 Sun Mar 17 12:11:37 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, myGOE.f Nuclei 21x
|
| |
|
Fri Mar 15 10:14:12 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, New MACS
|
| |
|
Mon Mar 11 16:29:08 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Mixed Nuclei 8x
|
| |
|
Mon Feb 19 21:42:39 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, MACS
|
| Excel Sheet of results, orange ones are nuclei that required both TALYS and mygoe.f. This file is colour coded - can be seen below the table. |
|
Sat Feb 17 21:30:23 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, K43+n Variations By Combination of Models
|
| K43-13 and -42. |
|
Sat Feb 17 20:42:03 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Ar37+n Variations By Combination of Models
|
| Ar37-13 and -42. |
|
Sat Feb 17 20:35:21 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Cl36+n Variations By Combination of Models
|
| Cl36-10 and -42. |
|
Sat Feb 17 20:18:15 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Ca45+n Variations By Combination of Models
|
| Ca45-20 and -42. |
|
Thu Feb 1 10:10:04 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, List of Nuclei with MACS
|
This is the Excel sheet with the list of nuclei and their corresponding MACS. Yellow fill shows the nuclei with experimental cross sections, green fill
shows the nuclei that obey the statistical calculations and blue fill shows the nuclei with the Gaussian distributions. |
|
Tue Jan 30 10:37:56 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, K43+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
| The variations of MACS distribution of K43+nwith different level density models. K43+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.025 MeV. |
|
Thu Jan 18 17:36:32 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Ca45+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of Ca45+n with different level density models. Ca45+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below approx.
0.020 MeV. |
|
Thu Jan 18 15:43:13 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, K41+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
| The variations of MACS distribution of K41+nwith different level density models. K41+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.022 MeV. |
|
Thu Jan 18 11:08:23 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, K39+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
| The variations of MACS distribution of K39+nwith different level density models. K39+ncannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.028 MeV. |
|
Thu Jan 18 10:52:48 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Ar37+n Variations by Different Models 6x
|
| The variations of MACS distribution of Ar37+n with different level density models. Ar37+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below 0.022 MeV. |
|
Wed Jan 17 16:15:49 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Cl36+n Variations by Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of Cl36+n with different level density models. Cl36+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model below approx.
0.020 MeV. |
|
Wed Jan 17 15:58:40 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Cl35+n Variations by Different Models 6x
|
| The variations of MACS distribution of Cl35+n with different level density models. Cl35+n cannot be predicted by the statistical model belowe 0.026 MeV. |
|
Wed Jan 17 09:23:28 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, P31+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
| The variations of MACS distribution of P31+n with different nuclear models generated by TALYS. |
|
Wed Jan 17 09:17:57 2024, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Ca42+n Variations By Different Models 6x
|
The variations of MACS distribution of Ca42+n with different nuclear models generated by TALYS. When the level density is high enough, the resonances
seem to decrease as TALYS obeys the statistical model. |
|
Thu Nov 30 13:54:25 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Files for Na23+n 6x
|
1 -> macs.root: MACS distribution file
2 -> read.C: file to graph the histogram
3 -> list.dat: reads every run done by mygoe.f |
|
Wed Nov 8 15:20:17 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, TALYS Parameters from Different Models
|
This is the parameters of Ca42+n and Ca50+n acquired from differen models. They were chosen as they have Gaussian distributions which are consistent
with TALYS calculations of MACS. Ca42+n has experimental values while Ca50+n does not. |
|
Mon Nov 6 09:20:53 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, TALYS including MACS
|
| |
|
Sat Nov 4 14:05:19 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Ne22+n
|
1. This graph is Ne22+n with a log scale. Theorotical cross section is around 0.05 while the experimental is 0.061, which matches relatively well.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with log scale.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with log scale. |
|
Sat Nov 4 14:01:18 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Ca43+n
|
1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Ca43+n with rebinned to 10 total. Theorotical cross section is around 110 while the experimental is 66.1.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10. |
|
Sat Nov 4 13:56:02 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Ca42+n
|
1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Ca42+n with rebinned to 10 total. Theorotical cross section is around 15 while the experimental is 16.5, which matches
well.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10. |
|
Sat Nov 4 13:45:53 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of P31+n
|
1. This graph is fitted P31+n with rebinned to 10. Theorotical cross section is around 2 and the experimental value is 1.74, which relatively match.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1 with bins = 10. |
|
Sat Nov 4 13:40:39 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Si28+n
|
1. This graph is the exponential decay Si28+n total. Theorotical cross section is between 0-1.5 while the experimental should be towards 1.15
2. This the the distribution of l = 0.
3. This the the distribution of l = 1. |
|
Sat Nov 4 13:18:53 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Gaussian fit of Cl35+n with a binning of 10
|
1. This graph is the Gaussian fitted Cl35+n with rebinned total. Experimental cross section is around 12 while the graph shows the maximum probability
as around 7.
2. This the the distribution of l = 0 with bins = 10. |
|
Wed Nov 1 16:14:37 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Cl35+n
|
Cross Section Distributions for Cl35+n; where macs01 is for l=0, macs11 is for l=1and macs1 is for the total.
The most probable value is less than what is expected (around 13 in the EXCEL sheet). |
|
Thu Oct 26 18:09:12 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Na23+n
|
Cross Section Distributions for Na23+n;where macs01 is for l=0, macs11 is for l=1and macs1 is for the total. This is an example
of logarithmic decline due to high level spacing (stable nuclei). |
|
Thu Oct 26 17:59:17 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Maxwellian Cross Section Distribution of Cl37+n
|
| Cross Section Distributions for Cl37+n; where macs01 is for l=0, macs11 is for l=1 and macs1 is for the total. This is an example of Gaussian-like behaviour. |
|
Wed Oct 18 15:54:26 2023, Selin Ezgi Birincioglu, Parameters from TALYS
|
These are the parameters taken from TALYS to further utilize them as inputs for MyGOE.f - generating nuclear levels. In the sheet the masses are target
+ n while the input mass is the target nuclei. |