ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
526
|
Sun Feb 18 13:10:18 2024 |
TD | Sunday 18 February - DSSSD 0 aida01 and aida04 *.*.L spectra |
DSSSD 0 aida01 1*L spectra, aida04 **L spectra
Double peak structure feature of aida04 ( n+n Ohmic side ) strips. Single ( albeit sometimes broad peak ) observed in aida01 ( p+n junction side ) strips.
Not currently observed by DSSSD 1-3. DSSSD 0 high energy peak rate far higher than DSSSD 1-3.
Data from last week did not display this double peak but DSSSDs and beam have been moved since.
Unclear whether this reflects radiation damage and/or wafer/active area edge effects on the n+n side.
Might also reflect beam characteristics throughout cycle.
Requires calibration and dE cut to investigate.
JM comment -> early time cut analysis indicates this is a beam effect. DSSD#0 has majority of halo on it so double peak is very pronounced.
We observe double peak all DSSDs just to a much lower level. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-58-29.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_13-59-55.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_14-01-19.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_14-08-36.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_14-09-44.png
|
|
527
|
Sun Feb 18 13:58:33 2024 |
AR, OF, JM | Run 42 - cooled beam on target |
Run 42 - 15:00
Detectors IN (left arm pot =36.54 mm, right arm pot = 70.49 mm). Stationary. Same as run 40
Electron cooler voltage 751.89 V this corresponds to 1.3444 MeV/u. This should be on the right of the peak of the resonance.
Target density is 5.03e11 at/cm2, ring pressure looks OK YR09 2.36e-10 mbar.
Horizontal beam position is -7.5 mm, vertical beam position is 0.0 mm. Same as run 40.
Beam is in the ring for 4 seconds and total cycle time between injections is 8 seconds. Notice this is the samet as run 40, different to run 35.
Statistics, merger statistics, histograms all zero'd
System wide checks ok. Temperatures ok. Leakage current ok. Merger ok.
Attatchment 1: Stats
Attatchment 2: Temperatures
Attatchments 3-6: Waveforms
Attatchment 7:Leakage current
Attatchment 8: Monitoring code rates
15.35 DSSSD #0 leakage current trending somewhat upwards cf. somewhat downwards for DSSSD #1-3
ML CRYRING hall ambient temprature c. 17.7. deg C and on downward trend.
Probably indicates radiation damage/surface charging of DSSSD #0 - leave DSSSD #0 biased for 24-48h following run and monitor leakage current
15:46
Seeing some beam intensity drops occasionally. Small drop that instantamnously went back up around 15:20 and then stbale beam unitl around 15:44 and then two small-time beam drops within 2 minutes. See attatchment 9. Continuing to monitor. Target density remains stable at 5e11.
16:45
Beam dropping again and continuing to drop (began at 16:35). Target density 4.7e11. Called HKR and they will try to increase the intensity. See attatchment 10.
17:00
System checks ok. Temperatures ok. Leakage current plot okay. Merger ok. Beam intensity still reduced to same amount as in attatchment 10). Target density approx 5e11.
Attatchment 1:1 Stats
Attatchment 12: Temperatures
Attatchments 13-16: Waveforms
Attatchment 17:Leakage current
Attatchment 18: Monitoring code rates
17:10
HKR cryring asked for target to be removed to check intensity. Target was removed.
17:17
Target back in, intensity back to around 2.5e7. Stable. Target desity 5e11.
18:42
All system checks and tempeatures ok. Beam stable. Target 2.3e11.
Leakage current: red line still trending upwards but slowly. See image 24.
10:30
Beam went down about 21:45. Called HKR and they were able to almost immediately restore the beam. Beam intensity ~2.5e7.
Target density 5.6e11 at/cm2, pressure in YR09 ~2.5e-10 mbar.
FEE temps and system check OK
Merger and tape server OK
Merger stats (attachment 25)
All rates in spectrum browser look OK
Monitoring code rates indicate beam on target.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-06-55.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-07-13.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-07-56.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-08-32.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-09-10.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-10-02.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-10-44.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_15-11-03.png
|
|
Attachment 9: IMG_7922.jpg
|
|
Attachment 10: IMG_7932.jpg
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_16-58-04.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_16-58-17.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_16-59-30.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-00-01.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-00-32.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-00-53.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-01-32.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_17-01-45.png
|
|
Attachment 19: IMG_7934.jpg
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-42-41.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-43-16.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-43-35.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-43-58.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-44-24.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-44-44.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_18-44-52.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_22-42-10.png
|
|
528
|
Sun Feb 18 22:03:56 2024 |
TD | Run 42 night shift |
23.03 DAQ continues file G22-86/R42_21
ML CRYRING ambient temperature and vacuum - attachments 1 & 2
DSSSD bias & leakage current - attachments 3 & 24
DSSSD #0 trending upwards , DSSSD #1-3 trending downwards with decreasing ambient temperature
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachments 4-5
23.07 All system wide checks OK
WR timestamps OK - attachment 6
ADC, DISC, PAUSE and correlation stats OK - attachments 7-10
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 11-12
per FEE64 Stat spectra - attachments 13-14
per FEE64 1.8.L, 1.8.H and 1.8.W 20us FSR spectra - attachments 15-20
Merger, Merger stats and TapeServer OK - attachments 21-23
online analysis spectra - attachments 25-30
23.28 all histograms, stats, Merger stats zero'd
online analysis restarted
23.35 target density 5.83e+11/cm2
beam no change in last 3 hours ( cannot read scale with X2Go )
see attachments 31-33
00.58 DAQ continues file G22-86/R42_24
DSSSD bias & leakage current - attachments 34-35
DSSSD #0 trending upwards , DSSSD #1-3 trending downwards with decreasing ambient temperature
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachments 36-37
ADC data item stats - attachment 38
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 39
target density 5.75e+11/cm2
beam no change in last 3 hours ( cannot read scale with X2Go )
03.14 DAQ continues file G22-86/R42_28
DSSSD bias & leakage current - attachments 40-41
DSSSD #0 trending upwards , DSSSD #1-3 trending downwards with decreasing ambient temperature
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachments 42-43
ADC data item stats - attachment 44
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 45
target density 5.91e+11/cm2
beam decreased in last 3 hours ( cannot read scale with X2Go )
see attachments 46-47
03:30 beam recovered
online analysis rates DSSSD#0 recovered to values observed at start of shift |
Attachment 1: Capture.PNG
|
|
Attachment 2: Capture_2.PNG
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-05-47.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-06-14.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-06-56.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-07-42.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-08-07.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-08-29.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-08-53.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-09-16.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-10-18.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-10-41.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-11-31.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-11-48.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-12-38.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-13-20.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-14-03.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-14-45.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-15-21.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-15-58.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-16-33.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-16-49.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-17-01.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-10.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-26.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-38.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-48.png
|
|
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-18-59.png
|
|
Attachment 29: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-19-18.png
|
|
Attachment 30: Screenshot_from_2024-02-18_23-19-39.png
|
|
Attachment 31: 20240218_223433.jpg
|
|
Attachment 32: 20240218_223341.jpg
|
|
Attachment 33: 20240218_223509.jpg
|
|
Attachment 34: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-54-56.png
|
|
Attachment 35: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-55-14.png
|
|
Attachment 36: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-55-44.png
|
|
Attachment 37: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-56-14.png
|
|
Attachment 38: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-56-42.png
|
|
Attachment 39: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_00-57-31.png
|
|
Attachment 40: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-14-25.png
|
|
Attachment 41: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-14-48.png
|
|
Attachment 42: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-15-18.png
|
|
Attachment 43: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-15-43.png
|
|
Attachment 44: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-16-04.png
|
|
Attachment 45: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_03-16-50.png
|
|
Attachment 46: 20240219_022309.jpg
|
|
Attachment 47: 20240219_022316.jpg
|
|
529
|
Mon Feb 19 05:10:48 2024 |
TD | Run 42 night shift contd. |
06.03 DAQ continues file G22-86/R42_32
DSSSD bias & leakage current - attachments 1-2
DSSSD #0 trending upwards , DSSSD #1-3 trending downwards with decreasing ambient temperature
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachments 3-4
ADC data item stats - attachment 5
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachments 6
target density 5.27e+11/cm2
beam stable for last 3 hours ( cannot read scale with X2Go ) |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-03-26.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-03-41.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-04-07.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-05-27.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-05-51.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_06-06-15.png
|
|
530
|
Mon Feb 19 06:01:17 2024 |
SHB, JM, JG | Run 42 morning shift |
07:00
Observed reduction in YR09 presure over last few hours in ML online plot. Beam intensity looks OK but target density was fluctuating quite a lot. Current value was 1.5e11.
Changed the nozzle position slightly which increased target density to 5.5e11. Pressure in YR09 looks OK.
I accidently scrolled slightly with the target code (only by 100 but am not sure). Target looks stable but I will not touch remotely again for fear of losing total target position.
Rates in ADC data items statistics and in the monitoring code look consistent with beam on target.
08:56
Target density reduced again to 1.5e11. Changed the nozzle position slightly in X and recovered 5.5e11 at/cm2
Beam intensity looks OK
FEE temps OK
System checks OK
Merger and tape server OK
Statistics ADC data items and spectrum browser rates OK
Merger stats attachement 5
leakage current plot attachment 6
Online monitoring code rates OK
09:33
Run stopped to change beam energy
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-11-42.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-12-02.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-12-27.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-12-47.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-57-23.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_08-59-08.png
|
|
531
|
Mon Feb 19 08:45:22 2024 |
JM, JG, SHB, EM, EH | Run 44 - cooled beam on target |
09:43
Run 44 started cooled beam on target
Detectors IN (left arm pot =36.5 mm, right arm pot = 70.49 mm). Stationary. Same as previous runs
Electron cooler voltage 751.4 V this corresponds to 1.3436 MeV/u. This should be back on the peak of the resonance.
Target density is 5.2e11 at/cm2, ring pressure looks OK YR09 1.72e-10 mbar. Target density is not very stable and requires small corrections in the x position to maintain a target
Horizontal beam position is -7.5 mm, vertical beam position is 0.0 mm. Same as previous run
Beam is in the ring for 6 seconds and total cycle time between injections is 10 seconds. Notice this is different than previous runs. Aim is to have a few different cycle time configurations to see effect on halo
Statistics, merger statistics, histograms all zero'd
10:05
FEE temps OK
System checks OK
Merger OK, tape server OK
Leakage current plot attachment 1
ADC data items stats attachment 2
Monitoring code rates attachment 3
11:08
FEE temps OK
System checks OK
Merger OK, tape server OK
Leakage current OK
ADC data items stats OK
Online spectra OK
12:30
FEE temps OK
System checks OK
Merger OK, tape server OK
Leakage current OK
ADC data items stats OK
Online spectra OK
14:03
FEE temps OK
System checks OK
Merger OK, tape server OK
Leakage current OK
ADC data items stats OK
Online spectra OK
15:36
FEE temps OK, system checks OK, merger OK,
Screenshot 4: temperatures
Screenshot 5: statistics
Screenhot 6 - 9: spectra (there is a persistent peak in aida13 in Layout8)
Screenshot 10: leakage current (current 1 seems to be going up slowly but steadily)
Screenshot 11: spectrum
17:18
FEE temps OK, system checks OK, merger OK,
Screenshot 12: temperatures
Screenshot 13: statistics
Screenhot 14 - 17: spectra (we still see a peak in aida13 in Layout8, but not always)
Screenshot 18: leakage current (current 1 seems to be going up slowly but steadily)
Screenshot 19: spectrum
19:27
FEE temps OK, system checks OK, merger OK,
Screenshot 20: temperatures
Screenshot 21: statistics
Screenhot 22 - 25: spectra (we still see a peak in aida13 in Layout8, but not always)
Screenshot 26: leakage current (current 1 seems to be going up slowly but steadily)
Screenshot 27: spectrum
21:57
FEE temps OK, system checks OK, merger OK,
Screenshot 28: temperatures
Screenshot 29: statistics
Screenhot 30 - 33: spectra (we still see a peak in aida13 in Layout8, but not always)
Screenshot 34: leakage current
Screenshot 35: spectrum
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_10-07-26.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_10-10-24.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_10-10-50.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_15-31-30.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_15-31-47.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_15-32-57.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_15-33-22.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_15-33-46.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_15-34-51.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_15-35-23.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_15-35-29.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_17-13-45.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_17-14-05.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_17-15-12.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_17-15-52.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_17-16-24.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_17-17-25.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_17-17-44.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_17-17-51.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_19-24-13.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_19-26-55.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_19-24-59.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_19-25-21.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_19-25-51.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_19-26-41.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_19-27-22.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_19-27-29.png
|
|
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_21-54-34.png
|
|
Attachment 29: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_21-54-46.png
|
|
Attachment 30: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_21-55-17.png
|
|
Attachment 31: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_21-55-41.png
|
|
Attachment 32: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_21-56-02.png
|
|
Attachment 33: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_21-56-50.png
|
|
Attachment 34: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_21-57-23.png
|
|
Attachment 35: Screenshot_from_2024-02-19_21-57-30.png
|
|
532
|
Mon Feb 19 21:46:32 2024 |
EH, EM, CB | Run 45 + end of late shift |
22:54
We have moved the gas jet target out (y=4000), the density has dropped to zero.
Started a new run (Run45) for background measurement.
Informed HKR that the experiment will be monitored remotely without on-site personnel. They will check on the beam intensity.
02:08
System wide checks OK
Temperatures OK
Leakage current going up - OK
Stats OK
Merger continues OK
Reset the online spectra (had not been done yet for this run).
20s rate looks fine, around 1000 counts/s on top left detector. Maybe we are hitting it with beam? But then we should be see a reduction in beam intensity, we do not.
04:00
System wide checks OK
Temps OK
Stats OK
Merger OK
06:20
Beam intensity quite unstable, but HKR is correcting - attach 7
Systems wide checks OK
Temps OK
Merger OK
Stats OK
Some interesting features can be seen in the online histograms, e.g. no peak at 16 MeV and a clear straight line in the Ex vs x plot.
07:20
DAQ crashed due to multiple merger / tape server / HTTPD server instances being opened on workspace 5
Cannot soft reboot. FEEs off. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_02-02-14.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_02-02-47.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_02-03-07.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_02-03-31.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_02-04-40.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_02-06-37.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Beam_intensity.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_06-15-54.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_06-16-09.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_06-16-39.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_06-17-11.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_06-17-35.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_06-18-29.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_06-18-58.png
|
|
533
|
Tue Feb 20 07:50:10 2024 |
JM | DAQ restart |
DAQ restarted. Run46. All appears OK, aida01 shows high rates across ASIC 4 even with no beam which could not be resolved via ASIC control. May suggest some damge.
Merger is running and tape server is writing data to disk. Data rate is about 1300 kB/sec from 800 kb/sec due to increase in aida01 rate.
FEE temps OK
All system checks OK
Detectors moved to IN position (left arm pot = 36.5 mm, right arm =70.49 mm). Target ON.
Lost beam again.
Run 47 started.
|
534
|
Tue Feb 20 08:41:08 2024 |
OF, AG | still no beam CRYRING |
We have mosty empty injections into CRYRING. Only sporadically the beam with good intensity is injected.
Michael Lestinsky is currently working on the problem. |
535
|
Tue Feb 20 09:51:37 2024 |
JM | Run 48 beam on target |
Run 48 started |
536
|
Tue Feb 20 09:57:57 2024 |
OF, AG, ML | Run 48 status check |
Doing morning check. Checked the leakage currents, all ok. Attachment 1
Temperatures ok, attchment 2
System wide check, all correct.
Statistics ok (as far as we can tell) attachment 3
Spectrum browser ok, attachment 4
Checked merger, spinner spinning...
Attachment 5 shows the BPM scope (i.e. induced signals from the ion buchnes) for the duration of injection, bunching, acceleration, debunching.
Beam current is around 2.5E7 and the target dencity is 6.3E11 cm2. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_11-06-48.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_11-08-05.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_11-12-26.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_11-13-58.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 2024-02-20_11-37-46-304.png
|
|
537
|
Tue Feb 20 13:20:44 2024 |
OF, AG, JG, ML | R48 status check |
Doing afternoon check. Checked the leakage currents, all ok. Attachment 1
Temperatures ok, attchment 2
System wide check, all correct.
Statistics ok (as far as we can tell) attachment 3
Spectrum browser ok, attachment 4
Checked merger, spinner spinning...
Beam current is around 2.2 E7 and the target dencity is 6.3E11 cm2. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_14-22-05.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_14-22-49.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_14-29-39.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_14-34-55.png
|
|
538
|
Tue Feb 20 14:12:32 2024 |
JM | Shutdown |
CARME DAQ shutdown. FEEs turned OFF and all MIDAS server windows closed.
Detector bias turned OFF.
Final leakage current plot - attachment 1 |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_15-11-40.png
|
|
539
|
Wed Feb 21 07:38:32 2024 |
TD | Wedneday 21 February |
10.54 23.2.24 Bias OFF |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_18-40-08.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-02-20_21-30-08.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-02-21_01-00-13.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-02-21_05-10-07.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-02-21_08-30-06.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-02-21_20-45-58.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-02-21_20-46-12.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-02-22_00-51-21.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-02-22_14-02-29.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-02-22_14-02-44.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-02-22_19-00-08.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-02-22_19-00-31.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-02-23_11-53-32.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-02-23_11-53-45.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Capture_10.55.PNG
|
|
Attachment 16: Capture_18.00.PNG
|
|
Attachment 17: Capture_13.04.PNG
|
|
Attachment 18: Capture_23.52.PNG
|
|
Attachment 19: Capture_19.46.PNG
|
|
Attachment 20: Capture_07.30.PNG
|
|
Attachment 21: Capture_04.10.PNG
|
|
Attachment 22: Capture_00.00.PNG
|
|
Attachment 23: Capture_20.30.PNG
|
|
Attachment 24: Capture_17.40.PNG
|
|
540
|
Wed Mar 6 10:47:11 2024 |
JG, TD | Wednesday 6 March - PEXARIA5 WR test |
Courtesy Nik Kurz, JG has installed a PEXARIA5 PCIe card adjacent to CARME - BuTIS single-mode fibre input
and HDMI output to root MACB input for distribution to the other MACBs and FEE64s.
The PEXARIA5 card provides equivalent functionality to the VETAR2 VME module that we have used to date.
Further information https://www.gsi.de/fileadmin/EE/Module/EXPLODER/pexaria5_14.pdf
Cooling water ON
Via Anydesk startup MIDAS and FEE64s
Power ON
DSSSD HV OFF ( not required for WR test )
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 1
All system wide checks OK
Info code 4 & 5 stats OK - attachments 2 & 3
10:48:46 WR timestamps OK - attachment 4
Timestamp (ns) converted to (s) corresponds to 09.49.22 GMT 6.3.24 which appears to be correct
11.00 Power OFF |
Attachment 1: temps.PNG
|
|
Attachment 2: stats_1.PNG
|
|
Attachment 3: stats_2.PNG
|
|
Attachment 4: wr_0949.PNG
|
|
541
|
Thu Apr 18 13:34:06 2024 |
TD, JG | Thursday 18 April |
14.30
per FEE64 1.8.L spectra
aida11 pulser peak width 52 ch FWHM
14.45 EG&G Ortec 448 Pulser OFF
all stats & histograms zero'd
alpha background
22.00 DSSSD bias and leakage current OK - attachment 10
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 11
ADC data item stats - attachment 12
per FEE64 Stat spectra - attachment 13
Comparison of attachment 9 (per FEE64 Rate spectra with pulser) indicates significant issues (downstream of adaptor PCB) for DSSSD #1
Possible issues asics #3 aida01 and possible adaptor PCB misalignment aida05 |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_14-22-41.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_14-23-10.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_14-23-51.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_14-24-18.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_14-27-33.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_14-28-26.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_14-31-14.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_14-32-31.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_14-43-27.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_21-57-51.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_21-58-31.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_21-59-11.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-04-18_21-59-35.png
|
|
542
|
Fri Apr 19 02:47:59 2024 |
TD | Friday 19 April |
03.45
10.01
10.05 DSSSD bias OFF
FEE64 power OFF |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_03-45-09.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_03-46-43.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_03-47-13.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_03-48-48.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_10-53-30.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_10-53-54.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_10-54-37.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_10-57-32.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_10-58-15.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_10-59-15.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_11-00-45.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-04-19_11-04-21.png
|
|
543
|
Tue Apr 23 17:44:41 2024 |
TD | Tuesday 23 April |
18.43 ASIC settings 2024Feb08-15.59.09
aida06 pulser peak width 66 ch FWHM |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_18-53-39.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_18-56-31.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_18-58-49.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_18-59-18.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_19-02-02.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_19-05-12.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_19-05-42.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_19-06-15.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_19-10-40.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_19-14-23.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_19-16-12.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-04-23_19-16-46.png
|
|
544
|
Wed Apr 24 12:48:35 2024 |
TD | Wednesday 24 April |
Replace AIDA ASIC mezzanine of aida01
13.43 DSSSD bias & leakage current OK - attachment 1
ambient temperature 16.5 deg C
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 2
All system wide checks OK
WR timestamps OK - attachment 3
ADC data item stats OK - attachment 4
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachment 5
c. 10 strips (of 1024) not producing data
most missing strips are from aida05 - misaligned or damaged adaptor PCB?
per p+n FEE64 1.8.L spectra - attachment 6
aida01 pulser peak width 75 ch FWHM
common x/y scale => peak height proxy for peak width
per n+n FEE64 1.8.L spectra - attachment 7
aida01 pulser peak width 70 ch FWHM
per FEE64 1.8.W spectra - 20us FSR - attachments 8-11
Summary
All FEE64s appear to be working (except aida05 which has c. 8 missing channels) with pulser - which
validates the FEE64, ASICs and adaptor PCB.
Electronic noise c. 50keV FWHM for aida01 & aida03 - other FEE64s better/worse.
Preamplifier noise appears to be similar for all FEE64s which may suggest an issue with the test signal chain
Note
1) e-target is starting up
2) have identified some instances of poor CARME cable management/routing see https://elog.ph.ed.ac.uk/CARME/545
EG&G Ortec 448 Pulser
Amplitude 50,000
Normalise 5.00
x5 attenuator IN
t_r 100ns
tau_d 50us
Polarity +
Frequency relay line (50Hz)
Cooknell SA1 Summing Amplifier
inverted output to test - daisy chain
Current ASIC settings saved to 2024Apr24-14.14.03
14.48 Pulser OFF
All histograms & stats zero'd
LEC slow comparator 0x64 -> 0xff
HEC fast comparator 0x2 -> 0x5
background alpha run to validate signal path from DSSSD to FEE64 adaptor PCB
22.18 Start Merger & TapeServer - attachments 12-14
DSSSD bias & leakage current OK - attachment 21
ambient temperature 16.0 deg C
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 15
WR timestamps OK - attachment 16
ADC data item stats OK - attachment 17
per FEE64 Rate spectra - attachment 18
per p+n FEE64 1.8.L spectra - attachments 19-20 |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-43-29.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-44-02.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-45-01.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-45-28.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-45-46.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-47-59.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-52-50.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-55-02.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-55-32.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-56-48.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_13-55-59.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-19-55.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-20-16.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-20-30.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-21-58.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-22-22.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-22-57.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-23-27.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-24-37.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-25-30.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2024-04-24_22-27-58.png
|
|
545
|
Wed Apr 24 13:18:09 2024 |
TD | Examples of poor CARME cable management/routing |
Have observed some instances of poor CARME cable management/routing
Attachment 1 - SAES D-2000 ion pump HV cable (netal braid) transiting FEE64 cabling
Attachment 2 - CARME motor controller cable (grey plastic) transiting FEE64 cabling
General check and tidying up required. |
Attachment 1: 20240424_125858.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: 20240424_125929.jpg
|
|