) had a strnageish waveform for aida11, stays after reload.It was the HEC firing so did an ASIC control and Zero'd histograms and all is okay.
Attatchment 7: Leakage current
17:04
System wide checks ok. Merger ok. Temperatures ok. The beam is on target and everything runs smoothly.
Attatchment 8: statistics
Attatchment 9: Temperatures
Attatchment 10-13: Waveforms. Everything looks ok.
Attatchment 14: Leakage current
18:55
System wide checks ok. Merger ok. Temperatures ok. The beam is on target and everything runs smoothly.
Beam transformer shows a small decrease in beam intensity, not drastic but small slow decrease, see attachment 22. Target density 4e11. Vacuum pressue ok.
Attatchment 15: Statistics
Attatchment 16: Temperatures
Attatchment 17-20: Waveforms
Attatchment 21: Leakage current
19:28
Run40 - Beam dropped intesntiy at 19:17, moved detectors out, called gleb. Beam intensity started increasing again - not sure whats happenig at present (see image 23).
20:26
Around 19:50 beam decreased again and stayed down for a while. Beam not stable. Gleb was called, target turned off, beam restabilied - around 2.5e7 ish. Unsure if it will remain stable during the night (image 24).
20:35
detectors moved back in. Target back in, stable at 4e11.
Potentiometer Left: 36.54 mm
Potentiometer Right: 70.49 mm
Beam stable at the moment (image 25).
System checks 20:40
Base Current Difference
aida03 fault 0x0 : 0x1 : 1
aida04 fault 0x0 : 0x1 : 1
aida05 fault 0x0 : 0x1 : 1
aida06 fault 0x0 : 0x1 : 1
aida07 fault 0x0 : 0x1 : 1
aida08 fault 0xe : 0xf : 1
aida09 fault 0xb : 0xc : 1
aida10 fault 0x0 : 0x1 : 1
aida13 fault 0x0 : 0x1 : 1
aida14 fault 0x0 : 0x1 : 1
FPGA Timestamp error counter test result: Passed 6, Failed 10
If any of these counts are reported as in error
The ASIC readout system has detected a timeslip.
That is the timestamp read from the time FIFO is not younger than the last
System wide checks ok except the FPGA timestamps - see error above - collected them and it went away. Merger ok. Temperatures ok. The beam is on target and everything runs smoothly for now.
Attatchment 26: Temperatures
Attatchment 27-30: Waveforms
Attatchment 31: Leakage current
21:50
FEE temperatures OK
System wide checks OK
Statistics and spectrum browser rate look OK
Merger and tape server OK
Monitoring code rates are consistent with beam on target
X2go seems to not be loading full screen for me - may be my laptop misbehaving?
Can see ring intensity has been stable for the last hour, target density is 4.33e11 and YR09 pressure is 1-2e-10 mbar.
23:22
Target density 4.3e11, beam intensity stable.
Monitoring code rates are consistent with beam on target
Fee temps all OK
System checks OK
Statistics and FEErates OK.
Merger and tape server OK
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_15-39-50.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_15-40-05.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_15-40-49.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_15-43-04.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_15-44-12.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_15-44-36.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_15-45-02.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_16-58-47.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_16-59-18.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_17-00-48.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_17-01-41.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_17-02-26.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_17-03-01.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_17-03-51.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_18-55-13.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_18-55-48.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_18-56-55.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_18-57-26.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_18-57-54.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_18-58-27.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_18-58-44.png
|
|
Attachment 22: IMG_7902.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 23: IMG_7903.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 24: IMG_7906.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 25: IMG_7907.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_20-38-37.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_20-42-41.png
|
|
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_20-43-17.png
|
|
Attachment 29: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_20-43-50.png
|
|
Attachment 30: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_20-55-50.png
|
|
Attachment 31: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_20-45-30.png
|
|
594
|
Thu Jun 6 16:23:10 2024 |
LB CB JM | Run 39 - Run 40 15N |
Started run 39.
We have the 15N+ beam with 426 keV/nucleon. We see a peak in detector top left (mostly) and bottom right, at 4600 keV. We think it is the beam (nominally 6400 keV) after going through silicon dead layer, which however seems to be thicker than expected (expected 0.7 um, but given 1.4 MeV/um energy loss it seems to be > 1 um).
To understand what was going on we first played with detector and beam position.
At 17:28 detectors are fully out, while we are playing with the electron cooler to try to remove this beam halo hitting the detector.
Detector DSSD0 top left periodically seems to get noisier (statistics up to >2E5) and we need to move the detector in and out to go back to normal operations.
------------------
The beam halo in top left detector, as the detector gets moved in, gets elongated in the y direction instead of the x direction, as expected and previosuly observed.
Run 40 started.
18:36
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Attachments 1-4
19:43
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Attachments 5-8
21:15
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Attachments 9-11
00;25
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
-----------------------------------
Movements and observation in xy plot:
- Move right servo in by 20 mm and we see the halo in the top right moving accordingly (attachment 12)
-Move right pneumatic in, saw big increase on bottom right (attachment 13)
-moved beam position down vertical -6 mm and we see reduced beam spot on top left and more on bottom left
-----------------------------------
Beam - target overlap:
We have yet to obtain an overlap
We cannot do this using the beam lifetime as from beam calc the lifetime from the ring is comparable to the lifetime with a target of 1e11 at/cm2
We have tried using Rutherford. However, we will have to move the detectors IN further as the Rutherford peaks at ~3.8 deg.
Possibly we may require other overlap detections from the ring?
I also think the beam requires some optimisation, electron cooler voltage seems to be fluctuating a lot and we see some features on the detectors when moving the beam / detectors as mentioned above.
02:25
The beam intensity has decreased signficantly (by about a factor of five) since about an hour. Operators tried different things, also consulted with Frank Herfurth, but they could not solve the problem.
There is no device which indicates malfunction.
So, during the rest of the night shift we will continue searching for the overlap (of the beam with the target) with the available beam intensity.
03:30
The beam intensity has improved without any aparent intervention.
We have started a new search for the overlap with 20 minute runs per horiznotal beam position.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
03:40
After changing the horizontal beam position from 0 mm to 1 mm, the bottom right detector lost the Rutherford peak and its position spectrum looks to be half empty.
Moving it OUT and IN again did not change the situation.
There is no reason to think that this behavior has been caused by moving the beam by just 1 mm.
04:10
The beam intensity has dropped again without any apparent reason. So, at the moment we can not continue search for the overlap.
The bottom right detector seems to be counting normally again (also without any apparent reason).
06:45
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
07:18
Lost beam again. Gleb is looking for it. Moved right detector out temporarily.
System wide checks as before.
Merger OK, Tape Server OK.
Temperatures OK.
Rates currently OK.
Leakage current decreasing.
10:10
Beam is back. Target is unusually thick at 3-5E11
Checking beam overlap.
Merger & tape server OK.
Temps OK.
Rates OK, a bit higher in 01 and 04. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_18-33-41.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_18-34-15.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_18-34-35.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_18-34-49.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_19-42-49.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_19-42-57.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_19-43-10.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_21-14-02.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_21-14-17.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_21-14-48.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_23-28-29.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_23-42-18.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_07-20-12.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_10-11-17.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-07_10-11-27.png
|
|
593
|
Thu Jun 6 05:44:45 2024 |
DR YL DB LB CB JM | Run 38 - 15N Tests |
06:45
All system checks OK
Target density 3.4e11
11:50
System checks OK.
No beam in the ring yet. Althoug some injection may be taking place at low intensities
Target density appears much more stable than before.
Density currently just above 1e11 at/cm2
Note maintanace is required to appc025 so anydesk is currently down.
13:13
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Attachments 1-5 (also waveforms)
15:00
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics DO NOT looks as before. NOT OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Attachments 6-8
15:16
Notice the statistics for aida01-aida04 (DDSD 0, top left) were counting extremely high in the previous check (attachment 6). Previous rate was 0-1 counts.
We tried ASIC check load three times but not effect on the rate.
We then tried 'shaking the detectors' by moving the left pneumatic in and out again.
Rates go back to normal levels (0-1 counts)
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_13-05-55.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_13-06-24.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_13-07-46.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_13-08-40.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_13-09-03.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_14-59-23.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_14-59-34.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-06_14-59-49.png
|
|
592
|
Wed Jun 5 13:34:02 2024 |
JM | Run 37 - Change in thresholds |
14:20
Target nozzle currently being replaced. No beam
We have decided to switch to 15N beam from now on.
Beam energy for 15N is significantly higher than deuteron beam so we have increased the thresholds (slow comparator) slightly for all detectors to 500 keV (0x32).
ADC data item rates - attachment 1
Run 37 started. Alpha background
Data rate ~ 200 kb/sec
17:44
All system checks OK
20:00
All system checks OK
23:30
All system checks OK
01:25
All system checks OK
03:25
All system checks OK.
Target is stable at 3.5e11, with T1=29 K
05:30
All system checks OK
Target density has slowly drifted down, and is now 1.2e11 |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_14-36-44.png
|
|
591
|
Wed Jun 5 13:21:45 2024 |
JM, CB | Run 36 - pulser walkthrough |
14:00
Access to the cave as Nikos and Andreas have begun work on the target.
Run 36 started - pulser walkthrough.
Pulser amplitudes of 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Attachment 1 - pn channels
Attachment 2 - nn channels
Attachment 3 - pn channels (zoom)
Attachment 4 - nn channels (zoom)
Best pn channel looks like AIDA09 - pulser width 63
Worst pn channel looks like AIDA14 - pulser width 148
Best nn channel looks like AIDA12 - pulser width 58
Worst nn channel looks like AIDA16 - pulser width 246
This is approximately the same as pulser widths before the beam time. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_14-20-18.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_14-21-26.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_14-27-43.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_14-25-44.png
|
|
520
|
Fri Feb 16 22:03:27 2024 |
TD | Run 35 - night shift |
22.51 DAQ continues file G22-86/R35_36
DSSSD bias OK - attachments 1-2
FEE64 temperatures - attachments 3-4
CRYRING hall ambient temperature 20
FEE64 temps tracking ambient temperature - aida01, aida03, aida09 and aida15 - all ( just ) over 65 deg C
All system wide checks OK
WR timestamps OK - attachment 5
ADC, DISC and PAUSE data item stats - attachments 6-8
hot channels aida01 ( 91k ), aida04 ( 12k ), aida15 ( 11k )
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 9-10
aida04 & aida13 only FEE64s with significant rates and systematic rate variation with channel #
per FEE64 1.8.L, 1.8.H and 1.8.W 20us FSR spectra - attachments 11-16
Merger, Merger stats and TapeServer OK - attachments 17-19
23.16 All histograms, stats and merger stats zero'd
Online analysis spectra - attachments 21-26
only the inner quadrants of the 4x DSSSDs are correctly mapped - attachment 21
observe double peak structure in DSSSD0 rate spectra - radiation damage most forward lab angle strips? - attachment 24
23.23 restart online analysis - zero spectra
23.30 YR12DTIC 2.5e7/s
YR09 vacuum 7e-11 - 1.2e-10 mbar
density 4e11/cm2
See attachments 27-34
01.30 DAQ continues file G22-86/R35_39
FEE64 temperatures - attachments 35-36
ADC data item stats - attachment 37
DSSSD leakage currents - attachment 38
YR12DTIC 2.5e7/s
YR09 vacuum 7e-11 - 1.2e-10 mbar
density 4.1e11/cm2
03.05 YR12DTIC 2.2e7/s
YR09 vacuum 7e-11 - 1.2e-10 mbar
density 3.5e11/cm2
DAQ continues file G22-86/R35_42
DSSSD leakage currents - attachment 39
FEE64 temperatures - attachments 40-41
ADC data item stats - attachment 42
05.05 DAQ continues file G22-86/R35_47
YR12DTIC 2.5e7/s
density 3.8e11/cm2
DAQ continues file G22-86/R35_42
DSSSD leakage currents - attachment 43
FEE64 temperatures - attachments 44-45
ADC data item stats - attachment 46
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 47-48
aida12 asic #1 and # 2 HEC activity
and following Check ASIC load aida12
ADC data item stats - attachment 49
Shift Summary
Beam, target density and vacuum appear to have been stable overnight
FEE64 temperatures continue to cycle
Evidence of some radiation damage DSSSDD 0 presumably for most forward lab angle strips?
aida12 asic #1 and #2 high rate HEC activity - fixed by ASIC check load |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-51-27.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-52-15.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-53-02.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-54-10.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-55-11.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-55-38.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-55-55.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-56-24.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-57-14.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-57-37.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-58-23.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-59-08.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_22-59-46.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-00-33.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-01-18.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-01-59.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-02-21.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-02-36.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-02-48.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Capture.PNG
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-18-08.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-18-22.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-18-34.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-19-00.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-19-13.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_23-19-26.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Capture.PNG
|
|
Attachment 28: 20240216_222850.jpg
|
|
Attachment 29: 20240216_222907.jpg
|
|
Attachment 30: 20240216_222736.jpg
|
|
Attachment 31: 20240216_222950.jpg
|
|
Attachment 32: 20240216_222747.jpg
|
|
Attachment 33: 20240216_222928.jpg
|
|
Attachment 34: 20240216_222941.jpg
|
|
Attachment 35: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_01-24-57.png
|
|
Attachment 36: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_01-26-57.png
|
|
Attachment 37: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_01-27-34.png
|
|
Attachment 38: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_01-29-05.png
|
|
Attachment 39: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_03-07-38.png
|
|
Attachment 40: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_03-08-05.png
|
|
Attachment 41: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_03-08-57.png
|
|
Attachment 42: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_03-09-26.png
|
|
Attachment 43: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_05-06-46.png
|
|
Attachment 44: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_05-07-11.png
|
|
Attachment 45: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_05-08-19.png
|
|
Attachment 46: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_05-09-42.png
|
|
Attachment 47: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_05-11-03.png
|
|
Attachment 48: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_05-11-27.png
|
|
Attachment 49: Capture.PNG
|
|
519
|
Fri Feb 16 10:02:41 2024 |
JM, OF, CB, AR, EM | Run 35 - cooled beam on target |
11:01
Run 35 started cooled beam on target
Detectors IN (left arm pot =36.5 mm, right arm pot = 70.49 mm)
Electron cooler voltage 751.4 this corresponds to 1.3436 MeV/u. This should be on the peak of the resonance.
Target density is 3.75e11 at/cm2, ring pressure looks OK YR09 1.43e-10 mbar.
Horizontal beam position is -7.5 mm, vertical beam position is 0.0 mm. Same as run 33.
Beam is in the ring for 8 seconds and total cycle time between injections is 12 seconds. Same as run 33
Beam injection looks stable. ~2e7 injected and no missed injections so far.
Merger OK, Tape server OK
Merger statistics zero'd
All histograms and statistics zero'd, monitoring code reset.
ADC data item statistics looks as before, very few counts until injection into the ring. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current trending upwards, same as previous elog.
13:33
FEE temperatures OK - all FEEs at least 1.5C below vertex warning
ADC data items statistics OK
Merger and Tape server OK
Target density 3.8e11 at/cm2, ring pressure stable.
Ring injections look very stable
Leakage current now decreasing (attachment 1)
Monitoring code xy and energy histograms (attachment 2+3)
15:03
System wide checks ok. Merger ok. Temperatures ok.
Attatchment 4: Stats
Attatchment 5: Temperatures
Attatchments 6-9: Waveforms.
Attatchment 10: Leakage current
Attatchment 11: lowenergyEytotal plots
17:09
System wide check ok. Merger ok. Temperature ok.
Attachment 12: Stats
Attachment 13: Temperatures
Attachment 14-18: Waveforms (Layout 7: strange behaviour in aida01, went to ASIC Control and did "Check ASIC control" three times, which resolved the problem)
Attachment 19: Leakage current
Attachment 20: lowenergyEytotal plots
Gas pressure was going up a little bit: changed Y position of the nozzle from 1000 to 950.
17:55
The gas jet target pressure started to fall sharply at 17:34 and went down to zero within 2 minutes.
It came back while it we were changing the nozzle position but at 17:49 fell to zero again.
Currently waiting for Nikos to came and have look at it.
18:10
Target back in place and has a density of 4.04e11. Beam transformer looks similar to pre plummeting target density.
18.55 Check ASIC load FEE64 aida16 asic#3 HEC channels active
Following check load merger rate decreased significantly.
19:14
Gas density remains stable around 4e11 after the incident at 17:34 and the beam transformer singal looks ok too. Gas pressure ok.
Merger: All aidas turn green but the merger has decreased significantly (too about 306 000 items/sec) as mentioned above.
System wide check ok. Temperature ok.
Attachment 21: Stats
Attachment 22: Temperatures
Attachment 23-26: Waveforms
Attachment 27: Leakage current
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_13-44-25.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_13-46-26.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_13-46-52.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_14-56-20.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_14-56-38.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_14-58-01.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_14-58-31.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_14-59-59.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_15-00-11.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_15-00-54.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_15-02-24.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_16-54-55.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_16-55-17.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_16-56-23.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_16-57-08.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_16-58-01.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_17-04-41.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_17-06-07.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_17-08-45.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_17-20-51.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_19-10-26.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_19-10-39.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_19-11-56.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_19-12-21.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_19-12-50.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_19-13-32.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-02-16_19-14-12.png
|
|
521
|
Sat Feb 17 06:19:27 2024 |
JM, CB | Run 35 - contd |
07:10
FEE temperatures OK
System checks OK
Merger and tape server OK
Statistics look OK,
Rates in the detectors from the mointoring code indicate we have beam on target.
Detector leakge current appears to be following same pattern as yesterday -> temperature (attachment 1)
Merger stats (attachment 2) - quite a few more pause / resume statements than normal - noise last night?
Target density appears stable over the last 3 hours ~3.8e11 at/cm2, ring pressure stable YR09 ~1.5e-10 mbar
Beam injection looks stable over the last few hours.
09:08
FEE temperatures OK -aida03 and aida09 0.5 C over 65C warning.
system checks OK
ADC data item stats OK
Spectrum browser rate (attachment 3)
Merger and Tape server OK
Monitoring xy and energy histograms since zero'd last night (attachments 4+5)
Target density slight drop to ~3.5e11 at/cm2. Pressure in the ring stable. CB attempting to optimise target density and ring pressure.
Beam injection into the ring still good
11:04
FEE temperatures OK
System checks OK
ADC data items and spectrum browser rates OK
Target density ~4.6e11 at/cm2, ring pressure looks OK ~1e-10 mbar
Beam injection still good.
Merger and tape server OK
12:45
Beam injection over last 2 hours has been stable
Target density 4.75e11 and stable. ring pressures are stable.
FEE temperatures OK
System checks OK
ADC data items stats and spectrum browser rates look OK
Merger and tape server OK
14:01
We wish to test the beam ahlo on injection so are ending run
Run stopped. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_07-20-01.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_07-21-27.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_09-09-35.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_09-13-44.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-17_09-14-35.png
|
|
588
|
Tue Jun 4 18:08:04 2024 |
Boudefla Dounia - CB - LB - SD | Run 34 |
19:08
Beam energy = 3 MeV.
Horizontal beam position = 4.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Target density ~ fluctuating
Beam intensity at inj ~ 1.7e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm = 64.60 mm
MBS signals saved from motors code
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 6 minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.36e-11 mbar.
Merger error recovered
White rabbit time stamps
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
21:27
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
23:00
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Statistics attachment 5
Merger attachment 6
00:42
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Density is oscillating between E10 and low E11.
attachment 7 is statistics, attachment 8 is temperature, attachment 9 is merger, attachment 10 is spectrum browser.
02:20
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Density is oscillating between E10 and low E11. ( last 15 minutes below 2E10)
attachment 11 -13
From 2:00 target density falls below 2E10 and started decreasing to the E9 range. At 2:40 we started playing with x-y to get to higher density. At 3:30 we are at 5/6E10 and waiting to see if it stabilizesto that or if it needs more playing.
04:06
Target density being 1-2E11 since 5 minutes
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Attachment 14 statistics, attachment 15 merger
05;53
Target density 1E10, sometimes e11, before going down to low E10 and we need to play a bit with x-y to recover it
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Attachment 16-18
07:35
Target density 2.5E11, after changiny y position to 1000
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
09:00
Target density has not improved despite efforts last night. Mid 10 - low 11 density range. We have asked HKR to remove beam from the ring and allow access so Nikos can change the nozzle.
Beam off now, access granted. Will begin warming nozzle. Internal cave work on changing nozzle expected to start at 11
Run stopped.
Final monitoring code histogram attached
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_19-07-40.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_19-11-14.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_21-26-45.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_21-26-50.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_22-40-39.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_22-43-21.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_00-44-49.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_00-45-21.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_00-45-41.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_00-47-33.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_02-21-37.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_02-22-15.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_02-22-44.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_04-06-59.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_04-07-43.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_05-55-15.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_05-55-49.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_05-56-34.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-06-05_09-04-45.png
|
|
587
|
Tue Jun 4 15:25:36 2024 |
BD US CB | Run 33 |
16:26
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
Nicos came in to optimize target density.
18:39
aida02 in the MERGER aka aida03 elsewhere has a red background, but still appears to be transferring data. Rates are fine. Temps are fine. System wide checks unchanged.
See attachments. Checkloaded x2 - no difference. Unclear what the issue is. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_18-33-23.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_18-33-38.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_18-35-26.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-06-04_18-36-55.png
|
|
586
|
Tue Jun 4 14:13:17 2024 |
JM, CB, DB, US | Run 32- beam only background |
15:15
Run 32 started - Beam, no target
Beam energy = 3 MeV.
Horizontal beam position = 4.0 mm, vertical beam position = 0.0 mm.
Beam intensity at inj ~ 2.5e7
Detectors are positioned IN. Left arm = 36.54, right arm = 64.60 mm
Histograms and stats zero'd, monitoring code restarted.
Beam in the ring ~ 5 minutes.
Pressure in YR09 E target ~ 4.5e-11 mbar.
Motors code crashed. Beam removed from ring to re-home detectors.
15:20
Beam in the ring again, detectors homed, no target
Detectors have been set up to send signals on injection / dump
15:35
Merger OK, Tape server OK
ADC data item statistics looks as before. OK
FEE temperatures look OK
System checks OK
Leakage current stable
|