Analysis done by JEL of the AIDA daq with his own time-stitcher -- not the standard one used by DESPEC.

- Analysis of 168Dy:

-- Correlation efficiency and stopping layer of ion 168Dy in fully-stripped and hydrogen-like charge-state.

JB has removed unnecessary cables and items from the snout and platform:

- the bPlast cables and booster boards were removed

- crate below the AIDA frame was disconnected from the power supply

- BB7 cables were removed

- power supply for the booster boards was removed

We switch on the system and check the noise conditions.

We started up. BIAS OK. TEMPS OK.

Thresholds initially set to 100 keV.

Rates in all FEEs are > 200 kHZ. Attachment 6.

We then checked the pulser peak widths in aida14. --> 192 channels with 1 V 1x attenuation. at 700 keV threshold (attachment 3). At 100 keV threshold the peak width was significantly higher!!! ---> 385 channels (attachment 2)

We checked the rates in the FEEs with the 700 keV thresholds (attachment 11).

Furthermore, we checked the constant noise that appears to be present in the y FEEs aida02,04,06,08. This can be seen in attachment 8 and has been noted in previous elogs https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/DESPEC/727

Info on current status of ion catcher: vacuum system is ON, electronics is also on (RF ~2MHz) on the side opposite to the DESPEC setup

13:30 We are going to do the pulser walkthrough for the the source tests.

We are wrapping the snout in some copper first to further establish a better connection with the ground.

2025Nov07-13.55.01 is a setting with 100 keV threshold across all FEEs.

We got the DAQ running, TEMPS ok and biased OK. We execute the pulser walkthrough as follow:

10x attenuation - 10V -> 1V in steps of 1 V

/lustre/despec/aida_sourcetest_2025/raw/

pulser_wt_10V - 10V

pulser_wt_9V - 9V

pulser_wt_8V - 8V

pulser_wt_7V - 7V

pulser wt_6V - 6V

pulser_wt_5V - 5V

pulser_wt_4V - 4V

pulser_wt_3V - 3V

pulser_wt_2V - 2V

pulser_wt_1V - 1V

Data taking stopped and we turn off the system to a safe state.

Initial analysis of the raw ADC spectra can be seen in attachment 4 & 5.

DAQ stopped at ~17.30 due to anydesk failure


> Restart AIDA
> 
> aida06 took three attempts to boot today :(
> 
> All system checks OK, ASICs aligned
> 
> Run DAQ without merger - looks okay, all FEEs working
> 
> When connecting to merger aida15 drops connection, solution restart merger
> 
> Aida13 not sending data - do an ASIC check/load
> 
> Finally all DAQs send data, merger is happy with all 16 FEEs
> 
> Open run R6 on disk

Restart AIDA

aida06 took three attempts to boot today :(

All system checks OK, ASICs aligned

Run DAQ without merger - looks okay, all FEEs working

When connecting to merger aida15 drops connection, solution restart merger

Aida13 not sending data - do an ASIC check/load

Finally all DAQs send data, merger is happy with all 16 FEEs

Open run R6 on disk

14:10 started up the DAQ. HV and TEMPS OK.

Peak threshold with 1V pulser measured at ~ 175 ADC channels. Attachment 3.

14:24 DAQ stopped and detector debiased. We are going to do the following:

1. Cover the snout with a black cloth to check if it is light tight!
2. Disconnect the detector signal cable from the FEE64 adaptor card of aida14.

We put a black cloth cover over the snout, but pulser peak width remained the same ~161 ADC channel. Attachment 4,5.

We disconnected the cable from aida14 and the FWHM pf the pulser is ~15 ADC channels (as expected)

Wrapped the snout with more copper tape at the point where the PCB ground makes contact with the snout to ensure better contact, this seems to improve the FWHM to ~95 ADC channels

Anydesk has crashed. I am not able to set it up again. I switch off bias and fees

Some FEES were not acquiring data for some reason we could not understand. We lowered the thresholds to 200 keV, then rose them again to 700 keV. It seems they are now acquiring. We start data taking again.

- Bias and basic checks: the pulser FWHM appears to be ~170, which is the same we have obtained at the end of last week.

- Initialised the Merger and Tape server

- loading of settings: EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2025Nov03-16.21.44

- slow comparator thresholds set to 700 keV for all X FEES

- y FEEs disabled in the discriminator

- Starting data taking with following details:

MIDAS data in: Bi207Centre_700

MBS data in /lustre/despec/aida_sourcetest_2025/raw started from lxg3138 on screen ('AIDAdaq')

We take data overnight in this configuration and continue the grounding checks tomorrow

Data taking and DAQ stopped now (17.40)

- Initialised the Merger and Tape server

- loading of settings: EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2025Oct29-16.11.06

- aida16 very noisy (attachments 3,4), slow comparator thresholds was risen to 500 keV, until reducing its deadtime to 0

- y FEEs disabled in the discriminator (example in attachment 5)

- Starting data taking with following details:

MIDAS data in: Bi207Centre

MBS data in /lustre/despec/aida_sourcetest_2025/raw started from lxg3138 on screen ('AIDAdaq')

15:10 MP entered and check the water pressure OK.
15:10 DSSSDs biased - OK.

The plan from https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/DESPEC/719


- Energy distribution in x and y for ADC items and cluster
- The cluster size from conversion electrons
- ADC offsets with the 207Bi source after performing a pulser walkthrough
- Threshold test /w a 207Bi source - varying the threshold as while the source is in place and seeing when the 207Bi peaks are cut off. 
- Background run without the 207Bi source (after the above tests)
- Possible test with a 152Eu source as well to measure conversion electrons from Eu could also be an option but we would need to discuss how to do this since all the 152Eu source are closed. We could possibly measure the compton edge from this 
data.

Currently the n+n ohmic channels are too noisy to be used for the test. So we will disable their readout for the data taking.

All system wide checks passed. ADC calibration not (but we don't care since we aren't looking at waveforms... for now...).

TEMPS OK. Attachment 2.

We loaded the settings from 2025Oct28-14.55.15 which has blanket thresholds of 0x64 (1 MeV) for all the ASICs.
 
The pulser peaks seem to have gotten wider since yesterday (75 channels). We have now measured a peak width of 167 channels in aida14 (!) (attachment 3). This was only after tightening the grounding of the setup and disabling the y FEEs. Rates in the ohmic FEEs appear to have decreased by a whole order of magnitude excl. aida02 (see attachment 4).

Currently, we have the ohmic FEE64s disabled aida02,04,06,08, in the discriminator channel mask value set 0x0 ---> 0xfffffff.

15:47 We lower the thresholds to 200 keV (2025Oct29-09.55.31)to see how the system responds and what the rates are. 

15:54 We see a 207Bi spectrum cleanly ontop of the FEE64s over which the source is place (aida01,aida14,aida03,aida07). Attachment 6. (For comparison the 207Bi spectrum obtained by Oscar Hall in the AIDA NIM paper Attachment 7).

- A quick observation is that the low energy peak around 400 keV is slightly cut off in some of the FEEs (this could suggest that the operating threshold might be slightly different in some of the FEEs).

16:00 Setting up the merger. EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2025Oct29-16.11.06 setting made for the discriminators mask setting for the y FEEs disabled.

To the reader of this elog: By now it has taken over an hour to start up the DAQ... We give up and will try tomorrow morning

The cables form the AIDA FEE64 adaptor PCB to the MSL type BB18 DSSSDs are constructed as follows

Per FEE64

2x Samtec FFSD-17-D-xx-01-N-SR where xx is the cable length in inches
   along length if ribbon cable Al-plated copper braid drain wire with crimped eyelets to be connected to AIDA FEE64 adaptor PCB 
   ribbon cables completely wrapped by inner layer of 3M 1245 copper tape (https://docs.rs-online.com/55e0/0900766b814784d5.pdf) and outer layer of 3M 5413 polyimide tape 
(https://docs.rs-online.com/2bce/A700000007254120.pdf)

1x Kapton PCB 15cm length, no screen 
   transitions from FFSD cables to DSSSD Samtec connectors, minimal additional material in volume around DSSSDs

AnyDesk was updated to the latest version that supports CentOS 7 (EOL OS)

First the YUM repositories were migrated, as the original address was offline due to EOL

# mv yum.repos.d yum.repos.d_old
# git clone https://github.com/tkne/centos-7-repo.git yum.repos.d

The OS was updated and a needed package was installed:

# yum update-minimal
# yum install gtkglext-libs

Finally AnyDesk was downloaded:

# https_proxy=http://proxy.gsi.de:3128 wget https://download.anydesk.com/linux/anydesk-6.3.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
# yum install anydesk-6.3.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm

Note that later versions (such anydesk 6.4 or 7.0) refuse to install as CentOS 7 has too old a GLIBC
The only "fix" I observe is upgrading to a supported edition such as AlmaLinux (as used by CERN)
This would need to be coordinated with STFC 

Remember that 'ADC calibration' refers to the setup of the fast serial output of the AD9222 Octal, 50MSPS, 14 bit ADC which generates the waveforms - if the FEE64 is unable to calibrate all that happens is that you will not be able to see preamp output waveforms. Energy spectra will work regardless as they use a different ADC.

Inspection of side FEEs (2,6,4,8) and possible grounding improvements:

- all screws and nuts for copper connections were tightenedFee

- FEE 6 was isolated from the copper connection grounding FEE2 with insulating tape (attachment 1)

- A piece of tape was found below FEE6 (attachments 2,3) --> shall this be removed?

Bias and power on of FEES, preparation of two settings with lower thresholds:

- note: cannot calibrate ADC of aida15 even after trying multiple times (?)

- 500-keV thresholds settings saved as EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2025Oct29-09.49.01

- 200-keV thresholds settings saved as EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2025Oct29-09.55.31

- Ch 2 and 3 of CAEN HV module changed to negative polarity, Ch 0,1 still with positive polarity
- Bias changed from the n+n to the p+n side (now Ch 2,3) - att. 1

- EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2025Oct28-14.55.15 -> Slow comparitor -> 0x64 (1MeV) p+n Pos. bias & n+n Neg. bias

- Attachment 7: aida01 had its threshold lowered to 500 keV -> Rate increased from 500 to 6500 Hz
- Pulser inputs plugged in.


We have input a 1V pulser input into the data and have measured a peak in aida01 with a FWHM = 75 channel see attachment 9 and a FWHM in aida 14 (DSSD2) of also 76 channels which is similar to the results obtained in June from Nabil.


We cannot see anything from the n+n side as the signals are too noisy. Probably best to go with a higher trigger rate on the pulser and check with log scale tomorrow. It might also be worth checking the grounding on the y-strips as the problem with biasing with positive polarity is still seen in aida02 and aida04 (high noise repetition0 signal, attachment 2).

Conclusion is that we have reproduced in part the result from Nabil.

Tomorrow we will continue with the tests by lowering the thresholds and hopefully collect some data :-)

19.06 Found HV OFF, DAQ GOing

      DAQ STOP
      FEE64 power OFF


> 12:55 We are going to try the follow changes to the AIDA scheme of 241012025.
> 
> - Fitting LK1 (aida01, aida14), removing LK1 (aida03, aida07, aida11, aida15) - only 1x LK1 needs to be fitted per Si wafer
> - Removing LK4 to see what (if anything) changes.
> 
> Check that all of the screws securing the copper foil to ground are tight - snout install/removal tends to loosen screws.
> 
> - Remove the bias line between aidas 12-3-15 and aidas 16-7-11
> - Remove the test circuit
>  (These two should eliminate any extra ground path on the front, except via the DSSD)
> 
> - Use a multimeter to confirm 0 Ohm between all the copper foils  (short the two probes to correct for resistance of the probe leads)
> 
> - Try combinations of LK2/LK4 on the n+n fees
> 
> 13:01 We check first the grounding with a multimeter and the different copper grounding components. They should all be grounded to the large iron frame, which is in 
turn grounded to the platform. We also checked that the CAEN HV PSU was also grounded to the platform (it is).
> 
> 13:22 We removed the LK on aida03, aida07, aida11, aida15 and added LK1 to aida01 and aida14. We try starting the DAQ and seeing the response from these changes.
> 
> 13:25 We tried biasing with this configuration and the first DSSD on HV01 read a leakage current of 40 uA (too high). So we biased it down and reassessed. 
> 
> 13:30 It turns out we had LK1 fitted to aida04. We tried biasing again but this time DSSSD on HV01 tripped. They are fitted with LK4 so we biased down and removed 
these link on aida06 and aida08.
> 
> 13:35 Trying to bias now with LK4 removed from aida06 and aida08. We tried fitting and removing again. Now the setup appears to bias. This was probably due to a stray 
piece of copper shielding touching the PCB.
> 
> 14:22 We are checking the noise conditions now. TEMPS OK. FADC Align and whiterabbit timestamps OK.
> 
> 14:30 With the changes above we have noticed an intense 5/2 ms pulsed signal in the wave forms. See attachment 2
> 
> 15:20 We decabled everything and the current scheme from 24102025, see prev. elog entry is in attachment 1.
> 
> 15:34 We have unbiased AIDA1 and the wave forms improve for AIDA2 (?), 5/2 ms pulsed signal is still observed in AIDA1

12:55 We are going to try the follow changes to the AIDA scheme of 241012025.

- Fitting LK1 (aida01, aida14), removing LK1 (aida03, aida07, aida11, aida15) - only 1x LK1 needs to be fitted per Si wafer
- Removing LK4 to see what (if anything) changes.

Check that all of the screws securing the copper foil to ground are tight - snout install/removal tends to loosen screws.

- Remove the bias line between aidas 12-3-15 and aidas 16-7-11
- Remove the test circuit
 (These two should eliminate any extra ground path on the front, except via the DSSD)

- Use a multimeter to confirm 0 Ohm between all the copper foils  (short the two probes to correct for resistance of the probe leads)

- Try combinations of LK2/LK4 on the n+n fees

13:01 We check first the grounding with a multimeter and the different copper grounding components. They should all be grounded to the large iron frame, which is in turn grounded to the platform. We also checked that the CAEN HV PSU was also grounded to the platform (it is).

13:22 We removed the LK on aida03, aida07, aida11, aida15 and added LK1 to aida01 and aida14. We try starting the DAQ and seeing the response from these changes.

13:25 We tried biasing with this configuration and the first DSSD on HV01 read a leakage current of 40 uA (too high). So we biased it down and reassessed. 

13:30 It turns out we had LK1 fitted to aida04. We tried biasing again but this time DSSSD on HV01 tripped. They are fitted with LK4 so we biased down and removed these link on aida06 and aida08.

13:35 Trying to bias now with LK4 removed from aida06 and aida08. We tried fitting and removing again. Now the setup appears to bias. This was probably due to a stray piece of copper shielding touching the PCB.

14:22 We are checking the noise conditions now. TEMPS OK. FADC Align and whiterabbit timestamps OK.

14:30 With the changes above we have noticed an intense 5/2 ms pulsed signal in the wave forms. See attachment 2

15:20 We decabled everything and the current scheme from 24102025, see prev. elog entry is in attachment 1.

15:34 We have unbiased AIDA1 and the wave forms improve for AIDA2 (?), 5/2 ms pulsed signal is still observed in AIDA1

tcsh
cd /MIDAS/DB/EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/<ASIC settings DB key>
foreach f (`ls`)
echo $
cat "$f"/CONTENTS | grep .<ASIC parameter #>

Example 

ASIC settings DB key = /MIDAS/DB/EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2025Feb24-17.14.52
ASIC slow comparator parameter = 12

[npg@aidas-gsi 2025Feb24-17.14.52]$ tcsh
[npg@aidas-gsi 2025Feb24-17.14.52]$ cd /MIDAS/DB/EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2025Feb24-17.14.52
[npg@aidas-gsi 2025Feb24-17.14.52]$ foreach f (`ls`)
foreach? echo $f
foreach? cat "$f"/CONTENTS | grep .12
foreach? end
aida01
ASIC.3.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.1.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.4.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.2.12 string 0x0a
aida02
ASIC.3.12 string 0x0f
ASIC.1.12 string 0x0f
ASIC.4.12 string 0x0f
ASIC.2.12 string 0x0f
aida03
ASIC.3.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.1.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.4.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.2.12 string 0x0a
aida04
ASIC.3.12 string 0x0f
ASIC.1.12 string 0x0f
ASIC.4.12 string 0x0f
ASIC.2.12 string 0x0f
aida05
ASIC.3.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.1.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.4.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.2.12 string 0x0a
aida06
ASIC.3.12 string 0xff
ASIC.1.12 string 0xff
ASIC.4.12 string 0xff
ASIC.2.12 string 0xff
aida07
ASIC.3.12 string 0xff
ASIC.1.12 string 0xff
ASIC.4.12 string 0xff
ASIC.2.12 string 0xff
aida08
ASIC.3.12 string 0xff
ASIC.1.12 string 0xff
ASIC.4.12 string 0xff
ASIC.2.12 string 0xff
aida09
ASIC.3.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.1.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.4.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.2.12 string 0x0a
aida10
ASIC.3.12 string 0x0f
ASIC.1.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.4.12 string 0x0f
ASIC.2.12 string 0x0a
aida11
ASIC.3.12 string 0xff
ASIC.1.12 string 0xff
ASIC.4.12 string 0xff
ASIC.2.12 string 0xff
aida12
ASIC.3.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.1.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.4.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.2.12 string 0x0a
aida13
ASIC.3.12 string 0xff
ASIC.1.12 string 0xff
ASIC.4.12 string 0xff
ASIC.2.12 string 0xff
aida14
ASIC.3.12 string 0xff
ASIC.1.12 string 0xff
ASIC.4.12 string 0xff
ASIC.2.12 string 0xff
aida15
ASIC.3.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.1.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.4.12 string 0x0a
ASIC.2.12 string 0x0a
aida16
ASIC.3.12 string 0xff
ASIC.1.12 string 0xff
ASIC.4.12 string 0xff
ASIC.2.12 string 0xff
CONTENTS
cat: CONTENTS/CONTENTS: Not a directory

Recommend saving (and recording ASIC settings DB key) with specific slow comparator settings which can be subsequently restored.
For example

- slow comparator p+n FEE64s 0xa, n+n FEE64s 0xf
- all slow comparators 0x64 
  etc

> > > 
> > > We have dismounted the AIDA stack and bPlast and realigned the cables so that they can fit into the adapters.
> > > 
> > > The plan for the next couple days is the following:
> > > 
> > > - Alignment -- done
> > > - Remount cable -- done
> > > - Fix position w/o bPlast mounted -- done
> > > - Remount bracket for the last stage -- done
> > > - Remount AIDA 1 & 2 and the 207Bi source with the source holder -- done
> > > - Mount the snout and take data -- we wait till next week Monday when the heat exchanger is active again. (ongoing)
> > > 
> > > The current setup at the end of work is that the snout is mount with a bPlast (uncabled) and 2 AIDA layers at the regular spaced position with a 207Bi source down stream, as can be seen in the previous elog. The source is ~1 cm away from the middle AIDA wafer.
> > > 
> > > Currently what is cabled:
> > > 
> > > - Signal out from the detector
> > > - Bias daisy chain
> > > 
> > > Still to be cabled:
> > > 
> > > - HV cable
> > > - Grounding
> > > - Pulser
> > > 
> > > Additional info on the source position:
> > > - the source is at ~9.6 mm distance from the downstream detector
> > > - the source is placed at the centre of the middle wafer: 12.25 cm in x, 4.75 cm in y
> > > - the radius of the source is ~1.5 mm
> > 
> > The Messhuette has been cleaned and equipment has been rearranged. If there are any broken or missing components be sure to follow up with the FRS group (as I believe they have been cleaning here).
> > 
> > We are resuming the work on the source measurements as the cooling water is back. Some of the valves still look closed so we are investigating if the water is flowing to the setup.
> > 
> > 14:31 Temperature on start up OK - attachment 2.
> > 
> > 15:41 We reset the ASIC control registers to a setup used in Feb 2024 (2025Feb24-17.14.52) to match the full AIDA setup (it was using BB7 initially in aida10).
> > 
> > The old bias scheme is obsolete and the bias is now done via the Ohmic side.
> > 
> > 16:47 We have look at some initial spectra with the 207Bi 3-8 shows the ADC channels and waveforms of the n+n and p+n sides. Bias and grounding developed by Nabiel have been done.
> > 
> > We are going to wait for the system to stabilise over night so that we start taking data tomorrow. Then we can analyse the results and see what we get :) Some channels are clearly broken which can be seen in the waveforms eg. aida16.
> 
> 11:31 The detector was turned off last night to put it into a safe state. We return to make some comparison of the noise w.r.t the tests performed by Nabil and co. 
> 
> email snippet:
> 
> "
> I would suggest that you first quantify current noise performance (slow comparators -> 0x64 to reduce rate, measure pulser peak width) for each FEE64 (use layouts 3 and 4) and compare to Nabil's most recent test results. Looking at last night's 1.8.W spectra I would assume that they would be significantly worse but best to check.
> 
> I would then suggest you carefully check
> 
>     Grounding configuration (both internal and external to the snout) used Nabil's most recent tests has actually been re-established
>     Grounding of the bPlas cabling
> "
> 
> We are going to restart the DAQ and set the LEC thresholds to 0x64 and compare the peak FWHM with a pulser.
> 
> 11:50 We started up the DAQ temps and bias look OK.
> 
> 12:00 We set the thresholds on each ASIC in the slow comparator LEC to 0x64. This should correspond to a high threshold. For some reason the y-strips are still noisy (wrong polarity in the register ?)

13:28 we returned after a hearty lunch. When turning on the FEE64s we noticed that the bias of the CAEN to the detector increases by 0.3 V.

We rebiased and set the thresholds in one FEE64 aida02 to 0xff (very high, attachment 2) and the detector is still reading about 100 kHz ADC items. When the threshold was set to 0x64 it was 360 kHz (attachment 4).

We bias down the system to cross-check the cabling etc.

> > 
> > We have dismounted the AIDA stack and bPlast and realigned the cables so that they can fit into the adapters.
> > 
> > The plan for the next couple days is the following:
> > 
> > - Alignment -- done
> > - Remount cable -- done
> > - Fix position w/o bPlast mounted -- done
> > - Remount bracket for the last stage -- done
> > - Remount AIDA 1 & 2 and the 207Bi source with the source holder -- done
> > - Mount the snout and take data -- we wait till next week Monday when the heat exchanger is active again. (ongoing)
> > 
> > The current setup at the end of work is that the snout is mount with a bPlast (uncabled) and 2 AIDA layers at the regular spaced position with a 207Bi source down stream, as can be seen in the previous elog. The source is ~1 cm away from the middle AIDA wafer.
> > 
> > Currently what is cabled:
> > 
> > - Signal out from the detector
> > - Bias daisy chain
> > 
> > Still to be cabled:
> > 
> > - HV cable
> > - Grounding
> > - Pulser
> > 
> > Additional info on the source position:
> > - the source is at ~9.6 mm distance from the downstream detector
> > - the source is placed at the centre of the middle wafer: 12.25 cm in x, 4.75 cm in y
> > - the radius of the source is ~1.5 mm
> 
> The Messhuette has been cleaned and equipment has been rearranged. If there are any broken or missing components be sure to follow up with the FRS group (as I believe they have been cleaning here).
> 
> We are resuming the work on the source measurements as the cooling water is back. Some of the valves still look closed so we are investigating if the water is flowing to the setup.
> 
> 14:31 Temperature on start up OK - attachment 2.
> 
> 15:41 We reset the ASIC control registers to a setup used in Feb 2024 (2025Feb24-17.14.52) to match the full AIDA setup (it was using BB7 initially in aida10).
> 
> The old bias scheme is obsolete and the bias is now done via the Ohmic side.
> 
> 16:47 We have look at some initial spectra with the 207Bi 3-8 shows the ADC channels and waveforms of the n+n and p+n sides. Bias and grounding developed by Nabiel have been done.
> 
> We are going to wait for the system to stabilise over night so that we start taking data tomorrow. Then we can analyse the results and see what we get :) Some channels are clearly broken which can be seen in the waveforms eg. aida16.

11:31 The detector was turned off last night to put it into a safe state. We return to make some comparison of the noise w.r.t the tests performed by Nabil and co. 

email snippet:

"
I would suggest that you first quantify current noise performance (slow comparators -> 0x64 to reduce rate, measure pulser peak width) for each FEE64 (use layouts 3 and 4) and compare to Nabil's most recent test results. Looking at last night's 1.8.W spectra I would assume that they would be significantly worse but best to check.

I would then suggest you carefully check

    Grounding configuration (both internal and external to the snout) used Nabil's most recent tests has actually been re-established
    Grounding of the bPlas cabling
"

We are going to restart the DAQ and set the LEC thresholds to 0x64 and compare the peak FWHM with a pulser.

11:50 We started up the DAQ temps and bias look OK.

12:00 We set the thresholds on each ASIC in the slow comparator LEC to 0x64. This should correspond to a high threshold. For some reason the y-strips are still noisy (wrong polarity in the register ?)

19.45 Remote system check

      DSSSD bias & leakage currents OK - attachment 1

      FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 2
       aida02 ASIC temperature often reporting zero but sometimes a sensible value - presumably PT100 fault

      ADC data item stats - attachment 3
       all FEE64s at high/very high rates - only 3x of 16x FEE64s < 100k
       ASIC settings per aida01-aida04
        p+n FEE64s slow comparator 0xa, n+n FEE64s 0xf cf. 0x64 used for previous tests by Nabil? 

      per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachment 4

      per FEE64 1.8.W spectra - 20us FSR - attachments 5-6


19.55 Switch to safe state (FEE64 power OFF, DSSSD HV OFF) overnight as appears to be unattended/not monitored overnight.

      Tomorrow I would suggest resuming tests (using slow comparator 0x64) and checking per FEE64 pulser peak width for comparison with previous tests by Nabil. If 
unable to reproduce previous tests (or previous AIDA performance) you will need to check setup/reduce noise to be able to perform measurements using the 207Bi source.

> 
> We have dismounted the AIDA stack and bPlast and realigned the cables so that they can fit into the adapters.
> 
> The plan for the next couple days is the following:
> 
> - Alignment -- done
> - Remount cable -- done
> - Fix position w/o bPlast mounted -- done
> - Remount bracket for the last stage -- done
> - Remount AIDA 1 & 2 and the 207Bi source with the source holder -- done
> - Mount the snout and take data -- we wait till next week Monday when the heat exchanger is active again. (ongoing)
> 
> The current setup at the end of work is that the snout is mount with a bPlast (uncabled) and 2 AIDA layers at the regular spaced position with a 207Bi source down stream, as can be seen in the previous elog. The source is ~1 cm away from the middle AIDA wafer.
> 
> Currently what is cabled:
> 
> - Signal out from the detector
> - Bias daisy chain
> 
> Still to be cabled:
> 
> - HV cable
> - Grounding
> - Pulser
> 
> Additional info on the source position:
> - the source is at ~9.6 mm distance from the downstream detector
> - the source is placed at the centre of the middle wafer: 12.25 cm in x, 4.75 cm in y
> - the radius of the source is ~1.5 mm

The Messhuette has been cleaned and equipment has been rearranged. If there are any broken or missing components be sure to follow up with the FRS group (as I believe they have been cleaning here).

We are resuming the work on the source measurements as the cooling water is back. Some of the valves still look closed so we are investigating if the water is flowing to the setup.

14:31 Temperature on start up OK - attachment 2.

15:41 We reset the ASIC control registers to a setup used in Feb 2024 (2025Feb24-17.14.52) to match the full AIDA setup (it was using BB7 initially in aida10).

The old bias scheme is obsolete and the bias is now done via the Ohmic side.

16:47 We have look at some initial spectra with the 207Bi 3-8 shows the ADC channels and waveforms of the n+n and p+n sides. Bias and grounding developed by Nabiel have been done.

We are going to wait for the system to stabilise over night so that we start taking data tomorrow. Then we can analyse the results and see what we get :) Some channels are clearly broken which can be seen in the waveforms eg. aida16.

We have dismounted the AIDA stack and bPlast and realigned the cables so that they can fit into the adapters.

The plan for the next couple days is the following:

- Alignment -- done
- Remount cable -- done
- Fix position w/o bPlast mounted -- done
- Remount bracket for the last stage -- done
- Remount AIDA 1 & 2 and the 207Bi source with the source holder -- done
- Mount the snout and take data -- we wait till next week Monday when the heat exchanger is active again. (ongoing)

The current setup at the end of work is that the snout is mount with a bPlast (uncabled) and 2 AIDA layers at the regular spaced position with a 207Bi source down stream, as can be seen in the previous elog. The source is ~1 cm away from the middle AIDA wafer.

Currently what is cabled:

- Signal out from the detector
- Bias daisy chain

Still to be cabled:

- HV cable
- Grounding
- Pulser

Additional info on the source position:
- the source is at ~9.6 mm distance from the downstream detector
- the source is placed at the centre of the middle wafer: 12.25 cm in x, 4.75 cm in y
- the radius of the source is ~1.5 mm

We have dismounted the AIDA stack and bPlast and realigned the cables so that they can fit into the adaptors.

The plan for the next couple days is the following:

- Alignment -- done
- Remount cable -- ongoing
- Fix position w/o bPlast mounted -- 
- Remount bracket for the last stage -- 
- Remount AIDA 1 & 2 and the 207Bi source with the source holder -- 
- Mount the snout and take data --

The tests we want to perform are the following:

- Energy distribution in x and y for ADC items and cluster
- The cluster size from conversion electrons
- ADC offsets with the 207Bi source after performing a pulser walkthrough
- Threshold test /w a 207Bi source - varying the threshold as while the source is in place and seeing when the 207Bi peaks are cut off. 
- Background run without the 207Bi source (after the above tests)
- Possible test with a 152Eu source as well to measure conversion electrons from Eu could also be an option but we would need to discuss how to do this since all the 152Eu source are closed. We could possibly measure the compton edge from this 
data.

HT of upstream AIDA from iseg, HT cable shielded, 100V, 17 uA. HT of downstream AIDA from CAEN, AIDA#0. Both channel 0 and 1 of CAEN are on, even though there is just one channel connected. DEGAS platform closed. The crates of BB7 and bplast have been put to the ground of the AIDA's structure (cupper sheet)

Attachment 1: TEST1: BB7 fully connected = 2 tiles of BB7 have been connected to the mesytec preamps. BB7 is not biased. The mesytec preamps have been fully connected and supplied but 6/8 black cables are not connected on the other side. 4X and 4Y are connected to the 2 FEBEX cards. The cables of BB7 right between the snout and the preamps are shielded.

AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 76-80 channels

Attachment 2: TEST2: BB7 fully disconnected

AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 71 channels

Attachment 3: TEST3: BB7 fully disconnected, TAMEX crate unbiased, BB7 NIM crate turned off

AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 67 channels

Attachment 4: AIDA01.1.0 --> FWHM 171 channels --> same detector, also biased with iseg but bad results

HT cable shielded, HT of upstream AIDA from iseg, HT of downstream AIDA from CAEN. Both channel 0 and 1 of CAEN are on, even though there is just one channel connected. During this test, some parallele tests are being done on BB7 Mesytec. In general, middle tile: detector disconnected from preamps but preamps connected on the other side.  Right tile: detector connected to preamps, cable shielded but preamps disconnected on the other side (supplied, one output is plugged). Those conditions may have changed during the test. The BB7 and bplast crates are also being connected to the cupper sheet of AIDA's structure to be grounded, the carton pieces under the crates have been removed.

AIDA05 connected, HT 0V

Attachment 1: AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 1907 channels

Attachment 2: AIDA09.1.9L --> FWHM 1467 channels

AIDA05 connected, HT 100V

Attachment 3: AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 74 channels

Attachment 4: AIDA09.1.8L --> FWHM 79 channels

Attachment 5: AIDA13.1.8L --> FWHM 250 channels

AIDA05 disconnected, HT 0V (cable between the detector and the adaptor board)

Attachment 6: AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 16 channels

AIDA05 disconnected, HT 100V

Attachment 7: AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 16 channels

Attachment 8: AIDA09.1.8L --> FWHM 87 channels

Attachment 9: AIDA13.1.8L --> FWHM 234 channels

Attachment 10: AIDA12.1.8L --> FWHM 116 channels (bplast cable side disconnected) to be compared to 117 channels (screenshot forgotten to be saved but tags left 21600 and 21171) --> no effect

BB7 is still connected but not biased (same configuration as the previous elog). The channel of the CAEN power supply #0 is connected to ASIC08 and biased at 100V. The channel of the CAEN power supply #1 is disconnected but still biased at 100V. AIDA04 (chained to AIDA05) is biased via an unshielded cable to an iseg NHQ 246L power supplied, biased at 100 V with 15 uA.

All the outside drain wires of bplast are now taped to the snout.

The red markers of the cursors of the previous test have been left for ease of comparison.

Attachment 1: AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 67 channels

Attachment 2: AIDA05.1.1L --> FWHM 69 channels

Attachment 3: AIDA05.1.4L --> FWHM 79 channels

Attachment 4: AIDA05.1.12L --> FWHM 79 channels

Attachment 5: AIDA05.1.15L --> FWHM 79 channels

Attachment 6: AIDA13.1.8L --> FWHM 236 channels, chosen because same place than AIDA05 but for the dowstream detector that is still biased with the CAEN module

Attachment 7: AIDA12.1.8L --> FWHM 91 channels, chosen because same place than AIDA05 but of the bottom of upstream detector that is still biased with the iseg module

Attachment 8: AIDA16.1.8L --> FWHM 143 channels, chosen because same place than AIDA05 of the bottom of dowstream detector that is still biased with the CAEN module. This curve has 2 humps

BB7 is still connected but not biased (same configuration as the previous elog). The channel of the CAEN power supply #0 is connected to ASIC08 and biased at 100V. The channel of the CAEN power supply #1 is disconnected but still biased at 100V. AIDA04 (chained to AIDA05) is biased via a shielded cable to an iseg NHQ 246L power supplied, biased at 101 V with 16 uA.

All the outside drain wires of bplast are now taped to the snout.

Attachment 1: AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 60 channels

Attachment 2: AIDA05.1.1L --> FWHM 51 channels

Attachment 3: AIDA05.1.4L --> FWHM 57 channels

Attachment 4: AIDA05.1.12L --> FWHM 65 channels

Attachment 5: AIDA05.1.15L --> FWHM 69 channels

Attachment 6: AIDA13.1.8L --> FWHM 277 channels, chosen because same place than AIDA05 but for the dowstream detector that is still biased with the CAEN module

Attachment 7: AIDA12.1.8L --> FWHM 88 channels, chosen because same place than AIDA05 but of the bottom of upstream detector that is still biased with the iseg module

Attachment 8: AIDA16.1.8L --> FWHM 133 channels, chosen because same place than AIDA05 of the bottom of dowstream detector that is still biased with the CAEN module. This curve has 2 humps

Attachment1: AIDA05.1.8L when AIDA05 connected, biased at 101 V with shielded cables. BB7 is still connected but not biased (same configuration as the previous elog). The channel of the CAEN power supply #0 is connected to ASIC08 and biased at 100V. The channel of the CAEN power supply #1 is disconnected but still biased at 100V. AIDA04 (chained to AIDA05) is biased via a shielded cable to an iseg NHQ 246L power supplied, biased at 101 V with 16 uA.

All the outside drain wires of bplast are now taped to the snout.

The red markers of the cursors of the previous test have been left for ease of comparison.

FWHM: 21699-21644 = 55 channels (to be compared with the previous elogs between 73 channels and 79 channels)

Conclusion: a significant improvement can be observed with a cleaner power supply.

Attachment1: AIDA05.1.8L when AIDA05 connected, biased at 100 V with not-shielded cables, after the DEGAS platform has been closed, the 2 tiles of BB7 have been connected to the mesytec preamps. BB7 is not biased. The mesytec preamps have been fully connected and supplied but 6/8 black cables are not connected on the other side. 4X and 4Y are connected to the 2 FEBEX cards.

The 2 drain wires of bplast that were hanging on the bottom are now taped to the snout, not making any antena effect anymore.

FWHM: 79 channels (to be compared with the previous elogs between 73 channels and 76 channels)

Conclusion: no significant differences can be observed when BB7 is connected. The tail on the left side of the spectrum in twice as small, most likely because on the now-taped drain wires of bplast

Attachment1: AIDA05.1.8L when AIDA05 connected, biased at 100 V with not-shielded cables, CAEN HT,  after the base of the snout (screws) has been connected to the ground via cupper sheets

FWHM: 76 channels (to be compared with the 2 previous elogs 73 channels and 75 channels)

Conclusion: no differences can be observed.

Biased at 100, AIDA05 connected, HT cables not shielded CAEN HT

Attachment 1: AIDA05.1.8L --> FWHM 75 channels

Attachment 2: AIDA05.1.1L --> FWHM 70 channels; peak of the pulser shifted to the right (red lines on the left: cursor for the 1.8L)

Attachment 3: AIDA05.1.4L --> FWHM 85 channels; peak of the pulser completely shifted to the left (10 000 on the left)

Attachment 4: AIDA05.1.12L --> FWHM 78 channels

Attachment 5: AIDA05.1.15L --> FWHM 79 channels, peak the most shifted to the right of the 5 curves tested

This elog is the first reliable. Before, the histograms have not been zero'd

Each test are done and compared for AIDA05.1.8L, compared with the pulser (caracteristics, see attachment1)

Test 1: with HT cables shielded

Attachment 2: HT = 100V; cable AIDA05 connected --> FWHM = 77 channels (= 51.3 keV) with a top of the curve at 100 cts (AIDA9.1.8L has also been checked and was at 89 channels)

Attachment 3: HT = 0V; cable AIDA05 connected --> FWHM = 1757 channels with a top of the curve at 15 cts after almost 40 min because the noise had a baseline of 6500 channels

Attachment 4: HT = 0V; cable AIDA05 disconnected --> FWHM = 16 channels with a top of the curve at 110 cts

Attachment 5: HT = 100V; cable AIDA05 disconnected --> FWHM = 17 channels with a top of the curve at 110 cts

Test 2: with HT cables not shielded

Attachment 6: HT = 0V; cable AIDA05 connected --> FWHM = 1452 channels (968 keV) with a top of the curve at 23 cts after 1:15 hours because the noise had a baseline of 7000 channels

Attachment 7: HT = 100V; cable AIDA05 connected --> FWHM = 73 channels with a top of the curve at 100 cts

Attachment 8: HT = 0V; cable AIDA05 disconnected --> FWHM = 15 channels with a top of the curve at 120 cts

Attachment 9: HT = 100V; cable AIDA05 disconnected --> FWHM = 16 channels with a top of the curve at 125 cts

Conclusion: with shielded or unshielded cables, the noise situation seems to be the same, proving that mot of the noise don't come from the cables

Other thing that have been noticed is that the peak of the pulser is shifted when the cables are connected compared to when they are not connected: connected: peak at around channel 21675; disconnected: peak at around channel 21925

AIDA05 completely disconnected, all the others FEEs64 are fully connected

Attachment 1: aida05, FWHM= 95 ch, 63 keV

Attachment 2: aida15, FWHM= 108 ch, 74 keV

Test with shielded HV cables for both detectors.

The FWHM for ch1 is now 184 ch.

Yesterday cables for cards 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16 were partially connected (only 1 out of 2 flat cables was in), now both are connected.

Status before grounding checks