|
ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
|
433
|
Thu May 12 16:30:47 2022 |
NH, OH, TD | Notes for mounting a second switch |
Update DHCPD as expected
Make sure new ethernet device is trusted in firewall
Make sure hosts is updated
make sure /home/Embedded/XilinxLinux/ppc_4xx/rfs/aida08/etc/hosts "myserver" points to correct ip address
make sure /MIDAS/linux-ppc_4xx/startup/aidaXX has netvar "TS_Server" pointing to correct ip address
Update the IP in /MIDAS/linux-ppc_4xx/startup/aida* |
|
93
|
Tue Nov 12 13:59:07 2019 |
NH, OH, CA | Awfully noisy waveforms |
Rates in all FEEs much higher than before - waveform shows very noisy in all systems. - attachment 1
Good event statistics - attachment 2
DISC in 7 and 3 above 300k
ASIC check load performed.
Good event statistics - attachment 3
Thesholds at 0xa for all FEE
Disc rate now 0 across all FEE
Pulser settings: attachment 4
pulser peak widths - FEE width(ch)
1 128
2 145
3 84
4 74
5 207
6 125
7 172
8 80
9 193
10 183
11 238
12 138
Attachments 5 & 6: pulser peaks for all FEE64
16.24: DAQ stop
slow comparator threshold changed to 0x64
ASIC check performed
Alpha run/DAQ start (w/ data transfer enabled) - writing to file 31Oct19/R13
Merger and TapeService ok - attachments 7 & 8 |
Attachment 1: awfulwaves121119.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 191112_GoodEvents.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 191112_StatsPostLoad.png
|
|
Attachment 4: pulsersettings191112.png
|
|
Attachment 5: pulserpeaksOdd.png
|
|
Attachment 6: pulserpeaks_Even.png
|
|
Attachment 7: merger191112.png
|
|
Attachment 8: tapeservice191112.png
|
|
|
94
|
Tue Nov 12 14:10:18 2019 |
NH, OH, CA | Aida10 Unusual Pulser Peak |
aida10 (no alpha rate recorded) has a strange pulser peak - looks like double peak?
Pulser terminator checked and OK...
All others "OK" but noise quite bad (see previous entry) |
Attachment 1: aida10-pulser-121119.png
|
|
Attachment 2: pulsers121119.png
|
|
Attachment 3: pulsersodd121119.png
|
|
|
385
|
Wed Oct 20 13:26:08 2021 |
NH, OH | AIDA Noise + Filtering |
Turn on AIDA (SL6) to investigate noise situation and impact of new RC filters on bias input
Current setup:
- No Detectors
- Pulser in fee14, fee8 *only*, no bias connected. FEEs isolated from each other
Pulser widths::
p+n grounds connected via bias link (no connection to HV bias itself)
ASIC | FEE14 Width | FEE8 Width
|
1.8.L | 14.41 | 21.86
|
2.8.L | 13.02 | 21.87
|
3.8.L | 12.57 | 21.52
|
4.8.L | 13.75 | 23.59
|
Note: FEE8 is connected via SA1 inverter -> cause of worse resolution
Plug bias into outer FEEs (14 + 8 + chaint o 6)
ASIC | FEE14 Width | FEE8 Width
|
1.8.L | 14.59 | 24.43
|
2.8.L | 12.73 | 22.25
|
3.8.L | 12.76 | 23.06
|
4.8.L | 14.36 | 23.31
|
Long run over lunch:
ASIC | FEE14 Width | FEE8 Width
|
1.8.L | 14.47 | 25.52
|
2.8.L | 12.83 | 24.26
|
3.8.L | 12.75 | 24.15
|
4.8.L | 14.58 | 26.93
|
Figures 1 & 2
Add HV filters
ASIC | FEE14 Width | FEE8 Width
|
1.8.L | 14.34 | 23.53
|
2.8.L | 12.67 | 23.82
|
3.8.L | 12.78 | 23.59
|
4.8.L | 13.88 | 25.76
|
Figures 3 & 4
Small improvement maybe?
Figs 5&6 - Oscilloscope before & after HV filter added
--
Plans for tomorrow (21/10/21)
- Reintroduce pulser cables through all FEEs to see impact on noise (maybe improved now)
- Measure pulser noise in battery DSO (+ other sourceS?)
- Add a DSSD and see impact on noise with HV filter
- Resistance from FEE64 adapter to mechanical ground
- Check pulser on the battery powered scope (Is the signal common to the power supply) |
Attachment 1: 211020_1316_fee14_bias_con_long_stats.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 211020_1314_fee8_bias_con_long_stat.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 211020_1421_fee14_bias_con_filtered_long.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 211020_1415_fee8_bias_con_filtered_long.png
|
|
Attachment 5: scope_before.png
|
|
Attachment 6: scope_after.png
|
|
|
509
|
Wed Jun 29 10:48:26 2022 |
NH, OH | AIDA Dismounted |
All detectors removed from single and triple AIDA snouts
Empty snouts *and* DSSDs (in boxes) stored in NH office |
|
545
|
Fri Mar 22 07:34:54 2024 |
NH, JB | Au Beam |
|
|
550
|
Tue Mar 26 10:32:05 2024 |
NH, JB | Tue 26 March |
Taken 4 FEE64s from CRYRING (the 4 easiest to access)
41:d8:2b
41:f6:5a
41:ee:71
41:d0:0e
In addition a FEE without rails marked only 20 was found in my old office for 5
- This probably came in a shipment to/for repairs
DSSSD#1 unbiased
DESPEC Platform moved out of beam and gamma platform moved from AIDA
JB works on grounding the original 8 DSSSD#1 FEEs
Connected grounding from ribbon cable drain to adapter PCB
Ground loop connected
AIDA rates unchanged bad still fig 1
Waves fig 2 (p+n 6000-9000)
Waves fig 3 (n+n 8000-10000)
Statistics fig 4 |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-03-26_14-39-35.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-03-26_14-40-05.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-03-26_14-40-30.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-03-26_14-41-56.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 20240326_144539.jpg
|
|
Attachment 6: 20240326_144638.jpg
|
|
Attachment 7: 20240326_144528.jpg
|
|
Attachment 8: 20240326_144659.jpg
|
|
Attachment 9: 20240326_144627.jpg
|
|
|
213
|
Fri Apr 9 16:45:29 2021 |
NH, HA. GA, GZ, OH, TD | AIDA Noise |
AIDA snout was reconnected and we saw originally a very good reduction in noise from S452 (fig 1)
Occasional bursts of increased rates were noticed, perhaps related to works in S4.
Tape rate at optimal conditions was around 6 MB/s
We still saw some extrinsic noise in waves, two frequencies observed : 1.5 MHz and 100 kHz or so
Figs 2, 3 are at 50 MS/s
Figs 4, 5 are at 5 MS/s
Today the situation has become a lot worse for reasons still unknown.
aida01 shows very strong noise, frequency 125 kHz or so it seems (still at 5 MS/s)
Amplitude 100 mV or so I think
Investigation still underway |
Attachment 1: Image_Pasted_at_2021-4-7_18-15.png.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 2: Image_Pasted_at_2021-4-8_16-142.png.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 3: Image_Pasted_at_2021-4-8_16-14.png.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 4: Image_Pasted_at_2021-4-8_16-17.png.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 5: Image_Pasted_at_2021-4-8_16-18.png.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 6: noise_aida_090421.png
|
|
|
415
|
Wed Apr 27 15:47:46 2022 |
NH, HA, SA, CJ | AIDA 27 Apr 22 |
Remount snout in S4 (photos to come)
Alignment with DEGAS OK but a bit short... DEGAS platform will be brought 31 mm closer to AIDA by rail adjustment
Can mount bPlas booster boards on old ITEM frames and also partly on AIDA snout (isolated)
-
Reconnect all adapter boards and grounds, bias AIDA...
HV OK. We still have a light leak at the snout endcap. "Fixed" with sheet for now
HV leakage currents figure 1
Start AIDA DAQ and check rates.. all seem OK. aida07 is very noisy other p+n good
Notice some issues in aida04, check and ribbon cable slightly loose on one side of adapter
No change to other FEEs.
Aida07 was inspected but nothing obviously wrong
Rates figure 2
Rate spectra figure 3
Wavesform figures 4 (p+n), 5 (n+n)
Pulser peak withs
p+n figure 6, width ~ 70 channels (50 keV)
n+n figure 7, width ~ 570 channels (400 keV)
n.b. double peak in aida14 is an artifact from an uncleared histogram
DSSDs debiased to allow work on bPlas cabling without tripping DSSDs |
Attachment 1: 2022-04-27_16-42-37_HV.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 022-04-27_16-39-58_Rates.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 2022-04-27_16-40-23_RatesSpectra.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 2022-04-27_16-41-46_pnwaves.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 2022-04-27_16-42-20_nn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 2022-04-27_16-43-30_pn_pulser_70ch.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 2022-04-27_16-44-18._nn_pulser_568ch.png
|
|
|
674
|
Mon Dec 9 12:28:01 2024 |
NH, CC, MP | Test of BB7 on AIDA Electronics |
BB7 connected to aida07, sitting in a cardboard box
Update Tcl/Tml files in ASIC, ASIC4 and sys.tml frm PJCS email to allow setting per-ASIC polarity on FEE64
Restart MIDAS@8015
Power on all FEEs
Note nnrpi is not responding to ssh... MP investigates if it ahs been unplugged
No, but a powercycle worked and fixed it
See error: /MIDAS/FEE_ASIC/aida06/ASICs.txt not found, create the folders
We see some data in the L spectra, and changing the settings from one ASIC seems to work properly
Stopped for CC/MP to determine the which ASICs correspond to p+n and n+n
Follow up: Alpha data overnight or source? |
|
632
|
Wed May 22 20:10:19 2024 |
NH, CC, HMA, MV, ZC, KZ | AIDA Snout Remounted |
AIDA and the Snout have been remounted in S4
I had a check of the AIDA connectors and all looked good, the kapton PCB connectors were sitting comfortably above the interstage and I saw no stressed/loose connectors.
Multimeter showed no continuity between snout or inter-stage and AIDA ground
We put a single layer of wide black tape inside the end-cap to improve the light seal and minimise reflections
After mounting the snout I managed to bias both DSSDs to 100 V with no issues. I had to raise the DSSD#1 (Ch0) limit to 40 uA because it rises quite high during ramp up (then settles).
It is very hot in S4 (28 C) and the roof is closed for high-radiation experiments, so I expect it to get hotter. DSSD leakage currents were similar to before (20 and 15 uA)
There is also the new Temp and Humidity monitor, which you can view on AnyDesk at 192.168.11.119 (I think), there is a firefox window open already |
Attachment 1: 20240522_153750.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: 20240522_153752.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: 20240522_153755.jpg
|
|
Attachment 4: 20240522_153757.jpg
|
|
Attachment 5: 20240522_153805.jpg
|
|
Attachment 6: 20240522_153807.jpg
|
|
Attachment 7: 20240522_153809.jpg
|
|
Attachment 8: 20240522_153810.jpg
|
|
Attachment 9: 20240522_153819.jpg
|
|
|
30
|
Thu Mar 21 15:45:48 2019 |
NH, AS, SA, MP | Snout Mounting & DSSD Bias |
The AIDA snout (with single DSSD and plastic) has been mounted in S4 cave again. DSSD was connected to the outer 4 FEEs again.
-160 V Bias applied and DSSD holds voltage with leakage current of around 1.3 uA (was dropping as only biased briefly)
Bias off and FEEs offline again now as day nearly done. MBS testing will be performed shortly, as well as resolution checks. |
Attachment 1: LeakageBias.png
|
|
|
544
|
Thu Mar 21 15:41:49 2024 |
NH, AM, MP, CC | Thu Mar 21 |
Fig 1-3: Noise situation at real thresholds (0xa p+n, 0xf n+n)
Fig 4-6: After AM and MP turn off Mesytec Preamps
No difference |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-03-21_16-17-59.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-03-21_16-18-25.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-03-21_16-18-42.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-03-21_16-39-12.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2024-03-21_16-39-26.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2024-03-21_16-39-39.png
|
|
|
546
|
Fri Mar 22 08:22:43 2024 |
NH, AM, MP, CC | Thu Mar 21 |
> Fig 1-3: Noise situation at real thresholds (0xa p+n, 0xf n+n)
>
> Fig 4-6: After AM and MP turn off Mesytec Preamps
>
> No difference
I think there is a difference in the 1.8.W spectra - the 100kHz ripple is reduced significantly when the Mesytec preamps are switched off. |
|
47
|
Wed Apr 10 12:33:58 2019 |
NH VP | AIDA Firmware Update |
All AIDA modules have been updated to a new firmware 0xd330701 which should fix the merger issues.
A new GSI WR timestamp page has been added to MIDAS - the SYNC rollover is suggested to be 0xe for now.
(VP is working on lowering the rate of WR SYNC infowords)
Tested yesterday and Merger no longer reported major timestamp issues
n.b. aida11 and aida12 didn't update properly until today, this may have caused a few.
MBS relay is currently not functioning (data is confusing) but this is under investigation by VP ASAP.
|
Attachment 1: 20191004-FeeTemps.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 20191004-GSIWR.png
|
|
|
107
|
Mon Dec 16 14:48:02 2019 |
NH TD | AIDA 16.12.19 |
DSSD Snout was reassembled to install the second bPlast (downstream)
(fig 1)
Ribbon cable for aida10 was replaced (DSSD3 upper)
All DSSDs bias again (see fig 2)
Alpha run in progress - channels OK with 2 exceptions (fig 3)
- aida10 still recording minimal to no counts
- channel 55 aida08 reading lots of data even with comparator 0x64 - corresponds to DSSD1 strip 0 (bottom strip)
possible ground/cable issue? will check when access possible (fig 4)
Unusual MIDAS error noticed (fig 5) - restart of HTTPd fixed it |
Attachment 1: 20191213_103710.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: 161219_aida_DSSDs.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 161219_rates.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 161219_aida0855.png
|
|
Attachment 5: midasmessage131219.png
|
|
|
406
|
Wed Mar 9 10:15:56 2022 |
NH TD | Wednesday 9 March - noise tests contd. |
11.15 - S4 is currently closed no access
If access possible (should be) plan is
Re-attach ribbon cable braids
Re-attach DSSSD middle wafer rear g/r (LK3)
Re-attach DSSSD ground (LK2?)
See difference in rates, expectation is braid should restore most p+n rates
Once status quo ante achieved explore ASIC settings to identify preamp feedback and shaping time options to stabilise preamp output and optimise signal:noise.
aida12 Peak width = 84.73
aida02 Peak width = 526.68
Attachment 1 - Stats
Attachment 2 - Per FEE Rates
Attachments 3,4 - Waveforms
Attachments 5,6 - Pulser Peaks
Attachment 7 - HV Bias. Leakage current recovered and does not seem to be ramping up
16.00 - Attach LK3 jumpers to aidas 1, 3, 5, 7 (DSSD ground and middle rear g/r)
Attachment 8 - Stats
Attachment 9 - Per FEE Rates
Attachment 10, 11 - Waveforms
Attachment 12, 13 - Pulser Peaks
aida12 Peak width = 78.51
aida02 Peak width = 480.90
No major change, FEES 1-8 are all noisy and FEES 9-16 are quiet
aida01, aida05 waveforms very noticably bad (100 kHz), aida03, aida07 waveforms seem OK
16.45 - Attach LK2, LK4 jumpers to all FEEs (field plane grounding)
No significant changes
Attachment 14 - Stats
Attachment 15 - Per FEE Rates
Attachment 16, 17 - Pulser Peaks
Attachment 18, 19 - Waveforms
aida12 Peak width = 71.28
aida02 Peak width = 458.18
Remove LK3 jumpers
aida12 Peak width = 71.43
aida02 Peak width = 496.05
Attachment 20 - Stats
Attachment 21 - Per FEE Rates
Attachment 22, 23 - Pulser Peaks
Attachment 24, 25 - Waveforms
Re-add jumpers - attachments 26-28
aida12 Peak width = 87.42
aida02 Peak width = 572.24
17.45 Directly bias from the p+n FEEs using SHV->BNC->Lemo - attachments 29-33
aida12 Peak width = 87.87
aida02 Peak width = 504.41
The correlation between high 'ADC data item' rate and the noise observed on the corresponding 1.8.W spectrum is not clear *except* for aida01 & aida05 - see also attachments 34-35
ADC data item stats - attachment 36
DSSSD bias & leakage current OK - attachment 37
FEE64 temperatures OK - attachment 38
all system wide checks OK *except aida11 clock fail status 6 |
Attachment 1: 2022-03-09_15-37-08_stats.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2022-03-09_15-37-33_rates.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 2022-03-09_15-38-18_pn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 022-03-09_15-38-59_nn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 2022-03-09_15-40-23_pn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 2022-03-09_15-41-26_nn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 2022-03-09_15-42-55_hv_bias.png
|
|
Attachment 8: 2022-03-09_16-03-05_stats.png
|
|
Attachment 9: 2022-03-09_16-06-30_rates.png
|
|
Attachment 10: 2022-03-09_16-07-43_pn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 11: 2022-03-09_16-08-12_nn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 12: 2022-03-09_16-10-10_pn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 13: 2022-03-09_16-11-14_nn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 14: 2022-03-09_16-40-33_stats.png
|
|
Attachment 15: 2022-03-09_16-42-44_rates.png
|
|
Attachment 16: 2022-03-09_16-43-46_pn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 17: 2022-03-09_16-44-46_nn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 18: 2022-03-09_16-45-39_pn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 19: 2022-03-09_16-46-08_nn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 20: 2022-03-09_17-03-33_stats.png
|
|
Attachment 21: 2022-03-09_17-04-22_rates.png
|
|
Attachment 22: 2022-03-09_17-07-44_nn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 23: 2022-03-09_17-06-40_pn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 24: 2022-03-09_17-05-41_nn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 25: 2022-03-09_17-05-11_pn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 26: 2022-03-09_17-26-03_nn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 27: 2022-03-09_17-24-58_pn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 28: 2022-03-09_17-23-57_stats.png
|
|
Attachment 29: 2022-03-09_17-43-33nn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 30: 2022-03-09_17-42-29_pn_widths.png
|
|
Attachment 31: 2022-03-09_17-41-23_stats.png
|
|
Attachment 32: 2022-03-09_17-45-55_nn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 33: 2022-03-09_17-45-27_pn_waves.png
|
|
Attachment 34: Screenshot_from_2022-03-09_18-12-13.png
|
|
Attachment 35: Screenshot_from_2022-03-09_18-11-32.png
|
|
Attachment 36: Screenshot_from_2022-03-09_18-27-23.png
|
|
Attachment 37: Screenshot_from_2022-03-09_18-32-13.png
|
|
Attachment 38: Screenshot_from_2022-03-09_18-35-24.png
|
|
|
427
|
Tue May 10 07:41:28 2022 |
NH TD | Tuesday 10 May |
8:15am S4 CONTROLLED ACCESS to remove beam plug and check bPlas/AIDA response to beam
Reseat aida05 ribbon cable on adapter board while in...
No difference to rates, aida05 still shows hot asic01
aida14 seems seated OK, still asic02 basically empty
Noise level still high, threshold set to 0x20 (320 keV) which has decent rate
Start forwarding to MBS with 0x20 thresholds
10.12 slow comparator 0x20 -> 0xa
Attachments 1-5
Attachment 6 ADC data items
c. 150-180k per FEE64, c. 21Mb to disk
Attachment 7 FEE64 temps OK
Attachment 8 DSSSD bias & leakage currents OK
13.30 system checks
N.B. aida05 ASIC temp low and pause/resume data rate high
Attachment 9 grafana monitor of DSSSD bias & leakage current & temperature OK
Attachments 10-15 spectra
Attacahments 16-19 system wide checks OK *except* WR error counter
Attachment 20 ADC data items
c. 150-180k per FEE64, c. 21Mb to disk
Attachment 21 FEE64 temps OK
Attachment 22 DSSSD bias & leakage currents OK
Attachments 23-29 newMerger stats
20:37 - Begin implantation test, raise threshold to 0x64 just to ensure system is stable
22:26 - No implantation test although we had some brief beam through AIDA.
- FRS team having difficulty aligning beam still, will work overnight and try to implant tomorrow
Will keep DAQ on 0x64 to eliminate deadtime issues for implantation |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_10-11-54.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_10-10-09.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_10-08-55.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_10-08-02.png
|
|
Attachment 5: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_10-07-01.png
|
|
Attachment 6: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_10-06-30.png
|
|
Attachment 7: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_10-06-20.png
|
|
Attachment 8: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_10-06-15.png
|
|
Attachment 9: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-40-43.png
|
|
Attachment 10: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-40-01.png
|
|
Attachment 11: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-37-40.png
|
|
Attachment 12: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-37-33.png
|
|
Attachment 13: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-36-39.png
|
|
Attachment 14: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-35-06.png
|
|
Attachment 15: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-34-44.png
|
|
Attachment 16: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-31-05.png
|
|
Attachment 17: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-30-59.png
|
|
Attachment 18: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-30-52.png
|
|
Attachment 19: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-29-58.png
|
|
Attachment 20: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-29-42.png
|
|
Attachment 21: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-29-20.png
|
|
Attachment 22: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-28-48.png
|
|
Attachment 23: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-51-23.png
|
|
Attachment 24: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-51-05.png
|
|
Attachment 25: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-49-53.png
|
|
Attachment 26: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-49-41.png
|
|
Attachment 27: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-49-32.png
|
|
Attachment 28: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-49-12.png
|
|
Attachment 29: Screenshot_from_2022-05-10_13-48-56.png
|
|
|
87
|
Tue Nov 5 10:02:45 2019 |
NH PJCS | Report: aida10 database corruption |
This looks like the Options not the ASIC data. That will be in the CONTENTS file of the FEE64 named directory within the dated EXPERIMENT directory. Looks like the latest is at /MIDAS/DB/EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2019Oct31-13.24.23/aida10 ?
A quick look at this file and it looks normal , not all 0xad ?
Looked at the Options file in the /MIDAS/DB/EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/Options.BACKUPCorrupt/aida10 and the worst bit is the name of the Data Acquistion program. That could well cause you problems with readout as it won't understand some of the new data.
Hope this helps.
Quote: |
Often aida10 database seems to get corrupted (ASIC values are all 0xad)
Unsure why it's only aida10, might be related to weird alpha rate behaviour at the moment.
Attached is corrupted database and correct database
|
|
|
88
|
Tue Nov 5 10:32:21 2019 |
NH PJCS | Report: aida10 database corruption |
Hi, see the attached files in the original comment. I think the BACKUPCorrupt is quite old now.
The Options data gets corrupted and for example the ASIC folder gets set to 'undefined' which I think is why the ASIC data loads incorrectly.
Quote: |
This looks like the Options not the ASIC data. That will be in the CONTENTS file of the FEE64 named directory within the dated EXPERIMENT directory. Looks like the latest is at /MIDAS/DB/EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/2019Oct31-13.24.23/aida10 ?
A quick look at this file and it looks normal , not all 0xad ?
Looked at the Options file in the /MIDAS/DB/EXPERIMENTS/AIDA/Options.BACKUPCorrupt/aida10 and the worst bit is the name of the Data Acquistion program. That could welll cause you problems with readout as it won't understand some of the new data.
Quote: |
Often aida10 database seems to get corrupted (ASIC values are all 0xad)
Unsure why it's only aida10, might be related to weird alpha rate behaviour at the moment.
Attached is corrupted database and correct database
|
|
|